You should see his NSX


Or that other Ford thing he owns...

 

Feezy, I love you man

 

You should see his NSX


Or that other Ford thing he owns...
[/quote]
5-600hp isn't "that" much.

 

I agree. That's why mine makes 750 to 800 and 950 to 1000, respectively

 

lol!

 

#Brofist

 

Hory sheit. I thought you only made 600. Where is the latest build thread?

Edit: yeah last post I saw was here;
https://www.s2ki.com/s2000/topic/107...#entry23058249

which you said 670. 670 is slightly less than 950-1000

 

675rwhp is in the 750 to 800 motor output range assuming 12 to 15 pct drive train losses.

My fgt made 854 rwhp which is 950 to 1000 motor using 12 to 15 pct again.

 

Seriously? Should I say my subaru will make 1100hp because of 900ish wheel? Please don't use crank hp unless you hooked that thing to an engine dyno ala Nelson Racing engines. Use wheel.

That being said, 600-700 wheel is pretty damn fast, but it isn't oh shit we're going plaid.

 

duly noted for future reference.. tho to be fair, without reviewing any of my previous posts, im pretty sure i indicate RWHP when talking rear wheel vs. BHP. And i do go straight by the numbers... i dont massage 20 pct drivetrain losses to eek out 1000 bhp or anything like that, i go by a pretty standard 12-15% which i think most people accept as normal.

though my RS6 has 25% losses, unbeleivable.. and that's pretty common i guess. Quattro i guess. meh.

On side note. 850 rwhp is enough to pull most bikes. hee.