Texas - North Texas S2000 Owners North Texas S2000 Owners Club
North Texas Club

Other Car Forums

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 29, 2005 | 03:47 PM
  #11  
outlaw442's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
From: DFW
Default

Originally Posted by Kaiser,Jul 29 2005, 01:09 PM
Slightly off topic.... but I wish I'd had a camera with me today... I saw SPINNERS on an 18 wheeler.
not off topic.. that was a post in the OTR forums...
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2005 | 10:33 AM
  #12  
Tx_Phantom's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,359
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Worth, TX
Default

You might be addicted to racing if:

You think the primary purpose of wings is to PREVENT flight.

You take your helmet along when you go to a car dealership for a test-drive.

When something falls off of your car, you wonder how much weight you just saved.

You sit in your race car in a dark garage and make car noises and shift and practice your heel and toe, while waiting for your motor to get back from the machine shop.

Your wife doesn't understand why you need three sets of tires for your car.

You think the last line of the Star Spangled Banner is: "Gentlemen, start your engines!"

You're registered for wedding gifts with Edelbrock and Griggs.

A neighbor asks if you have any oil, to which you query, "Synthetic or organic?" and they reply, "Corn."

You refer to the corner down the street from your house as "Turn One."

You always late apex the intersection and try to pass a few cars coming out.

You save broken car parts as " mementos".

You've tried synthetic oil and racing gas in your lawn mower.

Instead of pictures in your wallet, you have timeslips.

You would choose a rollbar over air conditioning if it were an option.

You enjoy driving through wet, empty parking lots using the Emergency Brake to turn.

When someone asks where you went to school, you reply, "Skip Barber".

You have racing shops programmed on your speed dialer.

You own five cars and only one of them is street legal.

You've slalomed in a construction zone, and counted your penalty time in the rearview mirror afterwards.

After you tell your wife where you'd like to go on your vacation she answers: "Why, is there a race there?"
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2005 | 04:30 PM
  #13  
mxt_77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,482
Likes: 3
From: Wylie, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Tx_Phantom,Aug 2 2005, 01:33 PM
You might be addicted to racing if:
Do you have to answer "Yes" to all of those? Since I'm not married, the last one doesn't apply to me! Thank goodness I'm not an addict!
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2005 | 06:42 AM
  #14  
Tx_Phantom's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,359
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Worth, TX
Default

Even more...

What your care says about you:

================================


Acura NSX - I
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2005 | 09:18 AM
  #15  
marcucci's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,898
Likes: 1
From: Fort Worth
Default

Other than the Ford 2.3 forum, because the 2.3 is one of the most reliable engines of it's time... remember that block is the same one used in the pinto's until 1996 in the Ford Ranger....
Have you had one of these before? Longetivity != reliability. This is one of the shittiest motors in modern time, if you asked me. It might be a relatively solid bottom end, but the top end and electronics (on newer ones) make it a pretty unreliable plant. Unreliable by modern standards, at least. Everyone I have known with one of these has had some sort of electrical problem prior to 100k miles and generally can't get the thing to run 6 days a week after that.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2005 | 09:30 AM
  #16  
Doug0716's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,257
Likes: 0
From: Plano, TX
Default

Originally Posted by marcucci,Aug 3 2005, 12:18 PM
Have you had one of these before? Longetivity != reliability. This is one of the shittiest motors in modern time, if you asked me. It might be a relatively solid bottom end, but the top end and electronics (on newer ones) make it a pretty unreliable plant. Unreliable by modern standards, at least. Everyone I have known with one of these has had some sort of electrical problem prior to 100k miles and generally can't get the thing to run 6 days a week after that.
Yes, actually my 94 Ford ranger had almost 150K miles on it, running strong... started up every time... Only things that had been replaced on it was the alternator (@75K) and the clutch (@100K) since we had gotten it at about 60K miles... I also had other friends that had the same engine in their ford ranger and mustangs with the same reliability. And I beat on that thing just as hard as I do, if not harder, on my S2K...

The turbo version on the other hand is a little different story... I was going to rebuild one of these and put it in my Ranger (before a dirt hauler truck cut me off doing 30MPH less than the speed limit and pretty much totaled it out)... those, in stock for, with general extra care given for the turbo were also pretty reliable. There are stock 2.3T motors with over 200K running pretty good... however when modified they would quickly become very finikey(sp?).

-Doug
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2005 | 11:05 AM
  #17  
Tx_Phantom's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,359
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Worth, TX
Default


Excuse me while I go to the bathroom to Yak...

LeBarron
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 08:21 PM
  #18  
98_1LE's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
From: DFW
Default

Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
toosteeley
Southern Ontario S2000 Owners
48
Dec 3, 2005 12:01 PM
rm7boy
Car and Bike Talk
6
Oct 27, 2005 07:11 PM
Ludedude
Nevada S2000 Owners
6
Oct 21, 2004 04:06 PM
nibble
New York - Metro New York S2000 Owners
4
Oct 16, 2004 06:09 PM
Palmateer
S2000 Vintage Owners
17
Sep 26, 2004 05:26 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:27 PM.