S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

Body roll...eliminating/reducing

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 20, 2003 | 12:17 PM
  #31  
Gernby's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 19
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by munckee
I've been toying with the idea of swaybars as well.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2003 | 01:04 PM
  #32  
drewchie's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,539
Likes: 0
From: Santa Monica
Default

Go with the Saner! I think there's a group buy on them now from the Go Fast Lab (Check with Rylan)

The Saner is adjustable and can be altered to fit the type of driving you plan to do. It will not only reduce oversteer, but also allow you to run 225 tires on the front instead of the 205s. The Muz isn't adjustable, and it only provides a slight advantage over stock, so I wouldn't bother. The Saner is more expensive, but well worth the dif.

The stock rear bar is adequete for most applications and probably doesn't need to be replaced. If you wanted to, Saner makes an excellent rear bar too.

IMHO
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2003 | 01:09 PM
  #33  
Gernby's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 19
Default

Is the REAR Saner bar adjustable?
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2003 | 02:14 PM
  #34  
amongmany's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,203
Likes: 0
From: LA
Default

Thanks guys! So you're running 225's up front on stock wheels? Do you keep the rear the same size (I'm assuming this is 245 since you're clearly not using OEM front tires).
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2003 | 02:22 PM
  #35  
Gernby's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 19
Default

I just switched from 205/55-16 up front to 225/50-16s, and I hate them. I have always liked 225/50-16 Kumho Victoracers up front, but they have very stiff side walls. The street tires that I have now (Yoko AVS-I) have such soft side walls that the wider tires roll over way too much. I actually have LESS traction up front with the wider tires.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2003 | 04:00 PM
  #36  
cdelena's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,210
Likes: 7
From: WA
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by gernby
I just switched from 205/55-16 up front to 225/50-16s, and I hate them.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2003 | 04:09 PM
  #37  
Gernby's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 19
Default

Maybe you could go with 225/50's all the way around, and it would even out.

BTW, I didn't actually PAY for these (used) AVS-I's.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2003 | 04:57 PM
  #38  
drewchie's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,539
Likes: 0
From: Santa Monica
Default

Putting the same size all around would be a mistake. That's not how our car was designed. Going with 225s without upgrading the sway bar is another mistake.

As for 245s in back, the stock S02 although it says 225 is actually closer to a 245. 245 is the correct replacement size if you're not going with the OEM S02.

As for tires, the shaved RA1s rock for us out in dry California. They stick like glue and wear like iron.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2003 | 05:47 PM
  #39  
Gernby's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 19
Default

My point was the 225/50's in the front REDUCE grip due to rollover (for street tires), and 225/50's in the rear REDUCE grip due to reduced width. The two combined might cancel each other out, and have a stock balance on OEM wheels.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2003 | 07:15 PM
  #40  
Kekoa's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 9,866
Likes: 0
From: Place to be
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by gernby
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:08 AM.