supercharged 2.2 vs supercharged 2.0... what are your takes?
06-26-2004, 03:36 AM
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St. Augustine
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
supercharged 2.2 vs supercharged 2.0... what are your takes?
I dont mean to start a war or anything but I want to know what you guy think on how they compair.
Trending Topics
06-26-2004, 09:36 PM
#9
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Home of LSU TIGERS
Posts: 2,254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well I know the pulley size is what determines it, but max boost regardless of size comes on at redline. So considering the same sized pulley for both engines, I would assume a lower max psi for the 2.2 engine. But with it's overall more power throughout the powerband, I'm sure it will still outperform with less PSI, as much as I'd hate to say that also.. 
06-26-2004, 10:03 PM
#10
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: orlando
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
why just not forget about supercharger and get a turbo . Like the one from ultimate-racing.com . It seems good enough for both street and track performance and if u reall wanna get carzy cahnge to lower compression pistons and get a turbo with a boost of about 20 psi. but if u dont wanna get that crazy stay with the ultimate racing turbo n u wont have to do no internal work. And its a little more bang for the same buck of the comptech and vortech SC.
It should be better on the 2.2 but if u want some more high end power id say the 2.o with the 9,000 rpm.
It should be better on the 2.2 but if u want some more high end power id say the 2.o with the 9,000 rpm.