Auto Racing Discussion F1, IRL, Champ Car, Nascar, WRC, BTCC, etc. Discuss recent races, results.

KERS will be gone!

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 10, 2009 | 01:07 PM
  #11  
Penforhire's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 8,601
Likes: 1
From: La Habra
Default

This tech makes sense for some other form of racing, say GP2, just not the pinnacle of the sport. F1 is not about being green. It just so irritating to hear feeble attempts to color the combustion of money into speed as "green" in any way.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009 | 02:53 PM
  #12  
gomarlins3's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 23,396
Likes: 108
From: Kuna Idaho
Default

Yeah!!! I prefer straight engine power, but that may be just me.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2009 | 06:20 PM
  #13  
matrix's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 22,863
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Default

Originally Posted by bentheswift,Jun 9 2009, 02:42 PM
I can't say I'm sad to see them go. The problem was not that they were too heavy or complicated (though anyone familiar with Mr. Murphy and his laws knows that adding complexity is just an opportunity for more things to break), the problem was that they were heavily regulated. 80 horsepower boost for 8 seconds... why not allow teams to store as much energy as they want, instead of only 8 seconds worth per lap? Then the regenerative braking and energy storage technologies will be developed (for performance instead of merely lightness, since every team is already making 80hp for 8 seconds per lap) and race cars will be relevant to the real world again. And, there would be different strategies available for going fast, because a heavy KERS system might be able to make 80hp throughout the lap, but would weigh, 40, 80, 100lbs more than the lighter, less powerful cars. But that would be too expensive, says Max Mosley. God forbid we make the engineers compete with eachother! And to think that is what half of F1 used to be about.

Probably 95% of what is known about cars comes directly from race car testing and development. As an engineer, that makes today's situation in F1 downright depressing.
unfortunately true....
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2009 | 06:25 PM
  #14  
boltonblue's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 37,547
Likes: 6,359
From: bolton
Default

I'm starting to see some of the value in the KERS system.

Obviously the MP424 ain't got it this year but on tight tracks KERS kept them in the game at least.
without it.... eh not so much.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2009 | 06:29 PM
  #15  
matrix's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 22,863
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Default

^ just not sure it was worth the development $$$ - that some teams did not have to spend...

Frame that against the FIA budget cap and you can see why the teams are not happy...
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2009 | 07:56 PM
  #16  
Wildncrazy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,771
Likes: 2
Default

I agree that there's merit to KERS, but should it be mandated to be used in a racing league?

Since F1 is a techno series then leave the door open so that if someone were to develop a system that works they can use it, but no 80 hp/8 second cap. Make it worthwhile to develop a system that works. That is also the type of system that would trickle down to the street.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
boltonblue
S2000 Vintage Owners
2
Feb 9, 2014 04:30 PM
Triple-H
Auto Racing Discussion
2
Sep 1, 2011 08:34 AM
brent_strong
Auto Racing Discussion
32
Jun 13, 2011 02:24 PM
GPMike
Auto Racing Discussion
34
Mar 9, 2009 06:08 AM
freq
Delaware Valley S2000 Members
11
Dec 11, 2008 05:35 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:52 AM.