Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

2012 GTR

Thread Tools
 
Old May 17, 2010 | 08:48 PM
  #1  
bigtd85's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Default 2012 GTR

[We're beginning to hear the first rumblings about the next round of updates to the Nissan GT-R, and if the rumors are to be believed, Nissan's goal of keeping pace with the refreshed Porsche 911 Turbo (and its S sibling) will continue through the 2012 model year.

As with its German counterpart, the R35 is expected to undergo a host of evolutionary changes, including some reworked aero bits, suspension and brake upgrades, and a retuned 3.8-liter twin-turbo V6 that's likely to output over 500 horsepower and 450 pound-feet of torque.

The exterior updates will likely be limited to a new front splitter, rear diffuser and a revised wing, all in an effort to increase downforce and drop lap times. And about those lap times...

We've heard from our sources on the ground in Germany that the revised GT-R underwent a new round of testing at the Nurburgring last month and that the newly estimated lap times were (of course) below the original GT-R's 7:26 run. How low? We're hoping to find out when it arrives early next year.
][/QUOTE] from Autoblog.

do want..
Reply
Old May 17, 2010 | 09:51 PM
  #2  
Steponme's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,825
Likes: 1
Default

What it needs most is a weightloss. It is already a track monster as is, lose 300lbs and bam!
Reply
Old May 18, 2010 | 06:27 AM
  #3  
TheDonEffect's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 8,362
Likes: 636
Default

Don't make it faster. Make it more durable.
Reply
Old May 18, 2010 | 06:28 AM
  #4  
UmarS2K's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,678
Likes: 0
Default

Sounds nice.
Reply
Old May 18, 2010 | 07:01 AM
  #5  
flexer's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 4
Default

YAY another car with more power....I can easily do that with the aftermarket for cheap. MAKE IT LIGHTER!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Now that is something I can't do for cheap.
Reply
Old May 18, 2010 | 07:09 AM
  #6  
zet's Avatar
zet
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

And make it come in 6spd....at least an option
Reply
Old May 18, 2010 | 07:34 AM
  #7  
Saki GT's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 36,017
Likes: 226
From: Queen City, NC
Default

Funny how some basic things seem to be overlooked with this update... at least it will work on paper - bigger numbers!
Reply

Trending Topics

Old May 18, 2010 | 08:11 AM
  #8  
exb00st's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,271
Likes: 0
Default

Is the SpecV lighter?
Reply
Old May 18, 2010 | 08:15 AM
  #9  
fishfryer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,426
Likes: 0
Default

I wonder if the new GTR still has the modified launch control that keeps it from grenading some of the drivetrain or did they beef those parts up a little bit? Hopefully it is less ugly too, with that said, I'd like to have one for a while and beat the crap out of it.
Reply
Old May 18, 2010 | 09:05 AM
  #10  
[DT]'s Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,619
Likes: 0
From: Vilano Beach, FL
Default

Originally Posted by exb00st,May 18 2010, 11:11 AM
Is the SpecV lighter?
This is from Inside Line:

Time To Lose Weight

Sitting here on the asphalt at Tochigi, the 2009 Nissan GT-R SpecV looks more menacing than the standard GT-R. It wears $5,900 in optional Ultimate Black Opal paint (a shade of deep purple), as well as a grille, front brake ducts and rear wing made from lightweight carbon fiber. The forged-aluminum 20-inch wheels by Rays Engineering also reduce weight. To shed further pounds, Mizuno also directed the removal of the two tight-fitting rear seats, replacing them with soft plastic covers. The Recaro seats up front are built up from thin carbon-fiber shells to reduce weight as well.

All told, the SpecV lost 132 pounds, dropping its curb weight to 3,704 pounds. To tell the truth, though, we really had hoped as much as 220 pounds could have been dropped from the bottom line.

So for all the weight-loss-chest-pounding, the difference vs. a "regular" GT-R is only 132 lbs.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:45 PM.