Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

2011 base Vette wheels

Thread Tools
 
Old May 25, 2010 | 09:58 AM
  #61  
S2020's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 112,963
Likes: 150
From: Doh!!
Default

Originally Posted by Vik2000,May 24 2010, 06:27 PM
not with the driving skills of geezers with base auto convertibles.
no, I'm pretty sure those "base auto convertibles" driven by geezers will put a hurting on the S2000 too.
Reply
Old May 25, 2010 | 02:16 PM
  #62  
ZDan's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,863
Likes: 125
From: Pawtucket, RI
Default

Originally Posted by Fapout,May 25 2010, 05:59 AM
Enlightening statement is enlightening. Car that weighs about the same with an engine displacement 3 times that of S2000 will murder 4 cyl car. GETOUTTATOWNTHERESMARTGUY!?!?!?
2750 lb. is "about the same" as 3300?
Reply
Old May 25, 2010 | 07:40 PM
  #63  
wdavis's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
Default

Originally Posted by [DT
,May 24 2010, 08:25 AM] I think it's pretty funny that a whole thread got dedicated to '11 Corvette wheels.

re: the seats. Yep, just not very good. Speaking of the ZR-1. John C. over on the Corvette forums just posted a couple of recent ZR-1 he did for customers. Of course they're pretty amazing.

I actually read he has talked to GM about offering seating, but they couldn't get past the talking stage.
Wish I had more interesting news to report than pics fugly new vette wheels, like "honda introduces dynamic new 2 seat sports car with aggressive lines and power to weight ratio that would make corvette engineers pass out cold and hit the floor like a wet noodle. They'll begin shipping to dealerships in late 2010"......

But

I dont see a snow ball's chance in **** of that happening any time soon. Oh wellish
Reply
Old May 25, 2010 | 09:45 PM
  #64  
20aeman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by [DT
,May 25 2010, 05:22 AM] It's a tough call on the Z06 vs. the GS.

The bodywork on the Z06 looks less busy (vs. the triple gills, even though I appreciate the historical look). Plus you're still up 70HP from the *glorious* hand built 427 (speaking of historical significance) and down 130 lbs.

The trade off is a pretty significant price difference and the really nice perk of the removable roof on the GS. Since the GS has the dry sump setup and all/most of the other running gear it's not giving up much, and the LS3 is certainly capable.

The Z06 will be gone pretty soon (at least in this incarnation). With the GS providing the look/brakes, and the EoS of using the 6.2L, there's kind of no room for a 7.0L used in one vehicle and likely no desire for a power bump (and required certs) to put more distance between it and the GS.

I think any future "high performance" models will be FI (like the ZR-1 and CTS-V).
Z06 still has appeal due to the Z07 and carbon packages. People still prefer pseudo big block normally aspirated power over the LS9.
Reply
Old May 26, 2010 | 05:22 AM
  #65  
MrClean's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,207
Likes: 1
From: Powell, OH
Default

Originally Posted by Chris S,May 25 2010, 12:32 PM
I'm so sick of ever increasing wheel sizes just mostly for styling sake.

18's all around would be just right for a car that size to me. Decent ride quality, best tire selection (esp. in R compounds), and more reasonable tire pricing.
I understand what you are saying and there is a point where you can go too far. But, what I said was not meant to be a blanket statement for all wheels - nor should your statement be taken that way. If that was the case, I would have bought 19s for my GTI instead of the 18" Ultraleggeras that I did get (looked more appropriate, proportionately, for the size car and wheel wells). Same for the Cayman, it would have been 20s instead of the 19s. It all depends on the car size, the wheels wells and the wheel design.

For this particular design wheel (and knowing it would be on the Vette), the 19" is the right way to go. IMO, 18's on a Vette are like 17s on the S2000 - not bad, but just not as good as it could be. True, styling plays a role, but it is not the only reason for upsizing and not to be overdone to a point of caricature looking.

One last point about size and wheel design, some wheel designs look smaller in the same diameters, depending on the way the finishing edge of the wheel meets the tire. For example, the optional 18" Detroit wheels I had on the GTI actually look bigger than the 18" O.Z. Ultraleggeras that I put on the car. And to this point, I say the five spoke Vette wheel could look better if it was larger or it also could look better if they thinned out the leading/finishing edge where the wheel meets the rubber.



EDIT:
To be more clear, this is what I'm referring to in my post:
Reply
Old May 26, 2010 | 10:33 AM
  #66  
Popeye's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 21,530
Likes: 17
From: Gleening the apex
Default

Originally Posted by PedalFaster,May 24 2010, 09:05 PM
A base auto convertible would still murder an S2000 at... well, everything.
WTF does that have to do with goddamn wheels ?

....for $53K I would phucking hope so

Reply
Old May 26, 2010 | 11:41 AM
  #67  
PedalFaster's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,014
Likes: 1
From: Seattle, WA
Default

Originally Posted by Popeye,May 26 2010, 11:33 AM
WTF does that have to do with goddamn wheels ?

....for $53K I would phucking hope so
Dude, what's with the mass reading comprehension fail?

If you don't think discussing whether the base Corvette is a poseur car is relevant to a thread on wheels, flame the guy who brought it up, not me for responding to him.
Reply
Old May 26, 2010 | 12:12 PM
  #68  
Chris S's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,615
Likes: 1
From: North Richland Hills, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Popeye,May 26 2010, 12:33 PM
WTF does that have to do with goddamn wheels ?

....for $53K I would phucking hope so
Alternately, for $33K, I would hope an S2000 would murder a low $20's Cobalt SS...but even the low-buck Chevy handily beats the S.
Reply
Old May 26, 2010 | 02:33 PM
  #69  
sparrow's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,899
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Chris S,May 26 2010, 04:12 PM
Alternately, for $33K, I would hope an S2000 would murder a low $20's Cobalt SS...but even the low-buck Chevy handily beats the S.
oh lawd y can we never have a good vette/gtr/lfa/rx7 thread
Reply
Old May 27, 2010 | 01:26 AM
  #70  
rnye's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,852
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

Originally Posted by Chris S,May 26 2010, 02:12 PM
Alternately, for $33K, I would hope an S2000 would murder a low $20's Cobalt SS...but even the low-buck Chevy handily beats the S.
The hopped FWD econo car that was released 5 years after the S2000?

Neon SRT4s are fast too... who cares? I mean seriously... The Cobalt SS isn't a bad little car- but anything can be made fast with money - especially when you throw boost/sticky tires at it. Ulitmately its hardly the same. Despsite the performance differences an S2000 and a Corvette are a much more realistic/'fair' comparisons as they are at least sports cars...
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:33 AM.