Buick ties Lexus for No. 1 in car reliability
#51
You American car bashers are ridiculous. What do you want? GM to go under? Is that what you want? Will you be happy then? Seriously, if they ever did go under....that means the US had just become a 3rd world nation. I don't think you appreciate exactly what they do and how many people they employ and that affect the overall economy. Anyone, who states otherwise is an ignorant prick.
#52
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Irvine
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GPMike,Aug 12 2007, 02:10 PM
You American car bashers are ridiculous. What do you want? GM to go under? Is that what you want? Will you be happy then? Seriously, if they ever did go under....that means the US had just become a 3rd world nation. I don't think you appreciate exactly what they do and how many people they employ and that affect the overall economy. Anyone, who states otherwise is an ignorant prick.
#53
Originally Posted by brucek2,Aug 12 2007, 02:17 PM
No one wants them to go under. We just want them to build better quality cars. Look inside a Buick and an equally priced Lexus. Which car is built better, with better quality products, plastics, leathers, etc.?
Look under the hood, however, and the Buick is nicer.
#54
Originally Posted by kadeshpa,Aug 9 2007, 05:32 AM
I guess you guys haven't seen the new Buick Enclave. In the metro area here, they're selling like hotcakes.
#56
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Palo Alto
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CR and JD Powers have both said that short term reliability is a leading indicator of long term reliability. Basically, if the car has been good for 3 odds are it will be good for 7 or 10 etc.
#57
Originally Posted by rockville,Aug 12 2007, 03:58 PM
CR and JD Powers have both said that short term reliability is a leading indicator of long term reliability. Basically, if the car has been good for 3 odds are it will be good for 7 or 10 etc.
#58
Originally Posted by AlX Boi,Aug 12 2007, 03:14 PM
Do hotcakes sell really well? Where can I get some?
#59
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Palo Alto
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by kumainu,Aug 12 2007, 04:05 PM
That is somewhat true, but some cars, not specifically which, tend to start having problems in later years. To me, a reliability test is more meaningful at 100K miles.
Yes, we can't tell which cars will have things like a high percentage of coil failures at say 70,000 miles (some VWs and some Miatas). However, the general trend holds true. This is the same idea that makes us trust buying an Accord. Because the current Accord has been out since what '04 we don't actually know how well the current car will run after say 8 years because none are that old. We can assume it will be good based on older Accords but not based on the service record of the current Accord.
Based on the service record of all Miata's the '99-'00 cars should not have coil pack issues because the previous Miatas didn't have issues.
Again, while a lack of short term issues does not guaranty long term reliability CR and JD Powers both agree that it is a strong historical indicator. Thus if 2004 Buicks do well over 3 years they will likely do well over the longer haul. Hence the reason many people on this board shouldn
#60
[QUOTE=rockville,Aug 12 2007, 05:31 PM] Again, while a lack of short term issues does not guaranty long term reliability CR and JD Powers both agree that it is a strong historical indicator. Thus if 2004 Buicks do well over 3 years they will likely do well over the longer haul. Hence the reason many people on this board shouldn