Upper Mid-West S2000 Owners Members from the upper mid-west including Michigan, Illinios, Indiana, and Wisconsin

profunction on the 24th at 2pm

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 06:50 PM
  #11  
myslow1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Default

yesh
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 09:38 PM
  #12  
Zgradis's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,606
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Default

What was the numbers before the tune?
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2010 | 01:11 PM
  #13  
myslow1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Default

sorry i dont own a scanner. Dont mind the date on the pic i dont know how to change it on the camera lol. If you want it larger let me know.

considering my mods i would say these are good numbers.

Reply
Old Mar 25, 2010 | 01:28 PM
  #14  
myslow1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Default

here is a short video. Sorry for cutting it off i accidentally hit the stop button lol[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IBCLYQwR0KU [/media]
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2010 | 06:59 PM
  #15  
philbert's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 1
From: Coastal CT
Default

nice improvement, especially in the midrange. that's the real value of a dyno, measuring immediate changes to the tune. but it's hard to draw too many conclusions from the absolute numbers, especially that dyno, which is not corrected for weather/atmosphere.

i went to profunction twice, once with the intent of establishing a baseline, and then again with a small group after installing an exhaust a few weeks later. it was much colder the first visit, and my car looked like it had a freak engine. the next visit, my readings came back down to earth a bit, and was in line with another 06+ run immediately after me.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2010 | 07:35 PM
  #16  
myslow1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Default

^yeah. The car feels a lot stronger though Now i just need to decide on my next mod. The ricer in me wants a cf hood haha!
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2010 | 07:50 PM
  #17  
Zgradis's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 2,606
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Default

Originally Posted by myslow1,Mar 25 2010, 10:35 PM
^yeah. The car feels a lot stronger though Now i just need to decide on my next mod. The ricer in me wants a cf hood haha!
I can't imagine you save THAT much weight with a CF hood, my vote is for something that will give you more hp
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2010 | 08:15 PM
  #18  
jdnissanz's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,815
Likes: 0
Default

Nice Mikey probably didn't want to tune it too aggressive. The curve definitely looks verry nice!

JD
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 03:04 AM
  #19  
K1ngfunK's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 22,387
Likes: 3
From: The land of corruption, cachaça, and caipirinhas.
Default

Originally Posted by Zgradis,Mar 25 2010, 09:50 PM
I can't imagine you save THAT much weight with a CF hood, my vote is for something that will give you more hp
*SOME* CF hoods actually weigh MORE than stock, but do what ya wanna do man. Nice lookin' curve.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2010 | 08:42 AM
  #20  
myslow1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Default

well my next performance mods are clutch flywheel and a s/c but im thinkin a cf hood along the way would be nice
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:17 PM.