Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

2013 Shelby Pricings is....$54,995! DAMN!

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-24-2012, 07:22 AM
  #31  

 
Presto123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Miramar, FloriDUH
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by iTurn
Originally Posted by e3opian' timestamp='1332512039' post='21536568
Another 100HP for 2013? My brother in law is going to be pissed. They just bought last October.
A lot more changes than that too lol

Bigger brakes all around 6 pistons up front, 5.8, bigger supercharger, torsen available, launch control, Carbon driveshaft, stiffer chassis, retuned suspension, strenghten trans and 3.31 rear gears.

The 2012 guys really got it man
It's like the same thing that happened when the new 5.0 motor was put in the current GT.
Old 03-25-2012, 06:35 PM
  #32  
Registered User
 
herfalerf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by macdaddies911
Originally Posted by R3D L1N3' timestamp='1332295951' post='21528645
really too bad they still opt for the rear live axle : / Thats what makes me think New ZL1 > GT500
I swear I'm the only one that HATES the camaro.
im with you too, im a valet and i drive rental v6 comaros every day. the windshield is the tiniest piece of crap ever, i can hardly see out of the damn car and im not a short person by any means. it also has absolutely TERRIBLE blind spots. the only car that even comes close to being as horrid to see out of is the... wait for it... mustang. the way i see these american muscle cars they are fast and they look good now, but in 5 years it will look worse and in 10 it will look like a beater, because 90% of them will be actual beaters driven by people who dont care. its a lot like the Cadillac cts. i thought it looked great when it first came out and i still love the new ones, but the old ones did not age well they look cheap even compared to a 3 series from the same era.

i got to drive a gt500 the other day, it was brand new still with dealer plates on it. it was nice, but it was very clearly still a mustang. id rather shell out the 65k or so for a used GTR.
Old 03-25-2012, 06:42 PM
  #33  
Former Moderator

 
NFRs2000NYC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 18,852
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Just built mine, came out to 66K. IMHO, a phenomenal value. An M3 similarly equipped will be near 80k...and lets be honest, an M3 is not as fast. A very serious contender for my next toy. A few year ago, I could have sworn off American cars for good. Now, after getting my Wrangler, and falling in love with the Mustang, I really think it will be in my garage next year.
Old 03-26-2012, 06:45 AM
  #34  
Registered User

 
deepbluejh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

You know, just for kicks, I'd test drive this car back to back with a Z06 before I bought either one. There is much that you can't learn from a spec sheet.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JamieS2K
Car Talk - Non S2000
29
10-04-2010 02:31 AM
exb00st
Car and Bike Talk
30
01-13-2010 05:03 PM
Skip
S2000 Talk
4
09-02-2006 06:51 AM
batikan
Car and Bike Talk
3
03-19-2006 02:17 PM



Quick Reply: 2013 Shelby Pricings is....$54,995! DAMN!



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:17 AM.