View Poll Results: Is Enzo an ugly car?
Voters: 139. You may not vote on this poll
Is Enzo an ugly car?
08-12-2008, 10:19 PM
#21
Originally Posted by JonBoy,Aug 12 2008, 08:24 PM
It's aesthetically ugly but functionally beautiful. 
08-12-2008, 10:33 PM
#22
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Harbor City, CA
Posts: 5,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Haha, all you people that voted "ugly", I'd garuntee you haven't seen one in person or in motion. That thing is CRAZY! It's a different kind of sexy, not the Aston Martin clean kinda sexy, but it just looks like a spaceship.
08-12-2008, 11:00 PM
#23
Registered User
I've seen one in person (parked and on the streets), and it's amazingly beautiful. Photos do not do it justice. The styling is pretty in-your-face, but it should be when the car costs that much and is that fast.
08-13-2008, 05:03 AM
#26
Registered User
Let me explain why I voted "ugly" and called it "contrived." IMO, it's a sports car trying to look like a formula car, and therefore fails at achieving either in any aesthetically pleasing manner. Therefore it also fails, for me, from a form-follows-function perspective because the design isn't based so much on function as it is on trying to emulate F1. Now, it's predecessors, the F40 and F50, ARE beautiful machines, from both a purely aesthetics point of view as well as a mechanical achievement POV... The Koenigsegg is just as fast (faster, really) and infinitely more beautiful. Heck, even the 599 is almost as fast as the Enzo, and it too is the superior looker.
08-13-2008, 07:34 AM
#28
Registered User
I saw one at Jack in the Box a few years ago. I have also seen the same one at PIR up close. It's not a pretty car. It's cool. It's badass, but I stand by my assertion...it's ugly. I would rock one in a nanosec though.
