S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

Compression numbers for F22C

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-31-2016, 06:30 AM
  #1  

Thread Starter
 
Fabulous_omelet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 80
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Compression numbers for F22C

So, I've picked up an AP2 shell, complete minus engine + trans, and I'm now sourcing it's new heart transplant. I'm looking at buying an F22C with 51k on it this Sunday, and I've had 2 compression tests done on it. First test was done cold by accident, second was fully warmed up. First was 180 all across, warmed up was 220 all across.
Should I be worried about 220 compression on an engine with only 51k on it? Obviously, these aren't cheap. Plus, I'm extra paranoid as I've already replaced the engine in my current AP1 once due to bad compression.
Old 10-31-2016, 07:05 AM
  #2  

 
Slowcrash_101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,224
Received 403 Likes on 338 Posts
Default

Nominal compression from the factory is 228 psi +-10%
Old 10-31-2016, 08:34 AM
  #3  

Thread Starter
 
Fabulous_omelet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 80
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah, I've seen the factory numbers, which is generally regarded as lower than new, with 240 being new. I've seen F22's shoot as high as 270's to 280's though, so maybe I'm just being over paranoid with this.
Old 10-31-2016, 09:38 AM
  #4  
Community Organizer

 
s2000Junky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,053
Received 551 Likes on 503 Posts
Default

With them being even numbers across the board (which is the most important factor in determining an issue) Id guess the gauge reads on the low side. Id go for it if the price is right. 51k is a solid mileage to invest ones trouble in.
Old 10-31-2016, 03:57 PM
  #5  

 
Soviet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Fremont, CA
Posts: 1,867
Received 109 Likes on 70 Posts
Default

no
Old 11-20-2016, 08:18 AM
  #6  
Registered User

 
johngamez10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 81
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

it was probably driven harder or your gauge reads low. my compression numbers (i'm at 58K) are pretty close to 240 all across using a snap-on tester.
Old 11-20-2016, 09:40 AM
  #7  

 
HarryD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,115
Received 49 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Consistency across cylinders is key.

Many on here have a hard-on with blowing 240 across the board, when things like gauge calibration, sea level, temperature, human error, etc. all play a part.

Just another pissing contest on this board IMO.
Old 11-20-2016, 12:55 PM
  #8  

 
Chuck S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Chesterfield VA
Posts: 12,523
Received 1,131 Likes on 994 Posts
Default

Numbers look good to me. What ECU? What year engine?

Unless we're comparing certified, calibrated compression gauges consistency across all four cylinders is the key.

-- Chuck
Old 11-20-2016, 01:19 PM
  #9  
Registered User

 
johngamez10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 81
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

LOL. Yes, consistency is key. Nevertheless, getting 240 across gives me peace of mind.
Old 11-20-2016, 01:30 PM
  #10  

 
Spartarus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 117
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

To answer your question, no.

To answer your problem... If you're buying without a warranty or guarantee in writing, don't buy anything you're not prepared to rebuild.

Building a shell car is fun, but there are good reasons that the sucess/completion rate is low.

It either requires a very particular philosophy of approach, or a lot of luck.


Quick Reply: Compression numbers for F22C



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:15 PM.