Cayman S Road Test Data
Originally Posted by QUIKAG,Oct 7 2005, 05:52 AM
After spending a fair bit of time in a new Z06, I just cannot imagine why ANYONE would want a Cayman S.
Not saying this is a good or bad thing; just saying people buy the car just for the name.
Originally Posted by QUIKAG,Oct 7 2005, 08:52 AM
After spending a fair bit of time in a new Z06, I just cannot imagine why ANYONE would want a Cayman S.
I imagin MSRP al least for the first few months, but can get good dicount at this tme next year.
A new owner got 9k off on his '05 leftover BS. Not saying you could get that much off on a CS though... it depends on if it sells or not and how badly the dealer wants to off load it.
A new owner got 9k off on his '05 leftover BS. Not saying you could get that much off on a CS though... it depends on if it sells or not and how badly the dealer wants to off load it.
Originally Posted by JonBoy,Oct 7 2005, 01:41 PM
Some of us mere mortals that aren't used to 505 hp and have neither the time or location to fully apply it will find 295 hp and a smaller, more forgiving chassis (and motor) somewhat more appropriate for our pedestrian lives. 

100%....however that doesn't make a Cayman S at $65K (essential options) or $75K (as tested) a good deal. Porsche is charging real money for a car that is closer preformance-wise to an Elise than a Z06. -- those tests scores are right on top of an Elise but the price is $20K-$30K more...
My point is, not even 300-hp for a mid-$60s- mid-$70s car
The Z06 is more than most people need, but it's like you can get a super-Size Value-meal or a Happy meal for the same money.
Cayman S costs (at least) 2x as much as a S2000 (gets you 0.5s in the 1/4 mile). You can buy a S2000 + EVO MR (at least) for that money.
As someone said before: 295hp BS, 325hp CS and 355hp 911 makes me a lot more happy for ~60k ~70K and ~80K +/-
Cayman S costs (at least) 2x as much as a S2000 (gets you 0.5s in the 1/4 mile). You can buy a S2000 + EVO MR (at least) for that money.
Why did'nt you get a used miata + a used Accord instead of your S2000?
Originally Posted by rai,Oct 8 2005, 05:49 PM
100%....however that doesn't make a Cayman S at $65K (essential options) or $75K (as tested) a good deal. Porsche is charging real money for a car that is more close preformance-wise to an Elise than a Z06. -- those tests scores are right on top of an Elise but the price is $20K-$30K more...
My point is, not even 300-hp for a mid-$60s- mid-$70s car
The Z06 is more than most people need, but it's like you can get a super-Size Value-meal or a Happy meal for the same money.
Cayman S costs (at least) 2x as much as a S2000 (gets you 0.5s in the 1/4 mile). You can buy a S2000 + EVO MR (at least) for that money.
As someone said before: 295hp BS, 325hp CS and 355hp 911 makes me a lot more happy for ~60k ~70K and ~80K +/-
If this was the argument though, MBZ would never sell an E or S class as you can just get a Ford Taurus or Crawn Victoria at 1/3 the price.
Not saying it's a wrong argument, just one that I would never use.
That being said , I don't think I will be getting a Porsche anytime in the near future, as I said they really short changed us on the hp. Until they are offering $6K-$8K discounts again, then the Porsche Carrera S will be where I think it should be priced.
I know some people will say this doesn't make sense, but everybody has their own sense of "value." To me if the Carrera S was the Carrera (or at least priced around there) I would have bought it. Their 325 hp offering was a joke. The rest of the industry has passed them by, but they doggedly insist on sticking to their diluted hp increase schedule (a few hp every few years). They offer a "regular" model, now an upgraded "S" model, then they will shortly be offering a "powerkit to boost hp up to 381 hp on the Carrera S. Give me a break. It should have been Carrera with 355 hp, and Carrera S with the 381 hp to start with.
Originally Posted by steve c,Oct 8 2005, 10:11 AM
Again with the multiple cars.
Why did'nt you get a used miata + a used Accord instead of your S2000?
Why did'nt you get a used miata + a used Accord instead of your S2000?

Point is, a EVO MR or an Elise by themselves are a close aproximation of a Cayman S (performance) you could probably get them both for a near the same price as nicely optioned Cayman.
From my point of view, the Cayman lookes high-priced while the Z06 looks low-priced for what you get. IMO.
IMO the Boxster or Cayman should be entry level Porsche cars like a 944 was back in the day. More power to them if they can get mid-70s for them. Just seems like we're at the NSX (price-performance) all over again.
EDIT: turn the question around, why did I buy a S2000 instead of a NSX? That's what we're talknig about with the difference b/t a S2000 and a Cayman S is like the difference b/t a S2000 and a NSX for roughly the same money.








