Wheels and Tires Discussion about wheels and tires for the S2000.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

RE050 vs S-03?

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 19, 2005 | 02:36 PM
  #1  
RUGBY's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,118
Likes: 2
From: Bergen County, NJ
Default RE050 vs S-03?

I need to replace my original S-02 (rears) after 17K/miles. I am going with new tires all-around.

Based on my driving style and the wear/performance/cost trade-offs, I'm thinking either RE050 or S-03. The car is a weekend driver. I would classify myself as a 'cruiser' - - - no real 'spirited' driving, wouldn't know how to spin the rears.

I read thru some earlier posts but, with the search being down, I'm having trouble getting a great feel for the pros / cons of these two choices. My guess is either is more than adequate for my needs.

Your input would be appreciated...and again sorry but the search is down.

Michael
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2005 | 03:11 PM
  #2  
TR-S2K's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,774
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, SoCal
Default

Fuzion ZRi may be better for your driving needs. It would last longer than either RE050 or S-03 and costs less too. It performs well on the wet which is what you need in Wash.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2005 | 01:04 PM
  #3  
hpark's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,941
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto
Default

either RE050 or S-03 would work....both have great dry grip and good traction in the wet.....only negative is both are pricey.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2005 | 04:26 PM
  #4  
K.Leland's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Default

and the S-03's burn out amazingly fast
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2005 | 04:34 PM
  #5  
watermelonman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
From: wishing I was in -
Default

Does anyone have the official word on why the tires changed (AP1 to AP2) in the first place?
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2005 | 07:24 AM
  #6  
brent_strong's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,282
Likes: 0
From: Franklin TN
Default

Another option, though I'm not sure if they are offered in the sizes you need, would be the Michelin Pilot Sport 2's.

My friend ran S-03 on his 350z and yeah, they did wear quickly. Changing to the PS2's, he found longer life, better traction in both wet and dry and even less noise. The tires have really really impressed me so far.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2005 | 10:53 AM
  #7  
spa-zz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 13
From: Howard County, MD
Default

Originally Posted by RUGBY,Jul 19 2005, 02:36 PM
I would classify myself as a 'cruiser' - - - no real 'spirited' driving, wouldn't know how to spin the rears.
If you say you don't really do spirited driving, maybe you should consider a longer-wearing, all season tire!
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Jul 22, 2005 | 01:03 PM
  #8  
aronparsons's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 824
Likes: 0
From: Potomac Falls, VA
Default

If you can afford it, get the S03s. I personally couldn't justify $200/tire on a daily driver. I got the RE750s and am quite happy. They don't have the same level of ultimate grip, but they handle the rain quite nicely here in WA and fit the budget. I'm getting Hoosiers for where ultimate grip matters, autocross. I would have liked the Michelin Pilot Sport 2s or the Kuhmo MXs, but neither have the correct 245/45/16 for the rear. I would never put something like Fuzions or Kuhmo 712s on this car; I feel those are tailored more towards Civics and the like. If only the S02s were practical in terms of price and wet traction, I don't think anyone would take them off
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
thatguybryan
Wheels and Tires
38
Nov 15, 2010 08:57 AM
300zx
Wheels and Tires
9
Feb 18, 2004 07:55 PM
FunkyR
Wheels and Tires
2
Nov 20, 2003 12:02 AM
petraidm
Wheels and Tires
2
Sep 29, 2003 01:35 PM
SanchothePanda
Wheels and Tires
4
Mar 23, 2003 04:47 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:46 AM.