S2000 Vintage Owners Knowledge, age and life experiences represent the members of the Vintage Owners

Retirement planning.

Thread Tools
 
Old May 7, 2006 | 06:22 PM
  #11  
ralper's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 33,155
Likes: 1,638
From: Randolph, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by JonasM,May 7 2006, 08:57 AM
I guess that's why diversification - in all its forms - is a smart strategy overall.

That's also why any advice you get on a forum like this, and online articles, should only be taken as a starting point. Current economic/tax realities change the calculations, as do your own situations & goals.

JonasM
Jonas,

You are absolutely right on both points.

Regardless of most anything else, the smart portfolio is a diversified portfolio.

As to getting advice here, my point in starting these threads was simply to get people thinking. I offered some advice, but my intent was for people to see their attorneys, accountants and advisors. Too often I see clients who always intended to take care of retirement planning, estate planning, and tax planning, and too often they put it off until tomorrow. When tomorrow finally comes, it's too late.

Life is dynamic, situations change, laws change, taxes change. If you don't have some plans made, make them, if you do revisit them every few years to make sure that they are current. Don't wait until tomorrow.
Reply
Old May 8, 2006 | 09:50 AM
  #12  
paS2K's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 18,885
Likes: 33
From: Philly (Narberth)
Default

If your own retirement investment planning is on track, a really smart thing to do for your children.....as soon as they have taxable income:

Fund a ROTH IRA for them....perhaps in a no-load target date mutual fund. This does not reduce your taxable income, but the younger workers are probably not in a high tax bracket....so no matter. I think the allowable contribution is $4k until >50 age. In 40 or 50 years, these small contributions will become real money I've done this for several years for our dtr (still in grad school....only earns pin money) and will start to do it for our son (probably starting in the 2006 tax year).
Reply
Old May 8, 2006 | 10:16 AM
  #13  
Lainey's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 65,275
Likes: 4,606
From: Smalltown
Default

Originally Posted by paS2K,May 8 2006, 01:50 PM
If your own retirement investment planning is on track, a really smart thing to do for your children.....as soon as they have taxable income:

Fund a ROTH IRA for them....perhaps in a no-load target date mutual fund. This does not reduce your taxable income, but the younger workers are probably not in a high tax bracket....so no matter. I think the allowable contribution is $4k until >50 age. In 40 or 50 years, these small contributions will become real money I've done this for several years for our dtr (still in grad school....only earns pin money) and will start to do it for our son (probably starting in the 2006 tax year).
Hey Jerry,

Feel free to fund a ROTH IRA for me as well.
Reply
Old May 8, 2006 | 12:15 PM
  #14  
RC - Ryder's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,563
Likes: 0
From: Marblehead
Default

Ralper: Thanks good points. Certainly no argument from me regarding the estate planning value of Roth IRAs.
Keep in mind that per stats, only 1 in 10 gets any nominal inheritance and only 1 in a 100 has an inheritance in excess of 100k. Wish I still had the reference, but I think it was Forbes. Point is that if you are able to then the Roth IRA is a real value for inheritance/estate planning. On the other hand, not many folks are likely to benefit from this opportunity.
I still say, surprise yourself and do a mock retirement 1040 as part of your retirement planning. My state/dederal taxes are >2000% less than when I was working.
Reply
Old May 8, 2006 | 03:32 PM
  #15  
RedY2KS2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 5,296
Likes: 2
From: Delaware, OH
Default

Originally Posted by RC - Ryder,May 8 2006, 03:15 PM
... My state/dederal taxes are >2000% less than when I was working.
I suspect there's a typo in this statement: 100% less is zero taxes. ;-)
Reply
Old May 8, 2006 | 04:59 PM
  #16  
paS2K's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 18,885
Likes: 33
From: Philly (Narberth)
Default

Originally Posted by Lainey8484,May 8 2006, 01:16 PM
Hey Jerry,

Feel free to fund a ROTH IRA for me as well.
You're in too high a bracket OTOH, it would be a great thing to do for yer grandkids....as soon as they earn some W-2 money....
Reply
Old May 8, 2006 | 05:01 PM
  #17  
paS2K's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 18,885
Likes: 33
From: Philly (Narberth)
Default

Originally Posted by RedY2KS2k,May 8 2006, 06:32 PM
I suspect there's a typo in this statement: 100% less is zero taxes. ;-)
Where is Ralper He starts this thread and then disappears....probably practicing for the puddin' wrassle!
Reply
Old May 8, 2006 | 05:07 PM
  #18  
Lainey's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 65,275
Likes: 4,606
From: Smalltown
Default

Originally Posted by paS2K,May 8 2006, 08:59 PM
You're in too high a bracket OTOH, it would be a great thing to do for yer grandkids....as soon as they earn some W-2 money....
Sorry, Jerry.

We're a LOT younger than you. We are still trying like HE$$ to fund our own retirement. The others will have to fend for themselves for a while longer.
Reply
Old May 9, 2006 | 04:52 AM
  #19  
RC - Ryder's Avatar
Registered User
Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,563
Likes: 0
From: Marblehead
Default

Red Y2KS2K: I suppose I should have said that I'm paying 1/20th the taxes that I used to pay?
Reply
Old May 9, 2006 | 05:58 AM
  #20  
RedY2KS2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 5,296
Likes: 2
From: Delaware, OH
Default

Originally Posted by RC - Ryder,May 9 2006, 07:52 AM
Red Y2KS2K: I suppose I should have said that I'm paying 1/20th the taxes that I used to pay?
That would be 95% less than before. ;-)

And I certainly hope that it works that way for me; however, the ever-increasing property tax rates where I live pretty well preclude that.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:42 AM.