Wheels and Tires Discussion about wheels and tires for the S2000.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

CONCAVE te37 love

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 10, 2012 | 03:04 PM
  #1  
sro_alvaro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
From: so cal
Default CONCAVE te37 love

http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show....php?t=2251778


i know we can't fit that wide of wheels, especially with low offsets, and don't get me wrong, I'm al about function, and i could care less about being "low"

i gotta pick these up asap, ill MAKE them fit...i have to! 245-255 all around as well... O LES DO IT!
any inputs?
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2012 | 03:14 PM
  #2  
S2k007's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,081
Likes: 2
From: Temecula, CA
Default

+12? Wont' fit unless you get over fenders or wider fenders. It'll just look ridiculous.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2012 | 03:40 PM
  #3  
Manga_Spawn's Avatar
Site Moderator
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 13,625
Likes: 372
From: Seattle WA
Default

Those aren't even that concave. Don't they concave at a higher offset than that like +35 or +30? +12 is just so agressive even with overfenders and wider fronts you won't cover them. I am pretty sure there are concave ones with a higher offset.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2012 | 03:53 PM
  #4  
Jin_SK's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 750
Likes: 4
Default

http://www.evasivemotorsports.com/mm...ode=S2000-AERO

That, or something very similar to that MIGHT buy you enough clearance.

But orange TEs?.....

Looked at the numbers again, even with +50mm clearance on the front it isn't enough. Just get some TE37SL in +35 or whatever and roll like a bauss.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2012 | 04:14 PM
  #5  
sro_alvaro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
From: so cal
Default

lol well i keep hearing different things
i hear that there not concave until about +15
but if at +35 there concave, I'm super down for that

anyone know where te37 start becoming concave?
+22 maybe?
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2012 | 04:41 PM
  #6  
rsxiness03's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 582
Likes: 0
From: TORONTO
Default

+22 they are concave and +35 with the teSL
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2012 | 06:05 PM
  #7  
sillyboybmxer's Avatar
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 9,744
Likes: 31
From: Nevada
Default

17x9 +22 is the first concave for 17s
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2012 | 05:56 AM
  #8  
deepbluejh's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,724
Likes: 5
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

- You know you can't run offsets this low
- You're all about function
- You must pick up these wheels ASAP (<--- Huh??)

One of those statements doesn't fit.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2012 | 09:09 AM
  #9  
sro_alvaro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
From: so cal
Default

Originally Posted by deepbluejh
- You know you can't run offsets this low
- You're all about function
- You must pick up these wheels ASAP (<--- Huh??)

One of those statements doesn't fit.
im trying to push the limits lol
not necessarily those specs, but im trying to pick up TE37 in general asap
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2012 | 09:15 AM
  #10  
Rubn1out4GudLuk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,268
Likes: 3
From: San Diego
Default

I don't know about SL's but I've personally seen that 17x9 +22 and 17x9.5 +28 are both concave. You can fit 17x9 +22 with ASM over fenders.

Here's a LBP that has 17x9 +40 in the front and 17x9 +22 in the rear(not my car).



Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:33 AM.