S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

Not Another S2000 Gear post!?

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-19-2007, 04:09 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
AP2S2.2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Not Another S2000 Gear post!?

Okay guys, so I been searching forums non-stop to figure this out and all i find is dozens of posts about what the cruising speed is with the 4.77s/4.44s... orr if someone likes it or not.

Well I could give 2 shits about either of those things. What I care about is, do you lose the acceleration at top speed. Lets say im at 100mph with the 4.10s and i punch it, vs, if i have 4.77s at 100 and I punch it... Do i loose the accel? Or is it just you go faster until you hit the gear limited top speed. This is the only question holding me back from getting any gears. Top speed is nice to have but dropping it 10-20 mph to gain a lot more acceleration is much nicer IMO.

So say, 2 AP2s are on the highway and you do a 80-130 roll, one has 4.10s, one has 4.77s, who wins? Just curious not trying to bring any sort of street racing into it, just curiosity
Old 12-19-2007, 04:32 PM
  #2  

 
Stratocaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 11,397
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

The higher geared car will pull on the lower geared car always. It is simple phyics. You only lose mathimatical top speed.
Old 12-19-2007, 04:42 PM
  #3  
Former Moderator

 
CKit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,731
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stratocaster,Dec 19 2007, 05:32 PM
The higher geared car will pull on the lower geared car always. It is simple phyics. You only lose mathimatical top speed.
Is that true? I'd think if the 6th gear was an overdrive gear and very long, changing the final drive and getting to that gear early... and trying to accelerate in an overdrive gear might not be the best.

For example, accelerating in 5th on some cars might be better than accelerating in 6th with a higher final drive.
Old 12-19-2007, 04:49 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
qbmurderer13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 2,140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ive also been curious about this, at what point (or speed) do the geared cars start accelerating slower than a car with stock gears?

Another scenario i can add here. stock s2k vs 4.77 s2k from a 50mph roll? or even a 4.44 vs a 4.77 from a 60mph roll?
Old 12-19-2007, 05:12 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
INTJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 8,504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CKit,Dec 19 2007, 05:42 PM
Is that true? I'd think if the 6th gear was an overdrive gear and very long, changing the final drive and getting to that gear early... and trying to accelerate in an overdrive gear might not be the best.

For example, accelerating in 5th on some cars might be better than accelerating in 6th with a higher final drive.
Yep, and the reason for that is the actual gearing...

Having numerically higher ratio final gear equals the same total ratio or better than the stock ratio in an a lower gear, so the acceleration is better. So (without running through the chart) You have more torque for each gear equivalent to the lower gear in a stock car.

This was well hashed out and some guy ran a really good gear comparision to termanl speed in the archives.
Old 12-19-2007, 10:39 PM
  #6  
Registered User

 
jyeung528's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Temple City
Posts: 8,595
Likes: 0
Received 52 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

i wouldn't say you'd have more torque...just a gearing advantage.

if you had more torque, it would show up on a dyno...but it doesn't...
Old 12-20-2007, 08:17 AM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
AP2S2.2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thanks guys thats exactly what i was looking for, I had always assumed that to be true till some morons post that they lost top end and for some stupid reason i actually began to doubt physics itself... O well, 4.77s it is hahaha
Old 12-21-2007, 08:49 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
Errrrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm thinking 4.56s for my Ap2. You really think the 4.77s won't get annoying? You have to shift into 5th for the 1/4 mile. For an Ap1 I would get 4.77s for sure. If you rev to 8500rpms it would be ok I guess.
Old 12-21-2007, 09:13 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
mikegarrison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Covington WA, USA
Posts: 22,888
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CKit,Dec 19 2007, 05:42 PM
Is that true?
No, it is not.

At any given speed, your acceleration is determined by your available power, your weight, and the drag. Gearing directly affects none of those.

Keep the engine in the powerband and you'll get about the same acceleration no matter what your final drive ratio is.
Old 12-21-2007, 09:24 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
street_ruler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jyeung528,Dec 19 2007, 11:39 PM
i wouldn't say you'd have more torque...just a gearing advantage.

if you had more torque, it would show up on a dyno...but it doesn't...
yes it does have more tq. the nubers on a dyno are adjusted to take into account gearing. when it comes to physical power at the wheels the tq is actually like 1400lbs due to gearing. thus why tractors are like 14:1 gear ratios

oh and if someone ever says tq is all that matters ask em to race you in a tractor.


Quick Reply: Not Another S2000 Gear post!?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:29 AM.