Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

3000gt

Thread Tools
 
Old May 8, 2010 | 04:48 PM
  #31  
Mr.Aqua's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 2
From: San Diego
Default

My wife has a 94 SL. So far its gone through a rebuilt engine, rebuilt tranny, new brakes, numerous starters, new alternator, but she loves it. It actually isn't a bad car. Its very roomy and comfortable to take on long drives to Vegas, etc. It's a nice change of pace to drive a bigger GT car.
Reply
Old May 8, 2010 | 09:27 PM
  #32  
hondafrvr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by hondafrvr,May 8 2010, 12:16 AM
I've done no research on the car.
Base model and SL have same power though right?
Base model.

It has a very solid feel to it (it does weigh 3700 lbs so this makes sense)
I've driven my new to me 94 Miata over 500 miles this week and every minute of it was a blast.
The 3000gt, I drove for 5 minutes but I couldn't get over how solid the car feels (I don't like the heavy feel of a car). To each his own.

Ofcourse, that heavy feel is also amazing when my friend took his car upto like 90/100. Felt like 50 mph lol.

I like the way it looks, and its comfortable.
Just not a sports car. Definitely a sporty GT though.

Anyway, would love to test drive a VR4!
Reply
Old May 8, 2010 | 09:31 PM
  #33  
hondafrvr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
Default

Also, before anyone flames me for trying to compare a Miata and 3000gt, I've only done so because I was considering a whole host of cars because I was just tired of auto family sedans/econoboxes. This is a good option!
Reply
Old May 8, 2010 | 09:32 PM
  #34  
hondafrvr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
Default

Oh BTW, whats the 0 to 60 on the base 3000gt?
It felt a lot faster than my Miata which again is no benchmark cuz thats like 8 seconds? I never timed it.
Reply
Old May 9, 2010 | 12:33 AM
  #35  
exb00st's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,271
Likes: 0
Default

hondafrvr- the base 3000GT doesn't weigh 3700, it's around 3500 or so. The 5 speed is high 6's and the auto is mid 7's. The VR-4 will do high 4's.
Reply
Old May 9, 2010 | 01:35 AM
  #36  
hellaSleepy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco
Default

[QUOTE=Steponme,May 7 2010, 02:17 PM]Is that the base model, not even the SL?
Reply
Old May 9, 2010 | 05:23 AM
  #37  
Chris S's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,615
Likes: 1
From: North Richland Hills, TX
Default

Originally Posted by exb00st,May 9 2010, 02:33 AM
The VR-4 will do high 4's.
We're talking stock, not modded. I'd expect pigs to fly before a stock VR4 would do sub-5 sec. 0-60 times.

320 hp doesn't propel 4000+ lbs. (w/ driver/fuel) that fast.
Reply
Old May 9, 2010 | 09:30 AM
  #38  
exb00st's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,271
Likes: 0
Default

Wrong.

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/112_97...urbo/index.html
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/112_97...art3/index.html

I've also attended 3Si events where stock cars did 4's to 60 stock via radar/laser.
Reply
Old May 9, 2010 | 01:30 PM
  #39  
Mr.E.G.'s Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,281
Likes: 119
Default

[QUOTE=Chris S,May 9 2010, 05:23 AM] We're talking stock, not modded.
Reply
Old May 9, 2010 | 03:49 PM
  #40  
Chris S's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,615
Likes: 1
From: North Richland Hills, TX
Default

Originally Posted by exb00st,May 9 2010, 11:30 AM
Wrong.

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/112_97...urbo/index.html
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/112_97...art3/index.html

I've also attended 3Si events where stock cars did 4's to 60 stock via radar/laser.
The first source I found had much slower times.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:21 AM.