Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Evolution of Cars

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 23, 2011 | 07:57 AM
  #31  
cbehney's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,687
Likes: 16
From: No VA
Default

Originally Posted by NuncoStr8
It does all "depend." But the idea that you can never experience the benefits of a car with higher limits on the street is an ignorant statement. Ever merged on a freeway? I'm guessing you haven't because you stated you will never get close to the limits of your car. Those of us who have merged onto freeways have indeed experienced the limits of our cars.

Ever passed a car on a two-lane road? I'm guessing you haven't, because you stated "On the street I will never be anywhere near the limit of what my car is capable of." Those of us who drive two lane roads have actually approached the limits of our cars' limitations while passing, in the interest of passing safely.

Ever had someone on a multi-lane road cross into your lane? Unless you piled into them because your car could not brake fast enough or maneuver out of the way while maintaining control, you've benefitted from driving a car with higher limits, with a larger performance envelope than other cars. It is the height of ignorance to suggest that 0-60 is the ultimate and encompassing measure of a car's total performance. And that attitude is what leads people to think that "You can never use it's potential on the street."

Ever have a deer cross the road while you are driving and been able to avoid it? I am guessing not, because anyone who has will testify to the responsiveness and stabilty of their vehicle for avoiding the accident.

Don't comment on things you know nothing about. Your theory that nobody ever approaches the limit of their car on public roads is a theory formulated by someone who has a very limited experience of driving. This apparently describes you, by your own testimony. So in the future please refrain from thinking your input is relevant.
I should stay out of it, but... Nunco, come on, I know you say some outrageous things on here but you also say some really insightful things too, so I expected more from your post. In this case I think you didn't read carefully, or didn't give him the benefit of the doubt or something. I can't believe you actually think his post was "ignorant" in the sense your sentence conveys. Anyway, my 2 cents. Now I'll shut up.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2011 | 11:50 AM
  #32  
omairtheman1's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
From: The Island of Long
Default

Originally Posted by WolfpackS2k
Originally Posted by JoeyBalls' timestamp='1308755048' post='20708003
I believe Ferrari is has publicly stated that they were back into making the quickest accelerating cars, not just top speed. I believe one of their newer cars was praised for how light it was etc?
Nah, none of their newer models can come close to being considered lightweight cars.
The only reason the S550 is called an S500 all over the world... People in America don't want to look at a newer model and see a smaller number designation hence the S550. Also the new CL550's and soon to be every "550" will carry their new 429 horsepower 4.6 liter Twin Turbo. They should, according to their designation, go back to calling it a CL460. But Americans don't want to buy a newer model and see that their neighbor has a higher denomination and an older car. The new 5.5 engine that AMG is getting is TT as well but will still carry the 63 designation. The highest AMG car was a SL73 sold in very few numbers in the US and yes it did have the same 7.3 engine that MB provides to Pagani for their 'Zonda' model. I know too much about MB's.
The S550 is called the S550 b/c it has a 5.5 litre V8. The current S600 is called 600 for historical reasons, ditto all the models with the "63" designation (the recent AMG engine was only 6.2 litres). There's been no SL73 sold as a production vehicle in the US and it wasn't even close to as powerful as the more recent SL65 AMG or Black Series model.
It does have a 5.5 liter V8. But at the same time the European version (which carries the same engine) continued to use the S500 name. The SL73 however were brought to America in limited quantity through AMG. Of course it wasn't as fast as the SL's of today because it was merely born from Boring out a stock SL600 block and were naturally aspirated unlike the new 5.5 or the 6.5 turbos that go in the SL63 and 65 respectively. Still do this day the stats are unclear on how much power they made but I am sure they are slower than any SL of today inlcluding the 550. This LINK Should help. To Mercedes, all the SL73's were SL600's because the SL73 was an AMG in house project.



Originally Posted by WolfpackS2k
Originally Posted by tak_one_77' timestamp='1308810596' post='20711078
[quote name='tien2' timestamp='1308754621' post='20707979'][quote name='stevoe88' timestamp='1308696362' post='20706047']Pretty sure an S600 already exists... They're just custom ordered or something.
I meant it being the next base model. The S430, S500, S550 were the base models. I was saying the s600 will be the next base model.I know they have the v12 s600, the amgs etc.
Err isn't the S350 the base?[/quote]Not in the US. In the US the base model is the S550. A 6 cylinder S Class sedan hasn't been sold in the US since the 90s (S320).
[/quote]

In 2006... Mercedes sold its first short wheel based W220 in America designating it as the S350. It shared the same engine and transmission as a E350. I sat in one and compared to my S500, it was half a foot shorter and was missing many options such as Bi-Xenon and such. Over all the dash stated a fuel economy of 17.9 which was about the same as what I see with my car over 2000 miles. The leather was also not as nice since my car has Napa leather. Also the S430 was available in short wheel base in Canada.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2011 | 07:37 PM
  #33  
NuncoStr8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,220
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by cbehney
Originally Posted by NuncoStr8' timestamp='1308809812' post='20711056
It does all "depend." But the idea that you can never experience the benefits of a car with higher limits on the street is an ignorant statement. Ever merged on a freeway? I'm guessing you haven't because you stated you will never get close to the limits of your car. Those of us who have merged onto freeways have indeed experienced the limits of our cars.

Ever passed a car on a two-lane road? I'm guessing you haven't, because you stated "On the street I will never be anywhere near the limit of what my car is capable of." Those of us who drive two lane roads have actually approached the limits of our cars' limitations while passing, in the interest of passing safely.

Ever had someone on a multi-lane road cross into your lane? Unless you piled into them because your car could not brake fast enough or maneuver out of the way while maintaining control, you've benefitted from driving a car with higher limits, with a larger performance envelope than other cars. It is the height of ignorance to suggest that 0-60 is the ultimate and encompassing measure of a car's total performance. And that attitude is what leads people to think that "You can never use it's potential on the street."

Ever have a deer cross the road while you are driving and been able to avoid it? I am guessing not, because anyone who has will testify to the responsiveness and stabilty of their vehicle for avoiding the accident.

Don't comment on things you know nothing about. Your theory that nobody ever approaches the limit of their car on public roads is a theory formulated by someone who has a very limited experience of driving. This apparently describes you, by your own testimony. So in the future please refrain from thinking your input is relevant.
I should stay out of it, but... Nunco, come on, I know you say some outrageous things on here but you also say some really insightful things too, so I expected more from your post. In this case I think you didn't read carefully, or didn't give him the benefit of the doubt or something. I can't believe you actually think his post was "ignorant" in the sense your sentence conveys. Anyway, my 2 cents. Now I'll shut up.
You are right. My post might contain something worthwhile, but it was couched in terms that were not. It's funny, if we were standing around a backyard we might start to say such things and then there would be a quiet pause, then mutual laughter as the ridiculous attitude is obvious, and nobody has hard feelings as nothing incredibly rude and stupid was actually said. But subtract the nuance of tone of voice and looking in the face of the person you are talking to, and it's too easy to forget the person on the other end of your words.

You do hear a lot of talk about "but I couldn't use 90% of it on the street," which sounds reasonable in regards to a Z06 or a GT3, but realistically, you can and would use the greatly expanded performance envelope of a serious sports car every day you drive it. You might not use the high speed or acceleration capability, but you would use enough of it on a regular basis to make it a funner and still safer car than less capable machines. That's what I should have written, and stopped there.

luder_555, I apologize. I came across much harsher than was really intended and what you had to say was reasonable and my response was not. I went too far and that is hardly polite. I don't want you to think I bear you any ill will. We agree on far more than we disagree. Cheers.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
QUIKAG
Car and Bike Talk
35
Aug 4, 2016 10:42 AM
Birel186
South Florida
67
Jan 7, 2008 06:54 AM
Jim Reichard
S2000 Vintage Owners
5
Oct 20, 2004 03:37 AM
FRM
Car and Bike Talk
63
May 5, 2004 12:30 PM
rankoslavujevic
Car and Bike Talk
7
Oct 18, 2003 01:32 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:19 PM.