UK & Ireland S2000 Community Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it in the UK and Ireland. Including FAQs, and technical questions.

Lightweight Wheels

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 14, 2005 | 02:26 PM
  #21  
Ruckus's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 0
From: Kent'ish
Default

"elegant" HAHA HAHA HAHA

ITS A CAR NOT A PORCELAIN DOLL !

BTW it most likely DOES make it go faster,

Brighter Color = More attention
More attention = Happier sponsors
Happier sponsors = More money
More Money = More development
More development = FASTER

[EDIT] Sorry to hi-jack the thread, but some of the P&S brigade take any opportunity to knock individualism...
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2005 | 02:26 PM
  #22  
smnasn's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,613
Likes: 0
From: UK
Default

Been thinking of lighter wheels myself...

Can someone tell me what the OEM weigh (vs say the wheels above)?

TVM
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2005 | 01:36 AM
  #23  
Lou S2K's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 0
From: Northampton
Default

Stock.
17.5 lbs front
18.6 lb.s rear

17.7 and 20.5lbs. for MY04+
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2005 | 01:48 AM
  #24  
Nick Graves's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,181
Likes: 58
From: Hertford
Default

For some reason, alloys seem to be quoted in lbs. Bit like Guineas, I suppose.

Those '04 rears ARE heavy!

Trouble is, like all things S2000, it's not easy to find a better alternative.

The Mugen MF10s are the only alloy I know which has the correct offset, are light weight and elegant. They were extortionately expensive outside of Japan and are apparently out of pruduction.

One would have thought another wheel manufacturer would see a market and mill down their bosses accordingly.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2005 | 02:11 AM
  #25  
Lou S2K's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 0
From: Northampton
Default

Nick,

The wheels i have, a couple of the volks and a few others are the correct offsets, and are made specially for the S2000.

The 04 wheels are a lower offset than the my00 wheels aswell.

But i agree the Mugens are the best compromise.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2005 | 02:16 AM
  #26  
C7BLE's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 10,672
Likes: 0
From: The Middle of Nowhere
Default

Originally Posted by Ruckus' date='Feb 14 2005, 11:26 PM
[EDIT] Sorry to hi-jack the thread, but some of the P&S brigade take any opportunity to knock individualism...
I'm not knocking indivdualism, I just don't like the look of that car.

I do however like the look of those wheels in Lou's car.

Whats your problem? Who died and put you in charge of style?

It's not down to you to tell me what I should and shouldn't like, the car is what it is. The bright coloured riced up look is for some and not for others.

If that makes me one of the "pipe and slippers" brigade then fair enough. If you are getting pissed off because I have an opinion then I suggest you get a new hobby because this one is going to give you an aneurysm.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2005 | 02:41 AM
  #27  
Ruckus's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 0
From: Kent'ish
Default

As I said in the first post my bitch at users that constantly knock 'mods', was really not aim at you but your post was the catalyst for my little rant.

What was aimed at yourself was your seeming misunderstanding at the 'point' of the J's RACE car.
If it was a Road car i would tend to agree that it was over the top and 'riced' but a race car is built to go fast and get attention.
You still may not like the look of it which is fine, but if you were the race team that ran it and that design/look got you 2 second off a lap and another 50k a year in sponsership, I suspect you would love it.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2005 | 02:59 AM
  #28  
eSeM's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 39,548
Likes: 11
From: City Of London / Knebworth
Default

Originally Posted by Nick Graves' date='Feb 15 2005, 10:48 AM
The Mugen MF10s are the only alloy I know which has the correct offset, are light weight and elegant.
You mean these ones ......



Reply
Old Feb 15, 2005 | 03:37 AM
  #29  
Fletch's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 17,572
Likes: 1
From: Wakefield, West Yorks.
Default

Originally Posted by Ruckus' date='Feb 15 2005, 11:41 AM
You still may not like the look of it which is fine, but if you were the race team that ran it and that design/look got you 2 second off a lap and another 50k a year in sponsership, I suspect you would love it.
I would have added...

"Or at least put up with it."


I actually quite like it.
But then I'm a Needforspeed Underground loving Chav.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2005 | 05:53 AM
  #30  
C7BLE's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 10,672
Likes: 0
From: The Middle of Nowhere
Default

Originally Posted by Ruckus' date='Feb 15 2005, 11:41 AM
As I said in the first post my bitch at users that constantly knock 'mods', was really not aim at you but your post was the catalyst for my little rant.

What was aimed at yourself was your seeming misunderstanding at the 'point' of the J's RACE car.
If it was a Road car i would tend to agree that it was over the top and 'riced' but a race car is built to go fast and get attention.
You still may not like the look of it which is fine, but if you were the race team that ran it and that design/look got you 2 second off a lap and another 50k a year in sponsership, I suspect you would love it.
I understand the point of the car just fine, it doesn't have any bearing on my opinion of it.

Just like I understand the point of Lycra, doesn't mean I like spandex

But as you say, each to there own.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:12 AM.