Will re-post this subject after the hearing

 

Feedback; sympathies on all counts!

Well, he could've put it down as 99, but he was clearly looking for entrapment. Sad little twat.

Best of British - and to your G/F!

 

Thanks Nick... sorry about editing the post, just thought it better safe until afterwards but thanks again

 

Why "clearly" looking for entrapment? And why is the copper a "sad little twat" for doing his job, if that's what the evidence showed?

I sympathise with the OP - especially given the reason for the journey at that speed - but I fail to see why the automatic assumption that the copper was out to persecute motorists and doing anything other than what he is paid to do....

EDIT: At 30mph over the limit, you should prepare yourself for a ban - the presumption is that a ban should be applied unless you can show them that there's a good reason why they shouldn't. It IS possible to avoid it though - my brother got done at 92 in a 60 and managed, doing his own plea in mitigation, to get away with 5 points (he was on 6 already and the beaks thought this might give him a reason not to do it again!) and a hefty fine.

 

Why leave the post live when nobody else can see what the f**k its about anyway??

 

I read it before the edit and if plod where to read it it could compromise the case

 

Remove it all then !!

 

Or close it to stop us

 

Stop us what