S2000 Vintage Owners Knowledge, age and life experiences represent the members of the Vintage Owners

They don't name them like they used to

Thread Tools
 
Old May 9, 2017 | 04:01 PM
  #1  
dlq04's Avatar
Thread Starter
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 45,737
Likes: 8,262
From: Mish-she-gan
Default They don't name them like they used to

Reply
Old May 9, 2017 | 04:11 PM
  #2  
windhund116's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 11,345
Likes: 1,791
Default

And no one wears hats, these days. Doesn't his head size seem a bit out of proportion, to the car?
Reply
Old May 10, 2017 | 03:51 AM
  #3  
boltonblue's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 37,389
Likes: 6,302
From: bolton
Default

obviously prior to photoshop.
Reply
Old May 10, 2017 | 05:33 AM
  #4  
S2KRAY's Avatar
Member (Premium)
25 Year Member
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 9,689
Likes: 1,160
From: Lewes, DE
Default

Originally Posted by windhund116
And no one wears hats, these days. Doesn't his head size seem a bit out of proportion, to the car?
Should have been in a Chrysler Imperial. Better proportions.
Reply
Old May 10, 2017 | 09:57 AM
  #5  
JBamin's Avatar
Registered User
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 332
Likes: 83
From: Ohio
Default

at least they didn't bring it back as a compact... (poor Dart guys)
Reply
Old May 11, 2017 | 06:34 AM
  #6  
S1997's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 17,122
Likes: 629
From: Houston/Durango
Default

I think 1959 was the wildest year of all the 50s for excessive size and style in American autos -- haha and in choice of monikers! :
Reply
Old May 12, 2017 | 07:06 AM
  #7  
Zippy's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,579
Likes: 157
From: West Deptford NJ
Default

Back seats aren't big enough for a Chrysler Climax anymore.
Reply
Old May 12, 2017 | 10:57 AM
  #8  
S2KRAY's Avatar
Member (Premium)
25 Year Member
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 9,689
Likes: 1,160
From: Lewes, DE
Default

Try a VW.
Reply
Old May 12, 2017 | 12:01 PM
  #9  
tof's Avatar
tof
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 16,354
Likes: 2,609
From: Long Beach, MS
Default

Dave, you're right. Now they mostly just number them.

Jim, I would amend to "58/59, to better include GM. 58 Chevy was kind of over-the-top in its way. Pontiac and Buick had some pretty wild offerings in 58 as well.
Reply
Old May 12, 2017 | 12:55 PM
  #10  
The Raptor's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 59,370
Likes: 1,615
From: La Crescenta, CA
Default

Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:02 PM.