S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

Stationary Rev Limit?

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 28, 2012 | 12:49 AM
  #1  
Cozzi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Default Stationary Rev Limit?

I used to own an EP3 a few years back which had a rev limit stopping you from going into vtec whilst stationary.

Does the S2000 have one of those, or is it supposed to as I tried last night to rev and it went past the 5k mark but im not sure how much by.

I would have thought it should have one of these?
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2012 | 01:14 AM
  #2  
s2000maniac's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,032
Likes: 15
Default

It doesn't, and you shouldn't rev the s2k while its not moving because its very bad for the motor.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2012 | 01:24 AM
  #3  
Cozzi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by s2000maniac
It doesn't, and you shouldn't rev the s2k while its not moving because its very bad for the motor.
Ill keep that in mind, whats the reason behind that?

Thanks for the response!
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2012 | 08:14 AM
  #4  
realblag's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 1
From: out in the sticks, Tennessee
Default

S2000 will rev to redline but won't go into VTEC. The ECU has to see a certain speed(16mph?) from the speed sensor before VTEC will engage. To my knowledge, all VTEC engines(on the stock ECU) work this way.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2012 | 09:18 AM
  #5  
MBHs2k's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,875
Likes: 5
From: Santa Clartia, Ca
Default

Yeah my BB6 prelude would not engage VTEC unless it was in gear.
S2000 maniac- how would it ruin the motor? Assuming it was properly warmed up and everything I would think it would be no different than while moving.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2012 | 11:12 AM
  #6  
mazelmazelgoodthings's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
From: Morristown
Default

I was always under the impression that revving a motor without any load is bad for it. just excessive unnecessary wear on the engine internals.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2012 | 01:41 PM
  #7  
Kmelthratter's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 181
Likes: 4
From: Northern California
Default

I have heard that the lack of dynamic compression pushing back on the pistons puts much more load on the rods, not sure if it is true. I wouldn't imagine that it is catastrophic, it is a normal part of changing gears and launching at the track.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2012 | 07:28 PM
  #8  
Billman250's Avatar
Moderator
Active Streak: 30 Days
Active Streak: 120 Days
Liked
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 22,386
Likes: 1,838
From: Long Island, New York
Default

Why even ask.

Free revving is one of the worst things you can do to an engine. You are better off parking into a brick wall and burning the tires.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2012 | 04:42 AM
  #9  
spectacle's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,894
Likes: 9
From: Tampa, FL
Default

Lot of speculation of why its "so bad", but no actual evidence to support it.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2012 | 06:17 AM
  #10  
Clark's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 1
From: Chicago
Default

how much of this is one doing to really matter anyway? Isn't this a whole discussion about nothing? So some free revs on occasion in the garage if listening for something, or childish revs at a stoplight (like that 7k rev will sound soo impressive at a stop) clearly does no serious harm to the engine. So is some moron literally holding it at high rpm for 5, 10 or more minutes? Hours?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:23 PM.