Wheels and Tires Discussion about wheels and tires for the S2000.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Buying tires soon. Need recomendations.

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 26, 2012 | 07:37 PM
  #1  
Danwolski's Avatar
Thread Starter
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 13
From: Near Chicago
Default Buying tires soon. Need recomendations.

So im buying tires soon for my ap2 sized rims. I want summer tires for sure but im undecided on the type. I autocross about every 2 weeks so I want something thats grippy, they should be decent in rain since its my daily driver too. I would also prefer that they last a decent amount of time and dont cost too much. But I realize that there probably isnt a tire that combines all of that. I was thinking of getting star specs but some people have told me they arent really necesary, so im not sure. I was also looking at RS3's but they are always out of stock. I wouldent want to spend over 700$ for the set too.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2012 | 08:06 PM
  #2  
ZDan's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,863
Likes: 125
From: Pawtucket, RI
Default

Best two options I'm seeing:
Sumitomo HTRZIII (less $$$, more void area for greater hydroplaning resistance)
Star Spec (more $$$, more dry grip, fantastic wet grip as well, but will hydroplane sooner in standing water, particularly when worn)
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2012 | 08:12 PM
  #3  
Danwolski's Avatar
Thread Starter
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 13
From: Near Chicago
Default

Im looking at the Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110, any feedback on them? Tirerack is having a sale and they are super cheap. When I put them in my cart in tirerack it says 245/40ZR17 XL, any idea what the XL means? Its also strange that when I search for s2000 tires they dont show up but they come in s2000 sizes.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2012 | 02:27 AM
  #4  
ZDan's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,863
Likes: 125
From: Pawtucket, RI
Default

Tha Hankook's would be fine, too, but the HTRZIII compared well against it in testing: http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tests/...y.jsp?ttid=149

XL means that tire is rated for higher loads. Not necessary for S2k, can be heavier, also a bit stiffer vs non-XL tires of same make/model.

For AP2 wheels, check these sizes:
215/45-17, 245/40-17
215/45-17, 255/40-17
224/45-17, 255/40-17

Look at any test reports for tires considered. Also look at customer survey reviews to see how people who have used them rate them.

Tire Rack = fantastic resource for determining what the best tire is for your wants/needs/usage.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2012 | 04:17 AM
  #5  
takeshi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,359
Likes: 3
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Danwolski
I want summer tires for sure but im undecided on the type. I autocross about every 2 weeks so I want something thats grippy, they should be decent in rain since its my daily driver too. I would also prefer that they last a decent amount of time and dont cost too much. But I realize that there probably isnt a tire that combines all of that.
You'll definitely have to compromise somewhere. What's most important and least important to you?

Originally Posted by Danwolski
Im looking at the Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110, any feedback on them?
Don't overlook existing threads:
https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C...=1024&bih=1195
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2012 | 04:39 AM
  #6  
Danwolski's Avatar
Thread Starter
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 13
From: Near Chicago
Default

I guess hydroplaining resistance and how long it lasts isnt as important. Id rather have a grippy tire that doesent last as long, but id want it to last at least 10k miles. Also wouldent want it to be over 700$ a set and thats like a maximum.

Also road comfort and noise comfort is not really a issue, im looking more at the handling.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2012 | 05:26 AM
  #7  
ZDan's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,863
Likes: 125
From: Pawtucket, RI
Default

Originally Posted by Danwolski
I guess hydroplaining resistance and how long it lasts isnt as important. Id rather have a grippy tire that doesent last as long, but id want it to last at least 10k miles. Also wouldent want it to be over 700$ a set and thats like a maximum.

Also road comfort and noise comfort is not really a issue, im looking more at the handling.
Star Specs, then.

If you want 10k+ miles, don't run excessive rear toe-in (imo, anything over about 0.4 degrees total). I get ~20k or so miles out of sticky tires like StarSpecs or RS-3s in back, running -2 camber and 0.2degrees total rear toe-in.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2012 | 06:19 AM
  #8  
suprmonky73's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,252
Likes: 3
From: charlotte, nc
Default

had HTRZIII on my car before i had the hankook evo 12 and i liked the HTRZIII's more. The hankooks took FOREVER to break in through the mold release compound (1000+ miles)

when they weren't worn they were hard to spin in 1st in the rain. Also, if you are on a straight empty road and you swerve left and right quickly (like a slalom), it feels like they are stiffer/more responsive for quick transitions side to side.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2012 | 06:27 AM
  #9  
Reckon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,792
Likes: 1
From: New Market, AL
Default

I love my HTRZ3s. Have had no issues, handles very well dry and well wet. Have about 4k miles or so on them and are wearing fine. For the money, you really can't beat them and they stack up just above mid pack in the category.

Best overall, daily driving - Max Performance Summer
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/survey...ay.jsp?type=MP

Best handling - Extreme Performance Summer
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/survey...ay.jsp?type=EP
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2012 | 06:28 AM
  #10  
Danwolski's Avatar
Thread Starter
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 13
From: Near Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by ZDan
Originally Posted by Danwolski' timestamp='1340800758' post='21815060
I guess hydroplaining resistance and how long it lasts isnt as important. Id rather have a grippy tire that doesent last as long, but id want it to last at least 10k miles. Also wouldent want it to be over 700$ a set and thats like a maximum.

Also road comfort and noise comfort is not really a issue, im looking more at the handling.
Star Specs, then.

If you want 10k+ miles, don't run excessive rear toe-in (imo, anything over about 0.4 degrees total). I get ~20k or so miles out of sticky tires like StarSpecs or RS-3s in back, running -2 camber and 0.2degrees total rear toe-in.
I might get an alignment done after buying them then, I bought the car used with its current alignment and im not sure what it is. Did you have both RS-3s amd star specs? If so then do you think its worth spending the extra money on the star specs?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:03 PM.