S2000 Vintage Owners Knowledge, age and life experiences represent the members of the Vintage Owners

fun facts about CO2

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 3, 2009 | 08:34 PM
  #1  
cordycord's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default fun facts about CO2

First, do you know that carbon dioxide (CO2) in our atmosphere is:

--only slightly more than 1/3rd of 1/10th of 1 percent?
--just recovering from the lowest level in the history of the earth?
--the source of carbon for all life forms, on land or in the sea?
--only slightly above the suffocation level for green plants?
--a fraction of the level for which evolution designed plants?
--so low as to cause some people breathing problems?
--increased by 130 times and more when administered to sick patients?
--considered a pollutant by the U.S. Supreme Court?

Over the last 350 million years CO2 has varied by 10 fold, approximately 250 ppm to 2,500 ppm with an average level of 1,500 ppm. This average level happens to be the optimum level for plants, it seems by evolutionary design, and is the reason that this level of CO2 is used in greenhouses Since plants and animals evolved together it's likely that humans also evolved to function best at some higher level. However, at 380 ppm we are not far from the lower end of that 10 fold range.

Has anyone heard this before? It's copied from a reliable source, but there wasn't any attribution.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2009 | 12:02 AM
  #2  
Kyras's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 45,956
Likes: 5,449
From: Loveland, CO
Default



--only slightly above the suffocation level for green plants?

That sounds like green plants would be suffocating if the level is above their suffocation level. Am I reading this wrong?


...And I haven't heard this before but it's not the kind of thing I'd be looking for.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2009 | 03:55 AM
  #3  
boltonblue's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 37,581
Likes: 6,377
From: bolton
Default

did you know that solid CO2 better known as dry ice, will extract the water from an alcohol / water / fruit juice solution resulting in a much higher concentration of alcohol in the mixture?

on campus they referred to this particular form as a hairy buffalo.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2009 | 05:19 AM
  #4  
Zippy's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,579
Likes: 157
From: West Deptford NJ
Default

Originally Posted by cordycord,Mar 4 2009, 12:34 AM
It's copied from a reliable source, but there wasn't any attribution.
Then how can it be reliable? Even, "As spoken by Fred at CPAC" would give it some recognition.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2009 | 05:33 AM
  #5  
Legal Bill's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 34,131
Likes: 126
From: Canton, MA
Default

Originally Posted by Zippy,Mar 4 2009, 09:19 AM
Then how can it be reliable? Even, "As spoken by Fred at CPAC" would give it some recognition.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2009 | 06:59 AM
  #6  
tof's Avatar
tof
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,419
Likes: 2,639
From: Long Beach, MS
Default

Originally Posted by Kyras,Mar 4 2009, 01:02 AM


--only slightly above the suffocation level for green plants?

That sounds like green plants would be suffocating if the level is above their suffocation level. Am I reading this wrong?


...And I haven't heard this before but it's not the kind of thing I'd be looking for.
Since plants take in CO2 and strip the carbon atoms to exhale oxygen this makes sense. It is like saying that the level of oxygen in the atmosphere is just above suffocation level for people. If it were lower we would suffocate.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2009 | 07:49 AM
  #7  
Kyras's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 45,956
Likes: 5,449
From: Loveland, CO
Default

Originally Posted by tof,Mar 4 2009, 07:59 AM
Since plants take in CO2 and strip the carbon atoms to exhale oxygen this makes sense. It is like saying that the level of oxygen in the atmosphere is just above suffocation level for people. If it were lower we would suffocate.
Ah, thank you, tof.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2009 | 08:14 AM
  #8  
CaptainMike's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,526
Likes: 5
From: Hurricane City, FL
Default

Originally Posted by cordycord,Mar 4 2009, 12:34 AM
First, do you know that carbon dioxide (CO2) in our atmosphere is:

--only slightly more than 1/3rd of 1/10th of 1 percent?
--just recovering from the lowest level in the history of the earth?
--the source of carbon for all life forms, on land or in the sea?
--only slightly above the suffocation level for green plants?
--a fraction of the level for which evolution designed plants?
--so low as to cause some people breathing problems?
--increased by 130 times and more when administered to sick patients?
--considered a pollutant by the U.S. Supreme Court?

Over the last 350 million years CO2 has varied by 10 fold, approximately 250 ppm to 2,500 ppm with an average level of 1,500 ppm. This average level happens to be the optimum level for plants, it seems by evolutionary design, and is the reason that this level of CO2 is used in greenhouses Since plants and animals evolved together it's likely that humans also evolved to function best at some higher level. However, at 380 ppm we are not far from the lower end of that 10 fold range.

Has anyone heard this before? It's copied from a reliable source, but there wasn't any attribution.
Ummmm, not so much really. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Co...ature-plot.svg
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2009 | 08:31 AM
  #9  
mikegarrison's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 22,888
Likes: 3
From: Covington WA, USA
Default

Originally Posted by CaptainMike,Mar 4 2009, 09:14 AM
Ummmm, not so much really
Did you all know that space aliens have visited us hundreds of times in the past year?

I heard it from a reliable source, but I don't have any attribution....

Cordy's "facts" are the usual mishmash of some things outright wrong, some things true but distorted in meaning, and some things true tossed in as cover to make the rest of it more palatable.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2009 | 09:28 AM
  #10  
DrCloud's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,077
Likes: 0
From: EstesPark/BocaRaton
Default

Building inspectors think this:

Originally Posted by inspect-ny.com
Toxic levels of carbon dioxide: at levels above 5%, concentration CO2 is directly toxic. [At lower levels we may be seeing effects of a reduction in the relative amount of oxygen rather than direct toxicity of CO2.]
A factor of 130 increase from ambient yields a 5.2% CO2 fraction.

I guess those patients who get this are maybe the ones on death row?

And, given the plot that Mike pointed to, how come all the plants (for which current ambient CO2 levels are near the "suffocation" threshold) didn't die several times over when the level was down around half the present amount? (For all of you who are getting the winter grays and browns, take it from me -- there's lots of green out there.)

How crap like this is thought to be credible just amazes me -- or maybe not, given the source in the internet rumor mill and how it wound up here.

And ...
Originally Posted by tof
It is like saying that the level of oxygen in the atmosphere is just above suffocation level for people. If it were lower we would suffocate.
"Just above"?

In the foothills west of Denver, there's about 80% as much oxygen as at sea level. People of all ages live there quite happily. A few miles north, on top of Long's Peak, there's about 60% as much oxygen as at sea level. It's a bit of a climb, and almost anyone will be breathing hard at the top, but no one "suffocates."

Credibility seems to be hard to come by these days.

HPH
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:58 AM.