S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

Oversteer argument question?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 22, 2009 | 06:37 AM
  #1  
dedonderosa's Avatar
Thread Starter
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,240
Likes: 85
Default Oversteer argument question?

ok well my buddy and i are having this argument.. hes got an 08 stock s2 and he wants to lower it on espilers and put some 17x9's in the back... and i told him the espilers have a stiffer spring rate and that will create more oversteer... hes telling me that the 17x9's in the back will help reduce the oversteer cause they will have more grip.... whats you opinons on this topic lmk thanks guys
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2009 | 09:12 AM
  #2  
S20004ME_PDX's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 0
From: PDX
Default

I'm not sure, but I think if the spring rate on the front and rear is kept to the same ratio as stock except they're just stiffer, it should be okay.

I do know for sure that if you go wider on your rear tires, you will have less oversteer due to more rear traction. However, the downside to that is, when you do cause an oversteer with wider rear tires, the effect is much more dramatic and harder to recover from.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2009 | 09:23 AM
  #3  
XtC-604's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 998
Likes: 3
From: Vancouver
Default

Originally Posted by S20004ME_PDX,Jul 22 2009, 09:12 AM
I'm not sure, but I think if the spring rate on the front and rear is kept to the same ratio as stock except they're just stiffer, it should be okay.

I do know for sure that if you go wider on your rear tires, you will have less oversteer due to more rear traction. However, the downside to that is, when you do cause an oversteer with wider rear tires, the effect is much more dramatic and harder to recover from.
well, yes. But also unless you're an idiot or tracking, you won't get it to that state, with say fat wide tires 10", cause the S2K has like zero torque compared to say a STI or an AMG or a M
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2009 | 04:35 AM
  #4  
vtec9's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,106
Likes: 5
From: Connecticut
Default

You're both right. Spring rates will change from approx

Fr: 275 - Rr: 226

to

Fr: 313.6 - Rr: 392

Thats a big increase in the rear which will lead to more oversteer, but will be counteracted by a wider rear tire. The wheel width doesn't matter, only the tire's ultimate contact patch.

Reply
Old Jul 23, 2009 | 06:17 PM
  #5  
iam7head's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,692
Likes: 3
From: Pasadena, SOCAL
Default

Originally Posted by vtec9,Jul 23 2009, 04:35 AM
You're both right. Spring rates will change from approx

Fr: 275 - Rr: 226

to

Fr: 313.6 - Rr: 392

Thats a big increase in the rear which will lead to more oversteer, but will be counteracted by a wider rear tire. The wheel width doesn't matter, only the tire's ultimate contact patch.
yes and no, tire width and wheel width goes hand in hand

if you over stuff or stretch the tire, you'll have a deformed tire patch = mushy tire wall or sh-tty contact.

the biggest question is that why he want a mismatched spring? did you mention to him that the damper valving and swaybar are suppose to work together?
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2009 | 07:50 PM
  #6  
shotgunjimmy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,504
Likes: 0
From: Little Rock, Arkansas
Default

as long as he leaves the VSA on he should be ok, other than the mismatched spring rates / damper rates / sway bar stiffness.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
austincrx
S2000 Racing and Competition
21
Apr 21, 2017 06:12 AM
Syncmaster
Wheels and Tires
4
Mar 25, 2016 07:33 PM
s2konroids
UK & Ireland S2000 Community
3
Oct 27, 2008 06:26 AM
THAGR81
S2000 Under The Hood
4
Jan 14, 2004 08:48 PM
blureds2k
S2000 Under The Hood
1
Dec 11, 2002 03:52 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:46 AM.