Wheels and Tires Discussion about wheels and tires for the S2000.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

S-03's Slippery and Noisey

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 19, 2002 | 05:12 PM
  #11  
UCrazyKid's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
From: Campbell
Default

Well after 1,000miles and a month of driving, I turned in my S-03's for a set of S-02's. The smile is back on my face already. They just have more grip, period. Gonna be bummed when they stop making the S-02's and I have to find another tire to replace them.

AA
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2002 | 06:09 PM
  #12  
AndyP's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 8,508
Likes: 0
From: Burtonsville, MD
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by UCrazyKid
[B]Well after 1,000miles and a month of driving, I turned in my S-03's for a set of S-02's.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2002 | 10:51 AM
  #13  
WestSideBilly's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 93,305
Likes: 820
From: Nowhere
Default

Don't write off S-03PPs entirely. They do not have the dry grip of the OEM S-02s, but they're not nearly as bad as UCrazyKid seems to think they are.

1. The first 250-500 miles on them are a total loss. The top layer is oily and the tires like to slide. After that the grip is probably 98% of what an OEM S-02 can offer.
2. UCrazyKid's mismatched S-02/S-03PP situation aggravated the S2000's oversteer tendancy.
3. As for the squeeling, I'm not entirely sure. The tire mismatch certainly wouldn't help, possibly improper inflation, or possibly unrealistic expections. Every tire squeels at the limit, the limits just vary. Or maybe you are just a maniac (You are aware that you don't have to take every turn at the limit, right?).
4. For those of us not blessed with 360 days of sunshine per year, the S-03PP offers something the S-02 will never achieve - good wet grip. While the S-03PP is in the range of 98% of the S-02's dry grip, I'd rate it at about 200% of the S-02s wet grip. Something to consider!
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2002 | 11:02 AM
  #14  
Phantom's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,804
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Default

I don't know why you guys are complaining about the S03's.

You guys should know that the stock S02's are the stickiest dry weather street tire application for the s2000. This trait is due to:

1. Oversized tread width
2. Reduced water channels (good for dry, bad for wet)
3. Sticky compound (good for grip, bad for longevity)

I wore out my first set of S02's in 4,500 miles! You can't compare a all season performance tire like the S03 to the hyper S02 s2000 spec.!
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2002 | 11:11 AM
  #15  
AndyP's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 8,508
Likes: 0
From: Burtonsville, MD
Default

Originally posted by Phantom
I don't know why you guys are complaining about the S03's.
Because, like you said, "You guys should know that the stock S02's are the stickiest dry weather street tire application for the s2000."

I had no other choice when I got my 17's, since the S02's were not made in any other size than OEM and the S03's were supposed to be the next best thing...as far as Tire Rack was concerned. I really wanted the S02's or a similar handling tire in 17". And that's my gripe about the S03's.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2002 | 11:59 AM
  #16  
Tedster's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,144
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
Default

R compound (Toyo RA-1, Michelin Pilot Sport Cup, or Yokohama A032R) for the summer, Bridgestone SO-3 for the winter. That's my plan now that I'm on 17" wheels. I've got 7000+ miles and 6 track days so far on the RA-1s, and I love 'em.

Ted
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2002 | 12:12 PM
  #17  
UCrazyKid's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 783
Likes: 0
From: Campbell
Default

After 1,000 miles on the S-03's they did not even compare to the grip I get with the new S-02's after 100 miles, Period. The S-03's are NOT 98% of the S-03's in the dry, maybe 88-90%. Wet might be another story, but I never had a single issue with the S-02's in the wet either. I knew I had 30 days to try them out, so I drove them hard. Realistically I only get in a long spirited drive once a month, but I wanted to have that grip when I do it. Perhaps the S-03's perform better in 17" applications, I wouldn't know as I am running the stock wheels. My comparison is between the stockers and S-03's in 245/45/16. So the tread with should be the same. I was disappointed as Bridgestone markets the S-03's as "all that the S-02's are PLUS, better ride, wet weather grip and longer wear" through better material. This, they are not.

Your mileage may very...

As for returning the tires, I didn't even have to go through Bridgestone, the tire shop "Wheel Works" has a 30 day satisfaction guarantee with there tires. They handled it all.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2002 | 12:12 PM
  #18  
PLYRS 3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 23,749
Likes: 3
From: Erock's my boat!
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by WestSideBilly
[B]1.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2002 | 12:44 PM
  #19  
jschmidt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
From: Laurel
Default

Still very happy with my AVS Sports. Wouldn't trade them for S-02s (or S-03s) any day. That said, one of the faster drivers in our region does it on S-03s.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2002 | 01:18 PM
  #20  
S TWO K's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,846
Likes: 0
From: AOL usa.
Default

I was happy with the AVS Sports too. I just recieved new SO3s, and I'm still breaking them in.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:06 PM.