Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

2002-2003 C5 Z06

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 6, 2013 | 06:46 PM
  #101  
shuluke's Avatar
15 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 897
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by Moddiction
Been glued to YouTube videos of LS3 corvettes. Damn they are fast!! Stock ones pulling on modded c5z's!

Cams, headers, exhaust, intake and tune seems it can get them to 500whp!
THIS!!! When I see what $5k can do... I cry on the inside. My S needs more than that to hold 400hp safely. But I understand its not made for that. Sad to say I stalk corvette forums as well.. and after seeing a video of a gen 1 CTSV outrun an S in the mountains... I have been looking for a LS motor. Almost ready to pull the trigger...

Originally Posted by TougeS2k
Shuluke,
I was in the same boat having given up an s2000 before and regretting it. So far the only thought I have is wow those people who ragged on f20c torque weren't just being assh*led. The small block pull is enchanting. Mine is bone stock too, I can't wait to put on a more free flowing exhaust/intake!!
Once I finally pull the trigger, my next step is shopping for a cam with exhaust and intake... Hopefully 30+ mpg on the highway as well!

Sounds great... Here is some music for your ears.

http://www.youtube.com/embed/vUtL6gUFIao?feature
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2013 | 10:15 AM
  #102  
JonBoy's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 19,734
Likes: 247
Default

You're crying over what $5K can do on a car that's $10K-$15K more expensive? Sounds to me like you're crying over what $15K+ can do.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2013 | 10:19 AM
  #103  
Moddiction's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 28,698
Likes: 38
From: Mooresville, NC
Default

Of course the S2000 can make 500+whp with 15 grand into it but the corvette can do it insanely reliably and without FI.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2013 | 12:15 PM
  #104  
TheDonEffect's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 8,363
Likes: 636
Default

Originally Posted by JonBoy
You're crying over what $5K can do on a car that's $10K-$15K more expensive? Sounds to me like you're crying over what $15K+ can do.
It's kinda like people crying about how a car is underpowered despite costing 5k less over a decade later.

No, I think he's realizing how ridiculous it is to extract more power out of wringed out 4 cylinders, the fact you could do a full exaust, intake, and tune could bring you to the 11s, be factory reliable, and still flirt with 30mpg. Yeah, I dont see a sub 12 sec s2000 being able to say the same thing. "The s2000 wasn't meant to do that!" Yup.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2013 | 12:19 PM
  #105  
TheDonEffect's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 8,363
Likes: 636
Default

Originally Posted by Moddiction
Of course the S2000 can make 500+whp with 15 grand into it but the corvette can do it insanely reliably and without FI.
Yup, thats part of the beauty about american brutes, I remember going for a joyride in my buddy's Z06 (C6), and that car completely ruined me. Jumped in, turned it on, went for a ride, had some fun, brought it back home, turned the key off, walked back into the house. Next day he woke up, drove to work without giving it a second thought, and continued to do so.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2013 | 01:16 PM
  #106  
TougeS2k's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,442
Likes: 0
From: Tualatin, OR
Default

We're starting some weird corvette coalition here in the depths of s2ki! I love it. One day when I'm not so damn busy I'll take some pics and upload them. Its been almost a month I think and I'm still looking forward to driving the c5z every time I'm not! The new tires and increased experience on the gearbox have created a monster.

And no one can argue the power/reliability of an LS its just been around too long and been too successful. Not to mention they are light and (relatively) small! My z handles much better than my 00' s2k I do however chalk this up to tire width.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2013 | 01:36 PM
  #107  
Moddiction's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 28,698
Likes: 38
From: Mooresville, NC
Default

That's the big issue with the c6's I've been looking into. Tires cost $1600+ each time. If they wear quick that will be very costly!
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2013 | 02:20 PM
  #108  
Chris S's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,615
Likes: 1
From: North Richland Hills, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Moddiction
That's the big issue with the c6's I've been looking into. Tires cost $1600+ each time. If they wear quick that will be very costly!
That's just one reason the C5 Z06's seem to be so popular w/ the track guys. Smaller tires + less power + less weight = similar speed, but lower consumable wear and cheaper replacement costs of them.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2013 | 02:22 PM
  #109  
JonBoy's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 19,734
Likes: 247
Default

Originally Posted by TheDonEffect
Originally Posted by JonBoy' timestamp='1370628921' post='22593605
You're crying over what $5K can do on a car that's $10K-$15K more expensive? Sounds to me like you're crying over what $15K+ can do.
It's kinda like people crying about how a car is underpowered despite costing 5k less over a decade later.

No, I think he's realizing how ridiculous it is to extract more power out of wringed out 4 cylinders, the fact you could do a full exaust, intake, and tune could bring you to the 11s, be factory reliable, and still flirt with 30mpg. Yeah, I dont see a sub 12 sec s2000 being able to say the same thing. "The s2000 wasn't meant to do that!" Yup.
I think you've completely overstated his point.

It's not about getting into the 11s. An S2000 is lucky to hit the high 13s, so it has to gain 2s in the 1/4 to get there. A Vette (more expensive and WAY more powerful to start) has to gain under a second to get to the 11s.

It's about V8s vs I4s in light cars and that brings in the price point. Mustangs have a V8, but they don't hit 11s (typically) because they're fat pigs compared to an S2000. The Vette, while heavier, is still quite light AND it has a V8. It can do that because they spent the money to get it there - hence, the higher price tag than an S2000 (or Mustang).

The person I quoted can get a V8 anywhere, and get big gains from it. That's "cheap". Getting it in a light sports car is a completely different proposition requiring you to spend a lot more money.

Hence, my point. It's silly to compare a $35K S2000 to a $50K LS3 Vette in terms of which has the ability to gain more power. The $50K Vette is only a consideration because it is light and powerful. That means he's talking about a $15K price difference, not a $5K price difference, to get to that amount of power.

An S2000 with that price difference thrown at it will match (or beat) the Vette in a straight line and do it reliably. You can easily add a turbo with a stronger rear end and clutch for $15K and get to equal or better hp-to-weight ratio.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2013 | 03:10 PM
  #110  
Moddiction's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 28,698
Likes: 38
From: Mooresville, NC
Default

^ you will not be nearly as reliable however. Every high hp turbo setup I've seen on here is constant long tinkering, fixing or replacing things.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:44 PM.