S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Updated dyno numbers

Thread Tools
 
Old May 6, 2006 | 03:59 PM
  #1  
2QYK4U's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,790
Likes: 0
Talking Updated dyno numbers

I had my S dyno'd today to find out what additional power it made, if any, with the new AEM CAI. Here are my power mods to date:

Toda exhaust manifold
J's Racing straight pipe
Invidia dual cat-back exhaust
AEM CAI
Hondata IMG
Hondata ECU reflash

Here is my dyno chart:

[See resized pic below. ]

Although my S was dyno'd on a dynapack, the results are fairly impressive. Next Saturday I am having Spugen make me a custom, header back, 3" single exhaust. I'll have my S dyno'd again after that exhaust is installed.
Old May 6, 2006 | 04:11 PM
  #2  
steve c's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 6,792
Likes: 4
Default

Old May 6, 2006 | 04:38 PM
  #3  
darkfx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,095
Likes: 0
From: its back!
Default

Very nice!!!!

Did the reflash make the biggest difference?
Old May 6, 2006 | 04:41 PM
  #4  
44Runner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 0
From: Mt. Pleasant, SC
Default

awesome, decent numbers for sure...
Old May 6, 2006 | 04:42 PM
  #5  
2QYK4U's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,790
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by darkfx,May 6 2006, 05:38 PM
Very nice!!!!

Did the reflash make the biggest difference?
The reflash definately "cleaned up" the AFR.

I am hoping for another 3-4rwhp with the single exhaust.
Old May 6, 2006 | 05:50 PM
  #6  
steve c's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 6,792
Likes: 4
Default

Those are flywheel numbers though.

Which begs the question, this is the same guy (church) who claims 04+'s put down 220 to the wheels --- yet here we have a modded 06 putting down 240ish (corrected even) at the crank...
Old May 6, 2006 | 06:05 PM
  #7  
124Spider's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,571
Likes: 0
From: Redmond, Washington, USA
Default

^ I find myself agreeing with Sunshine (in substance, if not in style); I have no idea how dynoing at the wheels is translated into crank HP/torque by that machine, but 246hp at the crank is not materially different from spec for a stock car, so where's the beef? Hell, my absolutely stock MY04 dyno'd 210 at the wheels, corrected, on a dynojet, which is about 15% less than this car at the crank; 15% is often quoted as a standard drivetrain loss for a rwd car.

Trending Topics

Old May 6, 2006 | 06:08 PM
  #8  
2QYK4U's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,790
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by steve c,May 6 2006, 06:50 PM
Those are flywheel numbers though.

Which begs the question, this is the same guy (church) who claims 04+'s put down 220 to the wheels --- yet here we have a modded 06 putting down 240ish (corrected even) at the crank...
They are not flywheel numbers. Stop getting hung up on the wording on the dyno graph. The numbers are at the wheels. This has been debated at great length. No need to continue debating it. Church's dyno uses a dynapack, and they use a TCF of 1.0 which takes into account drivetrain loss, vehicle weight and wheel size.
Old May 6, 2006 | 06:09 PM
  #9  
SilverKnight's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 10,418
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
Default

this is the dyno who says people are dynoing 240-250 rwhp with a few bolt ons........
Old May 6, 2006 | 06:11 PM
  #10  
SilverKnight's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 10,418
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
Default

[QUOTE=2QYK4U,May 6 2006, 07:09 PM] There will always be haters.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:43 AM.