S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

Compression numbers for F22C

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 31, 2016 | 06:30 AM
  #1  
Fabulous_omelet's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Default Compression numbers for F22C

So, I've picked up an AP2 shell, complete minus engine + trans, and I'm now sourcing it's new heart transplant. I'm looking at buying an F22C with 51k on it this Sunday, and I've had 2 compression tests done on it. First test was done cold by accident, second was fully warmed up. First was 180 all across, warmed up was 220 all across.
Should I be worried about 220 compression on an engine with only 51k on it? Obviously, these aren't cheap. Plus, I'm extra paranoid as I've already replaced the engine in my current AP1 once due to bad compression.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2016 | 07:05 AM
  #2  
Slowcrash_101's Avatar
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,731
Likes: 632
Default

Nominal compression from the factory is 228 psi +-10%
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2016 | 08:34 AM
  #3  
Fabulous_omelet's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Default

Yeah, I've seen the factory numbers, which is generally regarded as lower than new, with 240 being new. I've seen F22's shoot as high as 270's to 280's though, so maybe I'm just being over paranoid with this.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2016 | 09:38 AM
  #4  
s2000Junky's Avatar
Community Organizer
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,070
Likes: 566
Default

With them being even numbers across the board (which is the most important factor in determining an issue) Id guess the gauge reads on the low side. Id go for it if the price is right. 51k is a solid mileage to invest ones trouble in.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2016 | 03:57 PM
  #5  
Soviet's Avatar
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,893
Likes: 160
From: Fremont, CA
Default

no
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2016 | 08:18 AM
  #6  
johngamez10's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 81
Likes: 1
Default

it was probably driven harder or your gauge reads low. my compression numbers (i'm at 58K) are pretty close to 240 all across using a snap-on tester.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2016 | 09:40 AM
  #7  
HarryD's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 51
From: San Francisco
Default

Consistency across cylinders is key.

Many on here have a hard-on with blowing 240 across the board, when things like gauge calibration, sea level, temperature, human error, etc. all play a part.

Just another pissing contest on this board IMO.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2016 | 12:55 PM
  #8  
Chuck S's Avatar
Member (Premium)
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 13,829
Likes: 1,550
From: Chesterfield VA
Default

Numbers look good to me. What ECU? What year engine?

Unless we're comparing certified, calibrated compression gauges consistency across all four cylinders is the key.

-- Chuck
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2016 | 01:19 PM
  #9  
johngamez10's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 81
Likes: 1
Default

LOL. Yes, consistency is key. Nevertheless, getting 240 across gives me peace of mind.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2016 | 01:30 PM
  #10  
Spartarus's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 117
Likes: 11
From: Philadelphia, PA
Default

To answer your question, no.

To answer your problem... If you're buying without a warranty or guarantee in writing, don't buy anything you're not prepared to rebuild.

Building a shell car is fun, but there are good reasons that the sucess/completion rate is low.

It either requires a very particular philosophy of approach, or a lot of luck.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:40 AM.