Yellow Light Timing
Originally Posted by turbolane,Feb 3 2006, 01:37 PM
I don't agree that yellow light timing makes no difference; but only because they are not ALL on the same timing. Sure we can adapt to a consistent time, but that's not how yellow lights work. I would seem to me that the study which found longer yellows were safer and reduced violations (basically the same I'd think) would be correct, and slower ones were more dangerous. They are outside the mean time, so would get "misjudged".
While both of those links are interested, especially the one that quotes the figures for the Texas Transportaton Institute I still couldn't find any links to tell me what the state standards are for yellow lights.
It said there was a full study that was available in a PDF format but I didn't see a way to get it.
EDIT
DOH! the bottom line is the link to the pdf. It just didn't look like a link.)
I am just a few blocks from my state rep and have a friend who is a state rep, I want to give it to them
What is the ITE it mentions?
i like the fact that the other link says that most of the red light tickets were issued for less than 1/2 second "technical" violations but most of the crashes happened due to 5 second "practical" violations.
It said there was a full study that was available in a PDF format but I didn't see a way to get it.
EDIT
DOH! the bottom line is the link to the pdf. It just didn't look like a link.)I am just a few blocks from my state rep and have a friend who is a state rep, I want to give it to them
What is the ITE it mentions?
i like the fact that the other link says that most of the red light tickets were issued for less than 1/2 second "technical" violations but most of the crashes happened due to 5 second "practical" violations.
Originally Posted by Texas25RS,Feb 3 2006, 12:54 PM
I would have to dig out some of my social psychology course work, but there have been studies about the timing of yellow lights. Those studies have shown that no matter how long or short the duration of a yellow is, you get about the same number of people running red lights. Anticipation and adaptation are just what we humans are good at...
To my understanding, the camera only takes a pic when the light actually turns red... so just be more attentive to the car in front of you and you should be fine when it comes to getting in a wreck
To my understanding, the camera only takes a pic when the light actually turns red... so just be more attentive to the car in front of you and you should be fine when it comes to getting in a wreck
http://www.thenewspaper.com/rlc/docs...ternatives.pdf
Originally Posted by Wildncrazy,Feb 3 2006, 02:08 PM
While both of those links are interested, especially the one that quotes the figures for the Texas Transportaton Institute I still couldn't find any links to tell me what the state standards are for yellow lights.
It said there was a full study that was available in a PDF format but I didn't see a way to get it.
It said there was a full study that was available in a PDF format but I didn't see a way to get it.
The PDF link is in the article.. http://www.thenewspaper.com/rlc/docs...ternatives.pdf
Originally Posted by candyass,Feb 3 2006, 01:01 PM
Am I the only person here who actively tries not to run red lights and could care less about the cameras.
Although I'm kinda fond of the cameras. I just wish they were criminal violations including photos of the drivers. Waaay too many close calls with yahoos blowing through lights at double the posted limit. I just wish the one near my house was 1 block further south at Independence and Plano Parkway... I see the same gray-hair drive through that light 2 afternoons a week. Apparently she took drivers' ed before traffic lights were invented.
wow... a study done after I graduated....
love how times change
I stand corrected... and at that... by Aggies... 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...5100301844.html
http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/08/862.asp
http://www.designnine.com/news/?q=node/542
And the articles go on forever about how the number of accidents increase as redlight running decreases at camera controlled intersections...
love how times change
I stand corrected... and at that... by Aggies... 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...5100301844.html
http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/08/862.asp
http://www.designnine.com/news/?q=node/542
And the articles go on forever about how the number of accidents increase as redlight running decreases at camera controlled intersections...
And no body actively tries to run red lights... people actively try to run yellow lights which end up with them running reds. Too many people forget that yellow means to stop if you can.... not to hurry up.
Originally Posted by Texas25RS,Feb 3 2006, 02:54 PM
And the articles go on forever about how the number of accidents increase as redlight running decreases at camera controlled intersections...
http://www.hwysafety.com/hwy_redlight_orwell.htm
During the 79th Texas Legislature in 2005, camera-critic state Rep. Gary Elkins harped on this point:
"In almost every city where red light cameras have been allowed there has been a manipulation of traffic signals to increase tickets by reducing the duration of yellow lights," Elkins cautioned. "It really comes down to money."
Texas law doesn't prevent cities from adjusting yellow light times however they choose to maximize revenue. In fact, reducing yellow light times may contribute to an unlikely result noted by numerous researchers over the last year: red light cameras turn out to increase, not decrease accidents overall. All the "traffic safety" malarkey you hear from camera proponents really is just a smokescreen; the stats on the ground don't justify the rhetoric. "Cameras can't make judgment calls," Rep. Elkins pointed out.
Originally Posted by Wildncrazy,Feb 3 2006, 04:04 PM
Just got notification in the mail from the city of Richardson that said not to worry you would only get a $75 civil fine and it wouldn't go on your driving record.



