S2000 Vintage Owners Knowledge, age and life experiences represent the members of the Vintage Owners

Is the Camry that bad a car?

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 08:09 AM
  #21  
Morris's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,401
Likes: 1,104
From: Napa
Default

I leased a 1996 Camry and for 3 years never did a thing but change the oil and add gas. It was comfortable and if you just want to get from here to there, you can't beat it. Same with my 2 4Runners, am on the last year of my lease of a 2004 Sport, which doesn't handle bad for a small SUV and really gets up and goes. Toyota builds good cars. When my lease is up, I'm moving to the RAV, same engine I now have but lighter (quicker) and smaller.
BTW did Patty ever replace her car, and with what? She thought the RAV moved pretty well too.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 08:17 AM
  #22  
paS2K's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 18,885
Likes: 33
From: Philly (Narberth)
Default

Originally Posted by dlq04,Mar 29 2007, 07:43 AM
The same can be said for most of the US car models today; at least for me. But there was a time:

http://www.gmphotostore.com/products...1237&display=0
Guess that I'm old-fashioned, Dave, but I the tail-fin era

Thanks for sharing that site....a bit of eye candy for tail fishers
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 08:27 AM
  #23  
paS2K's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 18,885
Likes: 33
From: Philly (Narberth)
Default

How about a driver event and POLL for the same company's HYBRIDS:

Prius
Civic
Escape

Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 09:12 AM
  #24  
Conedodger's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,471
Likes: 35
From: Upstate NY
Default

My wife has a 1999 Camry Solara. Best car we've ever owned. The quality and reliability are amazing. In 125k miles we've done the following:

Brake pads once (Original rotors and calipers)
Timing belt (Preventative maintenance)
Struts (Just done at 125k)
Passenger door lock actuator (Just done at 125k)

Tires and oil changes of course.

With the exception of the timing belt, it has never been to a shop for repair.

Still has the original battery, exhaust, spark plugs!

After 9 salt laden winters, no rust!

Best part? We finished the payments in October 2001.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 09:36 AM
  #25  
WhiteS2k's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by ralper,Mar 29 2007, 08:19 PM
Because, I think, that when your product has no credibility the best way to advertise is to knock the product that does have credibility. Your product can't reach up to the higher level, so you attempt to bring the higher level down.
But why just knock the Camry and not the Accord? If it was just a 2-car comparison, Fusion vs. Accord, the numbers would be believable -- OK, so they are biased in favor of the Ford, but the Accord is not far behind. But by knocking the Camry so badly, it made the whole survey unrealistic. Anyone who looks at the chart will automatically say: "That can't be right, I just cannot believe Ford with their claims." So by knocking the Camry (a constant best seller in America) so badly, Ford makes itself look really stupid.

I can believe that the Fusion is better than the Accord, I can even believe it is better than the Camry (in the areas being compared). But is it more than twice better (as the chart would have you believe)? Probably not.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2007 | 05:21 PM
  #26  
Emil St-Hilaire's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
Active Streak: 30 Days
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 22,683
Likes: 490
From: St-Redempteur,Qc.
Default

Originally Posted by Emil St-Hilaire,Mar 29 2007, 07:35 PM
people used to like those nice looking old Buicks!!!
What were they called ???Streetmasters,???
With the portholes on the front fenders,???
Got it;"Roadmasters" with portholes and big fins.!!!
Awesome cars,in the fifties.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2007 | 07:04 AM
  #27  
dlq04's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 46,001
Likes: 8,484
From: Mish-she-gan
Default

Consumers Report just published its latest findings on cars. Lots and lots of good info. Here's just a small sample.

TEST RESULTS VS. RELIABILITY

If the only things that mattered to a car buyer were performance, comfort, and safety, Volkswagen would be at the top of the heap. Its Volkswagen and Audi models do well in handling, braking, and standard safety features. But few VWs have decent reliability.

Mercedes-Benz is an even more striking example. Its cars have the fourth-highest average test score at 77. They handle well, are nicely finished, and ride comfortably. But none has good-enough reliability to be recommended. By contrast, Toyotas have been very reliable, but some models such as the FJ Cruiser SUV and Yaris subcompact were disappointing in our tests.

Cars from Detroit automakers range across the lot in reliability. Ford has a number of good cars that did well in our survey, but about a quarter of the Ford products we have tested had below average reliability. GM also builds some vehicles that did well in reliability, but about one-third of the tested GM vehicles were rated below average.

While our surveys show that reliability of new American cars and trucks has been getting closer to the levels of Japanese vehicles, Cole says there is a limit to easy improvements.

Overall we recommend a much smaller percentage of U.S. cars than Japanese makes (37 percent vs. 80 percent), mainly because their reliability is hit-or-miss, not consistent like that of vehicles from some Japanese companies. We do not recommend models with below-average reliability. American vehicles tend to be more reliable than those from Europe. The consistently high reliability of some Japanese companies, such as Honda, Subaru, and Toyota, allows us to recommend their new models.


THE JAPANESE MYTH

Honda and Toyota are lauded for their reliability and have built a number of high-rated models, including 7 of our 10 Top Picks. But we found that not all Japanese cars excel.

Reply
Old Mar 31, 2007 | 02:36 PM
  #28  
RC - Ryder's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,563
Likes: 0
From: Marblehead
Default

Good info, but not a comment about resale value? For some and especially those who lease it may not be an issue, but it is to me.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2007 | 03:33 PM
  #29  
paS2K's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 18,885
Likes: 33
From: Philly (Narberth)
Post

Originally Posted by dlq04,Mar 31 2007, 10:04 AM
Consumers Report just published its latest findings on cars....

HOW U.S. MAKERS STACK UP.....and Cadillac CTS scored well in our tests......

Chrysler.....One of our engineers likened sitting in a Caliber to being in a plastic ice cooler.......
Two excerpts:

A for Dave's Caddie....

A for the Dodge-Not-Quite-.22Calibre
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2007 | 05:31 AM
  #30  
dlq04's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 46,001
Likes: 8,484
From: Mish-she-gan
Default

Some more from CR on the topic:

MOST IMPRESSIVE

Ford Fusion/Mercury Milan

As expected, these replacements for the Taurus and Sable are practical and roomy. But we were unexpectedly impressed with their nimble handling and comfortable ride, which make them feel more like expensive European cars. Unlike many new cars in their first year, their reliability has been excellent.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:51 AM.