Acura RDX
http://www.caranddriver.com/comparisons/13...-acura-rdx.html
You know I wouldnt mind the RDX if it didnt look so...well UGLY. I mean I believe Honda could do better with the styling of this vehicle. The hardware seems amazing but come on. Anybody else in agreement?
You know I wouldnt mind the RDX if it didnt look so...well UGLY. I mean I believe Honda could do better with the styling of this vehicle. The hardware seems amazing but come on. Anybody else in agreement?
Originally Posted by Slamnasty,Jun 19 2007, 04:16 PM
I think it smokes the X3 in the looks department. I could definitely see myself buying an RDX if I were in that market. It's a real soft-roader though.
To me the RDX looked better as a concept, but the production version still isn't that bad. The interior is also very slick in my opinion. From what I read it easily outperforms the X3, but the ride is a little on the stiff side (as is for the x3). If I were shopping for an all weather car I would definitely take a look at the RDX.
I *hate* the way it looks, it seems very nosey. Shame because the MDX is actually sexy, and as stated that hardware on the RDX is appealing. I just can't get past that front end. And it seems that a lot of people agree because they are a rare bird out on the road.
It's a different look but to me it's light years ahead of the X3 (which looks like a poor rendition of a Doc Martens boot on wheels). I'd have no problem driving one, though I prefer the look of the new MDX.
The interior is also very nice in the RDX. I have yet to drive one but it is supposed to be very, very sporty (as good as many so-called "sport sedans").
The interior is also very nice in the RDX. I have yet to drive one but it is supposed to be very, very sporty (as good as many so-called "sport sedans").
Trending Topics
We test drove the RDX and the (07) X3 back to back, the RDX is ever so slightly quicker off the line, but lacked in the mid-range. The RDX did not ride well or handle that well either. We also couldn't stand the abundance of hard plastic on the dash. Looks are purely subjective, but I think the X3 looks better in and out. The pre 07 is a different story. So, we went with the X3...
Yeah BMW really did an overhaul on the latest 07. They basically addressed most of the problem.
I didnt ask if the RDX was better than the X3. I was just talking about if anybody cared for the outside looks. If it boils down to it, I'd prefer an X3 to the rdx. (not by much though)
I didnt ask if the RDX was better than the X3. I was just talking about if anybody cared for the outside looks. If it boils down to it, I'd prefer an X3 to the rdx. (not by much though)
^^ I had high hopes for the RDX when we saw it in 05 at the Detroit auto show (as a concept). I was/am very against an SUV (or SAV in BMW speak
) because I really don't like them, but the X3 drives like a jacked-up 328xi with more power. That and the lease rates on the 3 series wagons is crazy, silly high. Let's just say my wife won the X3 argument...
) because I really don't like them, but the X3 drives like a jacked-up 328xi with more power. That and the lease rates on the 3 series wagons is crazy, silly high. Let's just say my wife won the X3 argument...









