S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Traction control needed?

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 22, 2012 | 08:32 AM
  #11  
frei's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,840
Likes: 1
From: Fort Polk, LA
Default

Originally Posted by caraficionado
My primary concerns are:

1. Cornering at high speeds and losing the tail (I go up to the mountains a lot - would like to not fall off the edge!)
2. Hydroplaning in wet conditions
3. Emergency avoidance (avoiding debris on a highway at 70 mph)
1. Slow down
2. Slow down... In wet conditions
3. Slow down... and go around the debris
4. Go to a HPDE EVENT OR AN AUTOCROSS EVENT and learn the limits of your car and yourself...
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2012 | 09:38 AM
  #12  
s.hasan546's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,170
Likes: 118
From: Long Island, NY
Default

Originally Posted by rob-2
I'm shocked this keeps coming up. About 30 years ago there was no traction control. If you crashed the car, you got seriously hurt AND many of the cars were rwd. It's amazing as the human race we ever made it through that very dark time!
Are you really serious? Road fatalities are down over 20% in the past 40 years. Cars are much safer today. There's nothing wrong with progress.

Maybe you should rip out the ABS, airbags, and seat belts in your car too.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2012 | 11:33 AM
  #13  
Not Sure's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,553
Likes: 0
Default

With a massive 150 lbs of torque at the flywheel you won't need tc unless you've got a lead foot.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2012 | 01:40 PM
  #14  
TougeHorseman's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
15 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,567
Likes: 9
From: Professor Touge Emeritus
Default

Originally Posted by s.hasan546
Originally Posted by rob-2' timestamp='1350919525' post='22100107
I'm shocked this keeps coming up. About 30 years ago there was no traction control. If you crashed the car, you got seriously hurt AND many of the cars were rwd. It's amazing as the human race we ever made it through that very dark time!
Are you really serious? Road fatalities are down over 20% in the past 40 years. Cars are much safer today. There's nothing wrong with progress.

Maybe you should rip out the ABS, airbags, and seat belts in your car too.
Rob Rob Rob.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2012 | 02:56 PM
  #15  
rob-2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,655
Likes: 171
Default

Originally Posted by s.hasan546
Originally Posted by rob-2' timestamp='1350919525' post='22100107
I'm shocked this keeps coming up. About 30 years ago there was no traction control. If you crashed the car, you got seriously hurt AND many of the cars were rwd. It's amazing as the human race we ever made it through that very dark time!
Are you really serious? Road fatalities are down over 20% in the past 40 years. Cars are much safer today. There's nothing wrong with progress.

Maybe you should rip out the ABS, airbags, and seat belts in your car too.
The reduction in deaths has been due to improvements with things like airbags, seat belts, crumple zone and the removal of deadly items inside the cabin, with things like collapsible steering columns and 'softer' interior dashes. This is generally referred to as the survivability of a vehicle upon impact.

Traction control, not to be confused with vehicle stability is a 'user assist' not a 'life safer' please don't make this a honda tech, ignorant discussion. Go do your research.

Also re-read what I said. I never said deaths aren't on the decline.

ABS there is an interesting debate on this one. When ABS first caused pedal vibration, many ignorant drivers got off the pedals. The short term effect was near zero change in crash ratings. I do believe ABS is a safety feature, that isn't required if you know how to drive. Threshold braking, which was how I was taught to brake allows a reasonable driver to reach the limit of grip. However even with ABS, stopping physical distance increases. Same car without abs will stop in a shorter physical distance. Time and vehicle control are big factors. ABS does take a bad driver and make them marginally better. But the big improvements are not actually in ABS itself, but what, when combined with another system allows the car to control the brakes in a 'vehicle stability system' ABS on it's own does little, but a stability system working together with what ABS allows for saved lives.

This nicely and shortly summarizes my research on ABS -http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2006/08/killer-abs-abs-braking-increases-rollover-risk-by-51/ (I did not write this).

In 1996, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety published a news release titled “Antilock Brakes Don’t Reduce Fatal Crashes; People in Cars With Antilocks at Greater Risks- But Unclear Why.” In 1998, Leonard Evans of General Motors’ Global R&D Operations checked NHTSA’s ABS crash data and concluded “it is unlikely that on dry roads ABS can materially reduce risk” and, more shockingly, “ABS is associated with a 44% increase in rollover risk.” In 1999, the Society of Automotive Engineers reported that “ABS was found to be associated with a 51 percent increase in fatal rollover crashes on dry roads. For fatal side impact crashes, ABS produced a 69 percent increase for unfavorable road conditions, and a 61 percent increase for favorable road conditions.”
Please again, go do some research before you come here all half cocked on silliness. Traction control has no sizable safety rating or any research to suggest it saves lives.

Edit/ don't just take my word on ABS read it from IIHS - http://www.iihs.org/research/advisor...dvisory_17.pdf
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2012 | 03:08 PM
  #16  
rob-2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,655
Likes: 171
Default

Originally Posted by eklipz98
Originally Posted by s.hasan546' timestamp='1350927494' post='22100485
[quote name='rob-2' timestamp='1350919525' post='22100107']
I'm shocked this keeps coming up. About 30 years ago there was no traction control. If you crashed the car, you got seriously hurt AND many of the cars were rwd. It's amazing as the human race we ever made it through that very dark time!
Are you really serious? Road fatalities are down over 20% in the past 40 years. Cars are much safer today. There's nothing wrong with progress.

Maybe you should rip out the ABS, airbags, and seat belts in your car too.
Rob Rob Rob.
[/quote]
Bring some intelligence to discussions.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2012 | 08:21 AM
  #17  
AZS2KDancer's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,326
Likes: 30
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

The post that mentioned ABS braking distance is increased over non-ABS on dry pavement is essentially correct. Drivers needed to learn how to use ABS by stomping on the brake pedal, instead of the older method we might have learned, to pump the brakes. ABS pumps the brakes at a much faster rate than any human can.

What this allows the driver to do is to be able to steer the vehicle to avoid the accident ahead. ABS gives you steering control, which you lost with brakes locking up on non-ABS systems.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2012 | 11:44 AM
  #18  
LeonV's Avatar
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 690
Likes: 12
From: SF Bay Area
Default

My 260Z doesn't have TCS, VSA, ABS, TPMS, GPS or air bags for that matter. There are some pedals and a steering wheel. Makes you pay attention.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2012 | 12:02 PM
  #19  
RedCelica's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 15,342
Likes: 103
From: Raleigh
Default

It's federally mandated.../thread
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2012 | 12:19 PM
  #20  
Sabre's Avatar
Community Organizer
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,961
Likes: 12
From: Oregon City, OR
Default

130k miles of driving this S with only one spin-out about 3 months into ownership due to worn out tires.
Other than that, no drama.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:09 AM.