Southern Ontario S2000 Owners Southern Ontario S2000 Owners forum including Toronto, Kitchener/Waterloo, Hamilton and surrounding area

Saab School - Oct 8th

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 28, 2004 | 08:17 AM
  #11  
Mannn's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,076
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Default

too lazy to change tires... LOL
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2004 | 08:19 AM
  #12  
PLYRS 3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 23,749
Likes: 3
From: Erock's my boat!
Default

ok, let me know....i'd be up for that.

i guess another way to search would be to look for 60-80 treadwear...

stockers are 140.
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2004 | 08:28 AM
  #13  
Jasonoff's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 16,673
Likes: 1
From: Waterloo
Default

I thought that was nuts for the RE050.... the S-02's are in the 200 zone right?? 220 or something.
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2004 | 08:55 AM
  #14  
PLYRS 3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 23,749
Likes: 3
From: Erock's my boat!
Default

um i don't think so...even the S-02's (for the S2000) are 140.


Reply
Old Sep 28, 2004 | 09:03 AM
  #15  
matrix's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 22,863
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Default

^ correct S02s were 120.

RA1s are 40....but I don't believe that, I think they are higher...
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2004 | 09:18 AM
  #16  
Jasonoff's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 16,673
Likes: 1
From: Waterloo
Default

220....120....... what's one digit between friends
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2004 | 10:10 AM
  #17  
PLYRS 3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 23,749
Likes: 3
From: Erock's my boat!
Default

Originally Posted by matrix,Sep 28 2004, 01:03 PM
^ correct S02s were 120.

RA1s are 40....but I don't believe that, I think they are higher...
marco,

they're 140....per B/F website.

40 for the RA1's seems right. you think they should be higher - or lower??


Reply
Old Sep 28, 2004 | 10:20 AM
  #18  
Fob's Avatar
Fob
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,865
Likes: 0
From: Markham
Default

I really want this one...



...but it's not DOT approved...
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2004 | 10:26 AM
  #19  
matrix's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 22,863
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Default

Originally Posted by PLYRS 3,Sep 28 2004, 01:10 PM
marco,

they're 140....per B/F website.

40 for the RA1's seems right. you think they should be higher - or lower??
my bad...it was a typo, I meant 140 as I agreed with you....

regarding the RA1s - higher because I have used these tires all year and barely noticed a change. And Doug's full tread took a long time to wear down also...
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2004 | 10:35 AM
  #20  
PLYRS 3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 23,749
Likes: 3
From: Erock's my boat!
Default

are you talking change in perf. or physical tread wear?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:58 AM.