Wheels and Tires Discussion about wheels and tires for the S2000.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Unclear on fit for TC105x

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 1, 2018 | 12:51 PM
  #1  
Mike127's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Default Unclear on fit for TC105x

Hi all,

I've been trying to do research on fitment (new to the s2k world) and I've pre-ordered the new Weds as per the specs below. From my understanding these should clear a BBK and only require minor fender rolling? Correct me if I'm wrong! The car is lowered but i'm not sure on what springs (they're red if that helps lol). I'm a little worried that I'd need to change the rears unless running stupid camber.

17x8+42 wrapped with 225/45
17x9+35 wrapped with 255/40

Thanks
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2018 | 12:56 PM
  #2  
TsukubaCody's Avatar
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 2,866
Likes: 465
Default

I'd go higher offset in the rear if you want to do a minimal roll, just to be safe.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2018 | 04:21 PM
  #3  
1nate7's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,273
Likes: 29
From: Tucson
Default

IMO 9.5" +45 rear would have been a much better choice.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2018 | 05:51 AM
  #4  
Mike127's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 1nate7
IMO 9.5" +45 rear would have been a much better choice.
The 9.5 +45 is only 3mm less outward poke and weigh 0.5 lbs more.
The 9.0+49 is 14mm less and weighs 0.5 lbs more.

I'm thinking of maybe switching from 255 to 245 in the rear would save that same ~3mm and also give an additional 1.3 lbs of weight savings (1.8 vs the wheel change).
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2018 | 08:47 AM
  #5  
chrisaltima's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,263
Likes: 71
Default

I am going 9.5+45 (255) square. They will fit no problem with a roll in the rear. My front is pulled so it's fine there. I am coming from a 9.5+38 (255) that worked with minor rubbing.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2018 | 09:03 AM
  #6  
Manga_Spawn's Avatar
Site Moderator
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 13,625
Likes: 372
From: Seattle WA
Default

Yeah those need all the fenders rolled flat and the tabs relocated.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2018 | 09:32 AM
  #7  
Mike127's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Manga_Spawn
Yeah those need all the fenders rolled flat and the tabs relocated.

Thanks for the comment. Seems like you're the expert in this section.

It's currently on 7.5x17+40 all around (yeah stupid...) so the front Weds will poke +5mm more then current (+26 more then stock). I don't see an issue with rubbing based on how my current fitment looks for the front.
My rear is currently +12 from stock, the Weds on order are +36 from stock (or ~24mm more poke then current).

My fenders might already be rolled from looking at pics on here of stock ones (got the car two weeks ago). I'll try to get some pics up tonight to see if fenders are rolled and tab relocated already.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2018 | 07:15 PM
  #8  
afzan's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,601
Likes: 103
From: Toronto
Default

+35 rears need a pull in the rear IMO, assuming you're keeping camber 'reasonable' (ie: ~ 3*)
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2018 | 08:49 AM
  #9  
Chuck S's Avatar
Member (Premium)
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 13,806
Likes: 1,540
From: Chesterfield VA
Default

Those size tires will fit any of the 17" OEM wheels without any modifications to the car. No need to drop a lot of money on bling wheels.

-- Chuck
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2018 | 09:35 AM
  #10  
chrisaltima's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,263
Likes: 71
Default

+35 is troublesome for the rear. You are much better off with the 9.5+45.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:19 PM.