2011 base Vette wheels
Originally Posted by Vik2000,May 24 2010, 06:27 PM
not with the driving skills of geezers with base auto convertibles.
Originally Posted by Fapout,May 25 2010, 05:59 AM
Enlightening statement is enlightening. Car that weighs about the same with an engine displacement 3 times that of S2000 will murder 4 cyl car. GETOUTTATOWNTHERESMARTGUY!?!?!?
Originally Posted by [DT
,May 24 2010, 08:25 AM] I think it's pretty funny that a whole thread got dedicated to '11 Corvette wheels.
re: the seats. Yep, just not very good. Speaking of the ZR-1. John C. over on the Corvette forums just posted a couple of recent ZR-1 he did for customers. Of course they're pretty amazing.
I actually read he has talked to GM about offering seating, but they couldn't get past the talking stage.
re: the seats. Yep, just not very good. Speaking of the ZR-1. John C. over on the Corvette forums just posted a couple of recent ZR-1 he did for customers. Of course they're pretty amazing.
I actually read he has talked to GM about offering seating, but they couldn't get past the talking stage.
But
I dont see a snow ball's chance in **** of that happening any time soon. Oh wellish
Originally Posted by [DT
,May 25 2010, 05:22 AM] It's a tough call on the Z06 vs. the GS.
The bodywork on the Z06 looks less busy (vs. the triple gills, even though I appreciate the historical look). Plus you're still up 70HP from the *glorious* hand built 427 (speaking of historical significance) and down 130 lbs.
The trade off is a pretty significant price difference and the really nice perk of the removable roof on the GS. Since the GS has the dry sump setup and all/most of the other running gear it's not giving up much, and the LS3 is certainly capable.
The Z06 will be gone pretty soon (at least in this incarnation). With the GS providing the look/brakes, and the EoS of using the 6.2L, there's kind of no room for a 7.0L used in one vehicle and likely no desire for a power bump (and required certs) to put more distance between it and the GS.
I think any future "high performance" models will be FI (like the ZR-1 and CTS-V).
The bodywork on the Z06 looks less busy (vs. the triple gills, even though I appreciate the historical look). Plus you're still up 70HP from the *glorious* hand built 427 (speaking of historical significance) and down 130 lbs.
The trade off is a pretty significant price difference and the really nice perk of the removable roof on the GS. Since the GS has the dry sump setup and all/most of the other running gear it's not giving up much, and the LS3 is certainly capable.
The Z06 will be gone pretty soon (at least in this incarnation). With the GS providing the look/brakes, and the EoS of using the 6.2L, there's kind of no room for a 7.0L used in one vehicle and likely no desire for a power bump (and required certs) to put more distance between it and the GS.
I think any future "high performance" models will be FI (like the ZR-1 and CTS-V).
Originally Posted by Chris S,May 25 2010, 12:32 PM
I'm so sick of ever increasing wheel sizes just mostly for styling sake.
18's all around would be just right for a car that size to me. Decent ride quality, best tire selection (esp. in R compounds), and more reasonable tire pricing.
18's all around would be just right for a car that size to me. Decent ride quality, best tire selection (esp. in R compounds), and more reasonable tire pricing.
For this particular design wheel (and knowing it would be on the Vette), the 19" is the right way to go. IMO, 18's on a Vette are like 17s on the S2000 - not bad, but just not as good as it could be. True, styling plays a role, but it is not the only reason for upsizing and not to be overdone to a point of caricature looking.
One last point about size and wheel design, some wheel designs look smaller in the same diameters, depending on the way the finishing edge of the wheel meets the tire. For example, the optional 18" Detroit wheels I had on the GTI actually look bigger than the 18" O.Z. Ultraleggeras that I put on the car. And to this point, I say the five spoke Vette wheel could look better if it was larger or it also could look better if they thinned out the leading/finishing edge where the wheel meets the rubber.
EDIT:
To be more clear, this is what I'm referring to in my post:
Originally Posted by PedalFaster,May 24 2010, 09:05 PM
A base auto convertible would still murder an S2000 at... well, everything.
....for $53K I would phucking hope so
Originally Posted by Popeye,May 26 2010, 11:33 AM
WTF does that have to do with goddamn wheels ?
....for $53K I would phucking hope so
....for $53K I would phucking hope so
If you don't think discussing whether the base Corvette is a poseur car is relevant to a thread on wheels, flame the guy who brought it up, not me for responding to him.
Originally Posted by Popeye,May 26 2010, 12:33 PM
WTF does that have to do with goddamn wheels ?
....for $53K I would phucking hope so
....for $53K I would phucking hope so
Originally Posted by Chris S,May 26 2010, 04:12 PM
Alternately, for $33K, I would hope an S2000 would murder a low $20's Cobalt SS...but even the low-buck Chevy handily beats the S.
Originally Posted by Chris S,May 26 2010, 02:12 PM
Alternately, for $33K, I would hope an S2000 would murder a low $20's Cobalt SS...but even the low-buck Chevy handily beats the S.
Neon SRT4s are fast too... who cares? I mean seriously...
The Cobalt SS isn't a bad little car- but anything can be made fast with money - especially when you throw boost/sticky tires at it. Ulitmately its hardly the same. Despsite the performance differences an S2000 and a Corvette are a much more realistic/'fair' comparisons as they are at least sports cars...







