Wheels and Tires Discussion about wheels and tires for the S2000.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Some advice on ideal new wheel offset set up.

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-09-2017, 09:30 AM
  #31  
Community Organizer

 
s2000Junky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,053
Received 551 Likes on 503 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KW888
thanks buddy for the advice. So spoke to archenemy (they do arch rolling over the uk). Give him the offsets and will get back to me on how they will fit etc. He says the figures seem ok but will check what tyre size etc with suspension height etc. Apparently he's done lots of s2ks and maybe give me a insight on what's to hand. Works Uk have said no rush on deciding the offset as nothing is set in stone ATM. Another Japanese guy says the best set up would be 18x8.5 et40 and 18x9.5 40et? Works says the next size up from the rear is 49et which in DD option gives a 71mm dish. Or option 2 et41 A disc option 71mm dish as well.
9.5 +40 would be better then +37, and would actually be just enough to a 255 without being ridiculous on camber. But if you get the same dish with a +49 id opt for that because it still looks good/aggressive but more functional with ride height and camber alignment leeway. But again if it were me, I wouldn't settle on 8.5/9.5 for custom wheels. A 10.5 in the rear at least with a 285 would be much more savory, and with the right offset, will look the same on the outside as either of the +40 or +49 options. You could basically do the rear option up front with a 9.5 +49 with a 245 for a matched package.
Old 02-09-2017, 09:59 AM
  #32  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
KW888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 48
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by s2000Junky
9.5 +40 would be better then +37, and would actually be just enough to a 255 without being ridiculous on camber. But if you get the same dish with a +49 id opt for that because it still looks good/aggressive but more functional with ride height and camber alignment leeway. But again if it were me, I wouldn't settle on 8.5/9.5 for custom wheels. A 10.5 in the rear at least with a 285 would be much more savory, and with the right offset, will look the same on the outside as either of the +40 or +49 options. You could basically do the rear option up front with a 9.5 +49 with a 245 for a matched package.

yes but unfortunately they don't do a bang on 40et so it's ether 37et or the above 41et on the non deepdish option. I understand most people like the larger tyre but uk there isn't really a thing for larger tyre size also hard to get. Price wise very expensive for the bigger types 285 etc and not many places stock them too.
Old 02-09-2017, 10:19 AM
  #33  
Community Organizer

 
s2000Junky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,053
Received 551 Likes on 503 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KW888
yes but unfortunately they don't do a bang on 40et so it's ether 37et or the above 41et on the non deepdish option. I understand most people like the larger tyre but uk there isn't really a thing for larger tyre size also hard to get. Price wise very expensive for the bigger types 285 etc and not many places stock them too.
No one likes performance over there? 18's are expensive in general. I speak for a some of us when I say that generally due to cost of tires, unless one is looking to exceed a 255 section width, that there is no practical justification to move off of 17" wheels. The benefit/necessity of moving to 18" is you get better fitment options for wider size rubber ie 285-295's.

All my tires are ordered online and pay a shop to install. I don't rely on local shops to carry the kind of performance tires I put on this car. I'm too particular about the most important performing aspect of this car to leave it to the hands of what's locally available collecting dust on a rack somewhere.

Last edited by s2000Junky; 02-09-2017 at 10:21 AM.
Old 02-09-2017, 10:22 AM
  #34  
Moderator

 
RedCelica's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Raleigh
Posts: 15,346
Received 95 Likes on 73 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KW888
If you read the above I have purchased but haven't confirmed the offset as when I DID PURCHASE I had a bit of tweaking to re think to it because the first offset I was planing to order became a problem when deciding on the final factor of the amount of work needed.

as for MY QUESTION was should I purchase more for later or saleable offset or do I make the wheels a more S2K set up. I was also asking for advisable advice on the maximum people would go without using cutting methods or ruining the car just to get a larger diameter wheel on.

Purely opinions of the front offsets I have put out above if it was there choice.
Okay, so since you can play with the offsets a bit whats the HIGHEST offset they're willing to do? If you can go +49 that's your only option unless you're buying fenders.
Old 02-09-2017, 10:55 AM
  #35  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
KW888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 48
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by s2000Junky
No one likes performance over there? 18's are expensive in general. I speak for a some of us when I say that generally due to cost of tires, unless one is looking to exceed a 255 section width, that there is no practical justification to move off of 17" wheels. The benefit/necessity of moving to 18" is you get better fitment options for wider size rubber ie 285-295's.

All my tires are ordered online and pay a shop to install. I don't rely on local shops to carry the kind of performance tires I put on this car. I'm too particular about the most important performing aspect of this car to leave it to the hands of what's locally available collecting dust on a rack somewhere.
yes I would of gone 17 but the s1 (with bolts on the rims). Don't come 17s
Old 02-09-2017, 10:57 AM
  #36  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
KW888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 48
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by RedCelica
Okay, so since you can play with the offsets a bit whats the HIGHEST offset they're willing to do? If you can go +49 that's your only option unless you're buying fenders.
yes they do higher but then your losing the lip which makes these rims what they are. But people have done lower off set without using over fenders
Old 02-09-2017, 11:07 AM
  #37  
Moderator

 
RedCelica's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Raleigh
Posts: 15,346
Received 95 Likes on 73 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KW888
yes they do higher but then your losing the lip which makes these rims what they are. But people have done lower off set without using over fenders
They also run crazy camber and rip out their fender liners. If you're insistent on this then you will need to sacrifice driveability and performance for your "lip" desires.
Old 02-09-2017, 12:32 PM
  #38  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
KW888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 48
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by RedCelica
They also run crazy camber and rip out their fender liners. If you're insistent on this then you will need to sacrifice driveability and performance for your "lip" desires.
waiting on a reply from the arch guy he's got the measurements with tyre and ride height and offset diameters needed hopfully some insight. Although nothing is set in stone accept my money paid over already lol
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
natlbar
Wheels and Tires
2
11-13-2014 05:56 PM
Terrible01
Wheels and Tires
4
11-28-2012 02:49 PM
bruce_s2k
California - Central California & Sacramento
2
03-03-2011 09:37 PM
llxzxll
Wheels and Tires
2
04-09-2010 10:13 AM
zbrewha863
Wheels and Tires
12
03-10-2006 01:42 PM



Quick Reply: Some advice on ideal new wheel offset set up.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:24 AM.