S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

losing to stock s2000?

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 12, 2003 | 11:26 AM
  #1  
Hatty Matty's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
From: va beach
Default losing to stock s2000?

ive got a 2002 with 23,000 miles. the mods that i have done are INJEN short ram intake, tanabe hyper exhuast, H&R springs, and 18" rims. me and a buddy of mine were messing around on the highway the other day and his his 00' with 30k miles was walking me pretty hard. now i know that the injen short ram is known to take away power but i have run consistant 14.2 quarter mile times with it. in the last 2 months i have gotten the rims lowered and exhuast but have not run in the quarter. my freind runs 14.6 in his stock. why all of a sudden am i getting walked on by him? is the rims and exhuast hurting me that bad? has something happend to my motor? anyone know anything that may be able to answer some questions?
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2003 | 11:45 AM
  #2  
mxt_77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,482
Likes: 3
From: Wylie, TX
Default

Any weight differences between the two cars? (e.g., stereo equipment, fat-ass driver )

The wheels probably have the largest impact of the things you listed, since they are probably considerably heavier than stock and have a higher moment of inertia (therefore harder to accelerate). Also, make sure you have the same outside diameter of your tires compared w/ stock. Larger diameters usually make it harder to accelerate, too.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2003 | 11:48 AM
  #3  
Gernby's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 19
Default

Quarter mile times are more about the quality of the launch than they are about peak power. It is not unheard of for 2 stock S2000s to have differences in power of 15+ rwhp. That combined with your big wheels and short ram, it doesn't seem that surprising. Did you have more weight in the car? Every 13 lbs of additional weight is about like a 1 rwhp difference.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2003 | 11:58 AM
  #4  
Hatty Matty's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
From: va beach
Default

i guess between about 50 pounds of addition wieght, 18" rims, and the short ram he SHOULD be beating me. he was just walking me a lot faster then i thought he would.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2003 | 12:12 PM
  #5  
Gernby's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 19
Default

What size tires do you have?
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2003 | 12:28 PM
  #6  
Hatty Matty's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
From: va beach
Default

shit, cant remember, there very low profile though.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2003 | 12:56 PM
  #7  
mxt_77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,482
Likes: 3
From: Wylie, TX
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by gernby
[B]Quarter mile times are more about the quality of the launch than they are about peak power.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2003 | 01:16 PM
  #8  
Hatty Matty's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
From: va beach
Default

top/windows down, ac off. he had same setup
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2003 | 02:15 PM
  #9  
Porsche518's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
From: Boca Raton,Old Folks Ville
Default

I've noticed that our comp seems to go from rich to lean cycles, try racing him again under different weather.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2003 | 02:50 PM
  #10  
Gernby's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 19
Default

Originally posted by mxt_77


BTW.. notice that he was referring to highway speeds, not 1/4 racing... so the launch probably wasn't the factor.
He was using 1/4 mile times as part of the puzzle. He couldn't understand why his 1/4 times were significantly better than his buddy's, yet his buddy still pulled on him on the highway.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:21 PM.