S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

Why valves do not float - what cracks retainers

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 29, 2012 | 07:30 PM
  #11  
zeroptzero's Avatar
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Liked
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 29,883
Likes: 5,427
From: Ontario Canada
Default

Originally Posted by davidc1
Originally Posted by JFUSION' timestamp='1348970905' post='22047096
I think he had a few Heinekens when he was writing it, lol . j\k
heh heh....I always like the cool tops on the Grolsch bottle better!
^ Best bottles for sure, I think I have about 50 of them in my basement, including one big ass one. We re-use them to preserve our home-made spaghetti sauce each year, lol.
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2012 | 09:59 PM
  #12  
nofearofdanger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,807
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne
Default

I don't know why anyone would think this myth was true in the first place. For the valve to float for so long that the lobe could make an entire revolution to cause it to strike the top of the valve would be crazy. The valve spring should have guided it back onto the profile of the lobe before that occurred somewhere in the revolution of the lobe. Either that or the top of the piston would have smacked into the bottom of the valve. If you subject the assembly to an obscene amount of rpm of course the retainer is going to crack. The fact that it doesn't just snap is already an engineering marvel!
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2012 | 12:18 AM
  #13  
SpitfireS's Avatar
Thread Starter
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,953
Likes: 25
From: 17 ft below sea level.
Default

Originally Posted by nofearofdanger
What makes you think it was copied? Maybe the different font meant he wrote it in a word processing program before he pasted it onto here... who knows
Either way, good read.
Thank you.
You're right about the font.
I wrote it in MSWord.

Originally Posted by nofearofdanger
I don't know why anyone would think this myth was true in the first place.
It is still a polular myth.
It pops up every now & then.
It also justifies the decision to just replace cracked retainers without checking the seats and guides, IOW replace retainers without removing the head.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2012 | 12:23 AM
  #14  
SpitfireS's Avatar
Thread Starter
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,953
Likes: 25
From: 17 ft below sea level.
Default

Originally Posted by davidc1
And some of it simply doesn't make sense because of the bad English. Like this:

Another thing about AP1 (early F20) retainers: they are not weak.A weak retainer would break in 2 pieces as soon as the crack is there.

So....a crack is there....but it's not "weak"....but it's cracked.....but it's not in two pieces [or three or four, or "quarters" (like in the beginning of the post, whatever that meant)]....so it's not weak....but it's cracked....don't get it....

Its clear.... you.... didn't get.... it.
And be so kind to point out the bad English.

But the valves have dropped slightly.....and some more so....and people have had toasted engines.....so what are AP1's subjected to that AP2's aren't?
Did I allready mention that... you... didn't ... get.... it?
Valves do not drop - not even slighty - because of cracked retainers.
A cracked retainer moves up the valve stem.

Oh well...



edit: typo.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2012 | 01:08 AM
  #15  
nofearofdanger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,807
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne
Default

Thanks for clarifying publicly! This myth needs to be dispelled.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2012 | 01:17 AM
  #16  
INDYMAC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 4
From: Magnolia, TX
Default

Thanks for posting Spitfire. I always enjoy your posts, but don't always agree. I do wish I had taken a ME class or two in college though. You're over my head most of the time!



BTW- your English writing skills are better than 99% of Americans!
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2012 | 04:39 AM
  #17  
dwight's Avatar
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,207
Likes: 7
From: Long Island
Default

Originally Posted by INDYMAC
Thanks for posting Spitfire. I always enjoy your posts, but don't always agree. I do wish I had taken a ME class or two in college though. You're over my head most of the time!

BTW- your English writing skills are better than 99% of Americans!
If you didn't take 2-3 semesters of calculus and a semester of physics then one or two mechanical engineering classes wouldn't help.

And you don't need to take college classes to learn something. If you math and physics are solid, you can start learning statics on your own.
http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mechanica...s-i-fall-2006/
http://emweb.unl.edu/NEGAHBAN/EM223/Intro.htm
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2012 | 05:44 AM
  #18  
SgtB's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,947
Likes: 8
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

So it is float? The spring isn't strong enough to follow the cam back up and hits hard? It makes sense that a springs spring rate can be overpowered and a small delay on return will be added from inertia. I'm surprised people would think the valve could float an entire revolution though.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2012 | 09:11 AM
  #19  
crisskro's Avatar
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 206
Likes: 2
Default

What should I tell honda to check for? All I know so far is "order these for me and change them during the valve adjustment - on the intake side"
14765-PRB-A01 8 retainers
14781-PCX-004 16 cotters

What else should I tell them?
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2012 | 10:17 AM
  #20  
Vtakanonymous's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Good read sir! I've read a lot about the subject/myth and have been saving to replace the valve springs and retainers for my next big maintenance project ( albeit using some nice aftermarket goodies over the oem prospects). LOL @ the dude citing him for grammatical errors and then goes onto have a plethora of discrepancies in his own sentence.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:48 AM.