S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Why do some people hydroplane and others don't?

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 10, 2001 | 04:15 PM
  #51  
turbolane's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,610
Likes: 1
From: Clearlake, CA
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by TXRacer
[B]After setting all tires to 32psi, the back seems to step more progressively than it did before (on dry pavement).
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2001 | 04:20 PM
  #52  
Bieg's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 894
Likes: 0
From: :spam:u
Default

Regarding TxRacer with his tire pressure on one tire so far off....

It proves my point about taking what people say about the "handling" of this car with a grain of salt unless they have verified their tire pressures with a calibrated gauge. I am sure there are others on this board that do not have a clue what their tire pressures are but they will tell you all about how evil the S2000 handles with the factory S02s.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2001 | 08:21 PM
  #53  
dlq04's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 45,849
Likes: 8,352
From: Mish-she-gan
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by jschmidt
[B]BTW, I think you've done your math backwards Power to weight is usually expressed in HP per pound (per your indication.) in our case 11.7 to 1 which is wonderful but not nearly unheard of.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2001 | 08:46 PM
  #54  
jschmidt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
From: Laurel
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Bieg
[B]Regarding TxRacer with his tire pressure on one tire so far off....

It proves my point about taking what people say about the "handling" of this car with a grain of salt unless they have verified their tire pressures with a calibrated gauge.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2001 | 05:31 AM
  #55  
dlq04's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 45,849
Likes: 8,352
From: Mish-she-gan
Default

Mr. Science, you forgot to add that it's not unusal for a car to show all three - understeer, oversteer, and netural. Especially well balanced sportscars that scream 'come and drive me'.

What most folks are looking for is a car that gives the driver strong early messages, especially in street driving. This is preferred on the track as well since driving a car on the edge requires much concentration and is extremely tiring.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2001 | 06:40 AM
  #56  
jschmidt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
From: Laurel
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by dlq04
[B]Mr. Science, you forgot to add that it's not unusal for a car to show all three - understeer, oversteer, and netural.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2001 | 07:35 AM
  #57  
Doug Hayashi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
From: H.B.- Center of Universe
Default

Hydroplaning: You shouldn't be driving 65-75 mph in the rain. I took a driver's school in Germany, and one of the exercises was to drive 75 mph into a long straightaway about 10 feet wide, 300 feet long, that was lower by 1/2 inch, and filled with 1/2 in of water. The instructor took us in a four seater sedan at 75 mph, and asked if if he was hydroplaning. We all said no. He then promptly turned the wheel left-right-left-right and the car went absolutely straight through the water. The car had fully treaded tires on it. He then told us to be extra extra safe when conditions are wet, as you never know when you are going to hit a big puddle.

If you are driving an S2000, and you happen to hit a 1/2 inch puddle going 75 and you have to make a steering input, it might be too little (or too much), and then you try to recompensate and "catch it", and then you over compensate, and then you are in a big spin.

Just my humble opinion, I could be wrong,
-Doug
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2001 | 08:46 AM
  #58  
PLYRS 3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 23,749
Likes: 3
From: Erock's my boat!
Default

this may be a little late in the discussion, but...

personally, i disagree about the uneven tire wear because it is not happening to me...

i have 3 different sets of wheels/tires that go on the car depending on season/time of year/my mood - and i can say that ALL of the tires (yes, all 12) are wearing evenly. i have a 2000MY with 50,000 KM.

having said that, my car could be the exception to the rule as even my local tire guys are always amazed how evenly the tires are wearing (even my snow tires).

i fellow board member just picked up my "bald" OEM rears (for his track use) and commented about how evenly they were worn.

and no, i've never had a spin-out/loss-of-control situation.

do you think the "off-spec" alignment issue is the "exception" or the "rule"?

regards.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2001 | 08:47 AM
  #59  
PLYRS 3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 23,749
Likes: 3
From: Erock's my boat!
Default

this may be a little late in the discussion, but...

personally, i disagree about the uneven tire wear because it is not happening to me...

i have 3 different sets of wheels/tires that go on the car depending on season/time of year/my mood - and i can say that ALL of the tires (yes, all 12) are wearing evenly. i have a 2000MY with 50,000 KM.

having said that, my car could be the exception to the rule as even my local tire guys are always amazed how evenly the tires are wearing (even my snow tires).

i fellow board member just picked up my "bald" OEM rears (for his track use) and commented about how evenly they were worn.

and no, i've never had a spin-out/loss-of-control situation.

do you think the "off-spec" alignment issue is the "exception" rather than the "rule"?

regards.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2001 | 09:05 AM
  #60  
s2ktaxi's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 4,436
Likes: 0
From: WA
Default

deja vu...
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:21 AM.