volvo poster ads
06-22-2004, 06:24 PM
#62
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi Queenie, I notice your S2Ki age is 1 day so you can be forgiven for all sins. 
The old joke "all over Red Rover" is indeed a very old joke. But nothing around here is as old as AusS2000. He's so old geologists take samples....
The post by Naishou with the run & hide emoticon afterwards is a deliberately mischevious post by Naishou. As a punishment I'm sending Fisty down to Sydney to personally teach him about frottage.
BTW, it ain't all over until the fat lady sings. Austblue where are you?
Now, is there anyone else around here who needs an insult today?
The old joke "all over Red Rover" is indeed a very old joke. But nothing around here is as old as AusS2000. He's so old geologists take samples....
The post by Naishou with the run & hide emoticon afterwards is a deliberately mischevious post by Naishou. As a punishment I'm sending Fisty down to Sydney to personally teach him about frottage.
BTW, it ain't all over until the fat lady sings. Austblue where are you?
Now, is there anyone else around here who needs an insult today?
06-22-2004, 06:35 PM
#63
Originally posted by RedRover
The old joke "all over Red Rover" is indeed a very old joke.
The old joke "all over Red Rover" is indeed a very old joke.
06-22-2004, 06:40 PM
#64
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ohhhh thanks RR - thank heavens im a newbie
im sure Austblue will still have something to say i like reading these sorts of discussions, they are all very intelligent arguments, hopefully someone can think of another issue that we can buck heads over.
im sure Austblue will still have something to say
i like reading these sorts of discussions, they are all very intelligent arguments, hopefully someone can think of another issue that we can buck heads over.
06-22-2004, 06:57 PM
#65
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: 3rd bedroom on the right
Posts: 8,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
:warmsupvocalchords:
Im here Mr kettle, or were you the pot
Been out having to work all morning so not much posting
I think now that we've clarified our misunderstandings it seems as though we're in some form of an agreeance
As I mentioned earlier, this ad was never going to be affective within this audience so it wasn't fair to base judgement on our reaction alone but it seems as though you weren't.
As far as developing an unbiased set of categories that would assess every advertisement in an objective manner, I dont think that its a mild task at all and I know that I couldn't do it.
BTW your last statement in the previous post,
"In all of my earlier posts I was commenting on the reaction to the ads from the general public."
[tongueincheek]What was your sample size? How would it even be possible for me to debate the issue that you refer to without seeing the same data as you? Sorry but the abundance of uncontrolled variables in your survey make your assessment (albeit quite imaginitive) worth less than the paper that its written on (and it aint written ).
Perhaps next time that you decide to start a debate you should base your argument on tangible evidence rather that assumations and imaginative survey results so that we avoid discussing the theory of carpet
Oh and bring your balls next time pal[/tongueincheek]
Im here Mr kettle, or were you the pot
Been out having to work all morning so not much postingI think now that we've clarified our misunderstandings it seems as though we're in some form of an agreeance
As I mentioned earlier, this ad was never going to be affective within this audience so it wasn't fair to base judgement on our reaction alone but it seems as though you weren't.
As far as developing an unbiased set of categories that would assess every advertisement in an objective manner, I dont think that its a mild task at all and I know that I couldn't do it.
BTW your last statement in the previous post,
"In all of my earlier posts I was commenting on the reaction to the ads from the general public."
[tongueincheek]What was your sample size? How would it even be possible for me to debate the issue that you refer to without seeing the same data as you? Sorry but the abundance of uncontrolled variables in your survey make your assessment (albeit quite imaginitive) worth less than the paper that its written on (and it aint written
). Perhaps next time that you decide to start a debate you should base your argument on tangible evidence rather that assumations and imaginative survey results so that we avoid discussing the theory of carpet
Oh and bring your balls next time pal[/tongueincheek]
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sticky Dipstick
San Diego S2000 Owners
23
09-29-2005 11:54 AM