Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Another S2000 replacement rumor..

Thread Tools
 
Old May 12, 2014 | 07:12 AM
  #11  
Marioshi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,094
Likes: 18
From: Sacramento, CA
Default

I do like the rendering although it doesn't say the source.

35k GBP would mean roughly 60k USD at current exchange rates. Honda would likely make it cheaper for the US (the usually do) but still, 350hp is not going to be competetive unless its lightweight. Turbo/hybrid/AWD is not going to be lightweight. Bummer.
Reply
Old May 12, 2014 | 07:16 AM
  #12  
Gymkata's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,720
Likes: 0
Default



I'd buy one if it looks like this. Oh, wait...
Reply
Old May 12, 2014 | 07:17 AM
  #13  
spessx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 448
Likes: 1
From: Austin
Default

Here's another article:

http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-to...ine-coupe.html

Much like the NSX, I expect this new S2000 will enter production on the 10th of Nebuary.
Reply
Old May 12, 2014 | 07:23 AM
  #14  
Ouhei's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,421
Likes: 5
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

If it's mid engined then it's not a new s2000. The s2000 is a front engined, RWD convertible. So unless they're coming out with that, please stop calling this a new s2000.

I would love a 300-350HP sports coupe from Honda though, too bad by the time it gets made I'll need something with a real back seat, haha.
Reply
Old May 12, 2014 | 07:24 AM
  #15  
Nic01101011's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by VilleS2K
I'd be happy with the following in an "S3000:"

-similar chassis
-more modern body (I like this rendering)
-stronger rear differential (although this has not been an issue for me)
-traction/stability control that can be fully deactivated (is this even allowed in new cars?)
-curb weight under 3,000 pounds
-RWD
-3.0 high revving V6 in the 330-350 horsepower range (give it a green/eco mode where you can make it run on 4 cylinders while cruising)

At this point though, I'd probably take what this article describes.
Z4M roadster ?
Part of me is still wondering if I should have just got one of those.
They are definitely well over 3000lbs, though.
Reply
Old May 12, 2014 | 07:41 AM
  #16  
electricmarauder's Avatar
Registered User
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 258
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by Ouhei
If it's mid engined then it's not a new s2000. The s2000 is a front engined, RWD convertible. So unless they're coming out with that, please stop calling this a new s2000.

I would love a 300-350HP sports coupe from Honda though, too bad by the time it gets made I'll need something with a real back seat, haha.
The engine sits behind the front axle so it can be considered mid-engined, more specifically front-mid engined
Reply
Old May 12, 2014 | 07:53 AM
  #17  
Saki GT's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 36,017
Likes: 226
From: Queen City, NC
Default

Originally Posted by spessx
Much like the NSX, I expect this new S2000 will enter production on the 10th of Nebuary.
My thoughts exactly - once Honda starts talking about a replacement, it only takes another 12-13 years to see it to fruition it seems!
Reply
Old May 12, 2014 | 08:29 AM
  #18  
vader1's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,952
Likes: 478
From: MAHT-O-MEDI
Default

Originally Posted by spessx
Here's another article:

http://www.leftlanenews.com/honda-to...ine-coupe.html

Much like the NSX, I expect this new S2000 will enter production on the 10th of Nebuary.

That article (and I get this is ALL rumor and speculation) suggests a price of about $59,000 US.



HA! Um, no. Try $45k. $59k is more than a Corvette, just shy of a Cayman S without the performance of the former and the panache of the latter is a complete non-starter. But I am just magazine article racing at this point.
Reply
Old May 12, 2014 | 09:26 AM
  #19  
JonBoy's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 19,734
Likes: 247
Default

I like the idea of a hybrid along the lines of the NSX or McLaren P1 technology. "Torque fill" for low-end torque (using electric power) with big top-end due to turbos/higher revs is a great combination.

Do I like the simplicity of a possible high-revving V6? Yes! Would I prefer it? Probably (if only for the sake of simplicity and weight). But times are changing and the blending of very reliable electric motors into cars gives a ton of performance improvement in ways previously unheard of. You can now have your cake (low down torque) and eat it too (top end power and fuel economy). You add weight, of course, but everything is heavy now so who cares (except ZDan)?
Reply
Old May 12, 2014 | 06:51 PM
  #20  
genexrocket's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default

Remember this in 2009?
http://www.autoblog.com/2009/07/15/r...placement-com/

this in 2010?
http://www.motortrend.com/future/fut...beat_into_one/

And this in 2013?
http://www.topspeed.com/cars/car-new...-ar160336.html

Sorry, it's never gonna happen...
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:30 PM.