2013 GTR
I love the gtr. I am hoping when the time comes they will be an affordable choice as another car and that they are similar to the S in the way most people didn't drive them to much. Its hard to argue with the size and weight of the car when it is laying down 0-60 times in the realm of 2.72 sec. When you figure that Veyron Super Sport does 0-60 in 2.4 sec it really shows just how amazing a value the GTR really is. I love it and maybe just maybe that weight is a factor in allowing it to do these things so well.
Originally Posted by Manga_Spawn' timestamp='1322766918' post='21202040
I love the gtr. I am hoping when the time comes they will be an affordable choice as another car and that they are similar to the S in the way most people didn't drive them to much. Its hard to argue with the size and weight of the car when it is laying down 0-60 times in the realm of 2.72 sec. When you figure that Veyron Super Sport does 0-60 in 2.4 sec it really shows just how amazing a value the GTR really is. I love it and maybe just maybe that weight is a factor in allowing it to do these things so well.
Originally Posted by Manga_Spawn' timestamp='1322766918' post='21202040
I love the gtr. I am hoping when the time comes they will be an affordable choice as another car and that they are similar to the S in the way most people didn't drive them to much. Its hard to argue with the size and weight of the car when it is laying down 0-60 times in the realm of 2.72 sec. When you figure that Veyron Super Sport does 0-60 in 2.4 sec it really shows just how amazing a value the GTR really is. I love it and maybe just maybe that weight is a factor in allowing it to do these things so well.
Also, I believe it is pretty widely accepted that Nissan toyed with the business model to get the price down to give the perception of value...ie they put hard limits on warranties, use of launch control (now repealed of course), hugely expensive parts, frequent maintenance intervals, claim denials, etc. It is the complete opposite of say a GT3 that Porsche built for the track and openly encourages you to track the car.
I like the car; would never buy one as at that price, I don't really care if it is a good value, I don't really care if it is just a hair slower than a veyron to 60...I just car that I'm in love with the car...and I'm just not in love with the GTR.
It is absolutely a performer, though.
That's simply not possible. Lateral G's are 90% tires. There's no street tire that can exceed 1.1G on a car that's 3800lb. You'd need ridiculous banking well beyond what you'll see on any race track to reach 2.3G, much less 2.8. It's important to note they didn't say sustained values of 2.3G. Instant values will vary wildly, but aren't too important.
Originally Posted by JonBoy' timestamp='1322668270' post='21197651
2.3g in the corner with Nissan seeing 2.8g on the Nurburgring? That's an awfully high spike, considering most cars won't generate much more than 2.0g on sudden turn in. 0.8g higher is 40% more!
That's simply not possible. Lateral G's are 90% tires. There's no street tire that can exceed 1.1G on a car that's 3800lb. You'd need ridiculous banking well beyond what you'll see on any race track to reach 2.3G, much less 2.8. It's important to note they didn't say sustained values of 2.3G. Instant values will vary wildly, but aren't too important.
Nissan didn't clarify where (specifically) they saw 2.8g but something like the Carousel in the Nurburgring might allow for a spike that high...
Either way $1200 is beyond rip off territory. No way that job should ever breach $400 and that's being generous.
Originally Posted by sparrow' timestamp='1322793833' post='21203245
This, Manga must not have seen the cost of the brakes and fluid changes such as the trans fluid. Nissan pricing to purchase with Ferrari maintenance costs. IIRC it was 1200 for the dealer to change the trans fluid for a guy on nagtroc.
Either way $1200 is beyond rip off territory. No way that job should ever breach $400 and that's being generous.










