2QYK4U

I had my S dyno'd today to find out what additional power it made, if any, with the new AEM CAI. Here are my power mods to date:

Toda exhaust manifold
J's Racing straight pipe
Invidia dual cat-back exhaust
AEM CAI
Hondata IMG
Hondata ECU reflash

Here is my dyno chart:

[See resized pic below. ]

Although my S was dyno'd on a dynapack, the results are fairly impressive. Next Saturday I am having Spugen make me a custom, header back, 3" single exhaust. I'll have my S dyno'd again after that exhaust is installed.

steve c

darkfx

Very nice!!!!

Did the reflash make the biggest difference?

44Runner

awesome, decent numbers for sure...

2QYK4U

The reflash definately "cleaned up" the AFR.

I am hoping for another 3-4rwhp with the single exhaust.

steve c

Those are flywheel numbers though.

Which begs the question, this is the same guy (church) who claims 04+'s put down 220 to the wheels --- yet here we have a modded 06 putting down 240ish (corrected even) at the crank...

124Spider

^ I find myself agreeing with Sunshine (in substance, if not in style); I have no idea how dynoing at the wheels is translated into crank HP/torque by that machine, but 246hp at the crank is not materially different from spec for a stock car, so where's the beef? Hell, my absolutely stock MY04 dyno'd 210 at the wheels, corrected, on a dynojet, which is about 15% less than this car at the crank; 15% is often quoted as a standard drivetrain loss for a rwd car.

2QYK4U

They are not flywheel numbers. Stop getting hung up on the wording on the dyno graph. The numbers are at the wheels. This has been debated at great length. No need to continue debating it. Church's dyno uses a dynapack, and they use a TCF of 1.0 which takes into account drivetrain loss, vehicle weight and wheel size.

SilverKnight

this is the dyno who says people are dynoing 240-250 rwhp with a few bolt ons........

SilverKnight

[QUOTE=2QYK4U,May 6 2006, 07:09 PM] There will always be haters.