S2000 Vintage Owners Knowledge, age and life experiences represent the members of the Vintage Owners

Net worth gap

Thread Tools
 
Old May 22, 2007 | 03:07 PM
  #21  
Chris Stack's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,668
Likes: 20
From: Arlington Heights, IL
Default

Originally Posted by RC - Ryder,May 22 2007, 03:02 PM
Approximately 1 1/2 -2 years ago, AARP magazine in bold 1/2 inch print and bold color stated that 84% or 87% (I can't remember which one) of ALL seniors have a net worth of less than $250.00 DOLLARS at the time of their death. I'm not kidding. I suggest you make yourself as smart as possible on the subject. Spend it, give it away, or lose it!
After seeing the outright lies and hatchet jobs AARP did on the proposed Social Security revisions (no matter your personal view on the suggested plans, you have to admit NO ONE advocated taking anything from those currently receiving SS), I am loathe to believe ANY statistic given by AARP.
Reply
Old May 22, 2007 | 05:59 PM
  #22  
RC - Ryder's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,563
Likes: 0
From: Marblehead
Default

I'm pretty high on the skepticism list myself; just reporting what I saw. Hope someone else can confirm, being that I'm no longer an AARP member. You got to admit that would be an eye opener if true?
Reply
Old May 23, 2007 | 05:25 AM
  #23  
PLYRS 3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 23,749
Likes: 3
From: Erock's my boat!
Default

Originally Posted by Legal Bill,May 22 2007, 03:45 PM
I have found that when I substitute my personal experience for contradictory national data, I am almost always wrong, but your experience may differ.

Many people think they have a greater worth due to all the things they own. When you deduct the liabilities, you may find that you have a negative net worth. In simplistic terms, a person with a million dollars worth of toys, no free cash and a million dollars of debt has less net worth than a person with $10 in hand and nothing else. The person with $10 may seem to have a lot less net worth based on appearances.

Further, a true net worth analysis compares your current worth to that of others at the same moment in time. Comparing your worth today with your parent's worth at the same age, while interesting, isn't the point and can be difficult to adjust for inflation, etc. And just because your parents may have been quite poor doesn't mean they were representative of the population.
Bill, i'm not sure i understand your point.

i know what "net worth" is (i'm an accountant). i also realize i simplified the situation (i.e. i didn't explicitly bring up inflation).

but even factoring in inflation, my experience remains.

i would give outright examples, but it may come across as "bragging"....
Reply
Old May 23, 2007 | 06:42 AM
  #24  
DiamondDave2005's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,897
Likes: 1
From: Cherry Hill, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Legal Bill,May 21 2007, 02:02 PM
What country do they live in? I'm not sure, but over 10 years, that looks something like 40% compound escalation.
They live just north of Dublin city, Ireland.

Here's a Google pic:

http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&ll=53.4310...8&t=k&z=15&om=1

When they bought the house in 1973, it cost <US$18,000.

Cons in 1973: There was lousy bus service, no train service, and it was 10 miles from the city center.

Pros in 2007: It has great bus service, train service, and is only 10 miles from the city center.

It also has a nice beach and three championship golf courses
Reply
Old May 23, 2007 | 07:22 AM
  #25  
Conedodger's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,471
Likes: 35
From: Upstate NY
Default

Originally Posted by RC - Ryder,May 22 2007, 03:02 PM
Approximately 1 1/2 -2 years ago, AARP magazine in bold 1/2 inch print and bold color stated that 84% or 87% (I can't remember which one) of ALL seniors have a net worth of less than $250.00 DOLLARS at the time of their death. I'm not kidding. I suggest you make yourself as smart as possible on the subject. Spend it, give it away, or lose it!
Sounds about perfect to me. A zero dollar net worth at death would be ideal. Of course, this assumes I've survived my spouse.
Reply
Old May 23, 2007 | 05:08 PM
  #26  
Legal Bill's Avatar
Thread Starter
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 34,131
Likes: 126
From: Canton, MA
Default

Originally Posted by PLYRS 3,May 23 2007, 08:25 AM
Bill, i'm not sure i understand your point.

i know what "net worth" is (i'm an accountant). i also realize i simplified the situation (i.e. i didn't explicitly bring up inflation).

but even factoring in inflation, my experience remains.

i would give outright examples, but it may come across as "bragging"....
All I'm saying is your logic is a little myopic. My basic point is simple. If you disagree with national statistics because of your personal situation, you are probably wrong. Let me try a different example. If you and every one you know earns $250,000 a year, but national statistics show that the median income is $60,000, do you doubt the accuracy of the national statistics on the basis that "100% of the people I know earn over $250,000?" Even if you know the incomes of 1,000 people, your sample is invalid and your conclusion is wrong.
Reply
Old May 24, 2007 | 05:18 AM
  #27  
PLYRS 3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 23,749
Likes: 3
From: Erock's my boat!
Default

i wouldn't argue against the income example, as i know it to be more correct than not.

i don't agree with the net worth gap "study" though....
Reply
Old May 24, 2007 | 06:06 AM
  #28  
Chris Stack's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,668
Likes: 20
From: Arlington Heights, IL
Default

Originally Posted by Legal Bill,May 23 2007, 08:08 PM
All I'm saying is your logic is a little myopic. My basic point is simple. If you disagree with national statistics because of your personal situation, you are probably wrong. Let me try a different example. If you and every one you know earns $250,000 a year, but national statistics show that the median income is $60,000, do you doubt the accuracy of the national statistics on the basis that "100% of the people I know earn over $250,000?" Even if you know the incomes of 1,000 people, your sample is invalid and your conclusion is wrong.
This is the same PLYRS 3 who tried to tell me a couple months ago that all kinds of people in the world can afford to buy a $70k BMW 7-series, because he and a couple of his neighbors could. Either something is lost in the translation, or he hasn't ventured very far from his own house.
Reply
Old May 24, 2007 | 09:52 AM
  #29  
boltonblue's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 37,581
Likes: 6,377
From: bolton
Default

Originally Posted by Conedodger,May 23 2007, 11:22 AM
Sounds about perfect to me. A zero dollar net worth at death would be ideal. Of course, this assumes I've survived my spouse.
sounds like the perfect will
" and to my children, being of sound mind and body, I pissed away every last cent. your on your own dears"
Reply
Old May 24, 2007 | 10:30 AM
  #30  
RC - Ryder's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,563
Likes: 0
From: Marblehead
Default

PLYRS3: You're swimming upstream young fellow. Legal Bill's reference if anything is probably a bit low on the "gap." Average "family" income in the US is in the low to mid 40s, which does not leave a lot of assets for building net worth.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:26 PM.