Auto Racing Discussion F1, IRL, Champ Car, Nascar, WRC, BTCC, etc. Discuss recent races, results.

Why wasn't the race restarted?

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 3, 2002 | 10:52 PM
  #1  
tokyo_james's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 65,827
Likes: 2
From: FCUK
Default

Can anyone tell me why the F1 race wasn't restarted? I thought that when they had a amjor smash on the first corner they usually stopped the race and restarted it??

Was there any explanation given? (We have Japanese commentary )

It seemed a shame that after the first corner only about half of the field was still running.....
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2002 | 11:05 PM
  #2  
Cheetah's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte
Default

Yes, it's a shame that so many missed out, but the race is 'usually' only red-flagged when the course is blocked.
Aussie corner workers were very quick in removing cars and major debris
The less safety car the better as far as I'm concerned....one thing I miss about the 'old' days of F1. If the course is dangerous enough for a safety car (for more than a lap or two) then the race should be red flagged.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2002 | 11:08 PM
  #3  
tokyo_james's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 65,827
Likes: 2
From: FCUK
Default

I definitley think that at that stage of the race, bringing the safety car out is not a good thing. There were so many drivers involved that could have used their spare cars had the race been restarted. I don't think that the crowd would have minded waiting for a restart rather than only getting to see "half a race" as it turned out to be.....
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2002 | 03:14 AM
  #4  
ElTianti's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 0
From: Rome, GA
Default

On the hard...

If marshals continue to not allow restarts this greatly reduce the sort of first turn behavior we saw Sunday.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2002 | 02:14 PM
  #5  
tokyo_james's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 65,827
Likes: 2
From: FCUK
Default

Originally posted by ElTianti
On the hard...

If marshals continue to not allow restarts this greatly reduce the sort of first turn behavior we saw Sunday.

I can see your point there, but the rash actions of one driver (Barrichello???) ended the race for almost half of the drivers.

I am not sure whether he had time for the potential consequences of his actions to go through his mind at that point......

Just a thought....
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2002 | 04:10 AM
  #6  
Kobe's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,704
Likes: 1
From: South Staffordshire
Default

the big problem is the decision making process has to happen very fast after the accident - otherwise there is a chaos and people will believe that certain teams have been favored after lobbying.

they normally red flag when somebody has been hurt - which in this case nobody was.

What they are missing is tougher penalties for dangerous driving - either near misses or actual crashes are just brushed off as "racing incidents". Between two cars during the race - maybe OK - but when the driving threatens the whole field then the organisers need to take tough action - even against the star drivers. The paying public, the sponsors have been robbed of their money otherwise.

M.Schumacher was one of the worst for this a few seasons ago as he struggled to start against the Mclarens - he veered all over the track - but nothing was done. Rubens believed he could do the same too since he was in pole.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2002 | 10:23 AM
  #7  
Tifosi Red's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,983
Likes: 0
From: Leyland, Lancs.
Default

Like Kobe says, Charlie Whiting and the other race directors have to make a very quick decision. Prior to the race CW had told the drivers in the breifing that he was going to take a hard line on restarts for circumstances like what occured (baring injury of course) - like ElTianti says there are too many cases where the drivers get to restart the race after a rash manouver in the opening moments (Michael Schumacher is particularly guilty of this - anyone else remember his trick in the Austrian GP a couple of seasons ago where he pulled his stricken car back onto the racing line to try and force a red flag )

Red flags make for better racing as there it allows more cars in the race and don't penalise those innocent parties caught up in the incidents. As it happens I thought Sunday's GP had a lot of great action (MS v JPM / JPM v KR) and of course Minardi and Toyota got points which was great for them.
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Mar 5, 2002 | 11:14 PM
  #8  
Kobe's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,704
Likes: 1
From: South Staffordshire
Default

it seems Rubens and Ralf have escaped with the "racing incident" no blame attached - usual sitting on the fence stuff to appease the big teams.

I think some kind suspended penalty should be enforced for first corner crashes, so any further infringement by them should lose points (if they have any!).

I don't want to have rolling starts like in US racing - nothing beats the buzz of the lights going out and 20 F1 cars launching at the same time.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2002 | 11:18 PM
  #9  
tokyo_james's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 65,827
Likes: 2
From: FCUK
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Kobe
[B]it seems Rubens and Ralf have escaped with the "racing incident"
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2002 | 03:25 AM
  #10  
Kobe's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,704
Likes: 1
From: South Staffordshire
Default

what they should have done is asked for the data logs from Rubens and Ralf's car and checked the braking points versus their other laps - it would be interesting to see if Rubens gave Ralf a "break test" - remember Mark Blundell did that to Rubens a few years ago at Silverstone when he was with Mclaren - he got warned for that.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:15 AM.