if you do the math you'd find that it is correct.

psst, your sign fell off

 

I did do the calculations on a spreadsheet, and I come up with the same results that Unabageler posted. However, I question these results because if these numbers are correct, then my speedometer reads 10% LOW. Everything I have seen on this topic shows that the speedometer on the S2000 reads HIGH It wouldn't surprise me if the S2000 had an analog speedo, but it doesn't. How could a digital speedo read diferently from one car to the next, when it is just counting the bumps on a spinning shaft over time?

BTW I am not trying to piss anyone off. If Unabageler wants to call his info crap, then it is only polite for me to call it crap as well.

 

What sign are you referring to?

 

HEHE! Now that would be a fuuny site on the freeway!

I've never gone over 5-10 mph in reverse. Anyone here ever max out reverse???

 

[QUOTE]Originally posted by 9000RED
[B]


HEHE! Now that would be a fuuny site on the freeway!

 

[QUOTE]Originally posted by twohoos
[B]Don't take either the speedo or tach readings as dead-on accurate.

 

I'm referring to the sign that tells me that all this information needs to be repeated again.

 

[QUOTE]Originally posted by 9000RED
[B]


HEHE! Now that would be a fuuny site on the freeway!

 

[QUOTE]Originally posted by infinitebass
[B]

I actually do believe you are incorrect. If they are wrong, they are incredibly close. And it's never wise to piss off a moderator.

If you think they are wrong, its not hard to figure out yourself.