S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

Wideband O2 Sensor Controller

Thread Tools
 
Old Dec 28, 2004 | 12:47 PM
  #1  
Dolemike's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,867
Likes: 0
From: High Point
Default Wideband O2 Sensor Controller

While roaming thru various internet pages I stumbled across this product made by PLX devices, its a Wideband o2 sensor controller installed in a 2004 S2000. While my car experiences have not led me down the o2 road (until now), Im not sure what it does or why exactly someone would need it. Is it basically an o2 simulator, but then I saw it still uses an o2 sensor. Hopefully someone will find this product useful or can explain to me what its specific use is, (If not an o2 simulator). Thanks heres the link http://www.plxdevices.com/M-Series_Videos.htm

Midway down the page
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2004 | 01:12 PM
  #2  
revhi's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 2
From: Used Jersey
Default

Its a wide band o2, it gives you a air fuel reading by numbers, like 11 to 1. Its so you can tune your car without a dyno. Im looking for a decently priced one.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2004 | 01:13 PM
  #3  
AusS2000's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,809
Likes: 15
From: Sydney
Default

The 02 sensor in our car is a fairly rough device. It's slow to react and not particularly accurate. That is why as soon as we hit the throttle our car comes out of closed loop tuning (using the sensor) and goes back to it's internal tables for fuel and timing.

A wideband is a far more accurate device. Part of this is that it is kept at a constant temperature and volatge. It is the controller unit that controls the temperature and voltage across the unit and also reads the signal back from it. Some controllers also modify this signal so it is compatible with stock ECUs.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2004 | 01:17 PM
  #4  
Dolemike's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,867
Likes: 0
From: High Point
Default

So this thing is a pretty good thing to have eh? So one could expect a couple more ponies and improved throttle response out of a product such as this? Is this a totally different product than the VAFC?
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2004 | 01:18 PM
  #5  
AusS2000's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,809
Likes: 15
From: Sydney
Default

The name also suggests another difference. A Narrowband only measures A/F around the point of stoichemetry (14.7:1) in a narrow range. A wideband, as the name suggests, can measure values much higher and lower than a narow band.

Another thing this particular controller provides is logging of data and an interface for a PC.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2004 | 01:23 PM
  #6  
AusS2000's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 30,809
Likes: 15
From: Sydney
Default

I wouldn't expect anything much out of this other than a window to your cars tuning. They are suggesting it provides slightly more accurate data to the ECU in closed loop but that won't make a difference in open loop (ie. when you put your foot down) and that's when you want more of them aforementioned ponies.

It is also not a V-AFC. Infact I would say they are two products that kind of compliment each other because you shouldn't tune a V-AFC without a good idea of your A/F ratio. That said, these particular devices are a lot of money if you only intend to install a $300 V-AFC. I have a wideband on the way but it is for my AEM EMS.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2004 | 01:30 PM
  #7  
Dolemike's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,867
Likes: 0
From: High Point
Default

Ahhhh, ok
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Dec 29, 2004 | 05:41 AM
  #8  
Gernby's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 19
Default

Originally Posted by AusS2000,Dec 28 2004, 04:13 PM
The 02 sensor in our car is a fairly rough device. It's slow to react and not particularly accurate. That is why as soon as we hit the throttle our car comes out of closed loop tuning (using the sensor) and goes back to it's internal tables for fuel and timing.

A wideband is a far more accurate device. Part of this is that it is kept at a constant temperature and volatge. It is the controller unit that controls the temperature and voltage across the unit and also reads the signal back from it. Some controllers also modify this signal so it is compatible with stock ECUs.
I disagree. Narroband O2s are much more consistant than Wideband O2s. Widebands are VERY sensitive to temperature and fouling. They require much more frequent sensor replacement and periodic calibration.

As already stated they are just usefull for tuning, and are most usefull for tuning at wide open throttle. Widebands give a linear response to changes in air / fuel, while narrowband O2s are more like a switch (above or below 14.7:1). For example, the output of a narrowband O2 at 14.2:1 is the same as it is at 10:1 and the output at 15.2:1 is the same as it is at 20:1.

I have a wideband O2 for tuning, but I still let the ECU use the narrowband. I think this will give the best / most consistant results.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
F20C_S2k
Vancouver BC S2000 Owners
0
Mar 26, 2009 12:44 PM
AROD
New York - Metro New York S2000 Owners
0
May 28, 2007 12:16 PM
*spoon*
S2000 Under The Hood
0
Feb 5, 2006 11:28 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:13 PM.