Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Ford Taurus

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 07:01 AM
  #11  
ZDan's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,863
Likes: 125
From: Pawtucket, RI
Default

Big, heavy, dumb-looking car, with engine mounted fwd-style, transversely in front of the front wheels. It has a few ponies I guess, but I don't understand the hype AT ALL, particularly on an S2000 forum!
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 07:59 AM
  #12  
sahtt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,409
Likes: 0
Default

They have to start somewhere. "who cares, it's still a hyundai" didn't last either.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 08:15 AM
  #13  
ZDan's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,863
Likes: 125
From: Pawtucket, RI
Default

I don't see the Taurus as a good "start" for ANYthing.
Unless they evolve it into a much lighter-weight rwd sport sedan (never happen).
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 08:18 AM
  #14  
NFRs2000NYC's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 18,852
Likes: 1
From: New York
Default

Looks like a very promising car.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 08:18 AM
  #15  
Bboy AJ's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,816
Likes: 1
From: NYSE
Default

Very cool. I enjoyed the demonstrations. It means a lot more than just salesman talk. I imagine these examples would sell more cars, but there's the difficulty of getting people in the showrooms to begin with.

Tanner Foust is a cool guy. The blindspot example was just so ridiculous, though. You can tell it's extremely scripted, although it makes its point. Just to an incredulous degree

Thanks for posting this. Ford is on the up and up. Good for them.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 08:19 AM
  #16  
Bboy AJ's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,816
Likes: 1
From: NYSE
Default

Originally Posted by ZDan,Oct 3 2009, 11:15 AM
I don't see the Taurus as a good "start" for ANYthing.
Unless they evolve it into a much lighter-weight rwd sport sedan (never happen).
Ridiculous.

Reply
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 08:33 AM
  #17  
ZDan's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,863
Likes: 125
From: Pawtucket, RI
Default

What's ridiculous is yet another 4000 lb. step in the wrong direction.

Ford's on the wrong side of history with this one.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 09:29 AM
  #18  
Anrosphynx's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,582
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, California
Default

Originally Posted by ZDan,Oct 3 2009, 08:33 AM
What's ridiculous is yet another 4000 lb. step in the wrong direction.

Ford's on the wrong side of history with this one.
go sit in a Camry, then go sit in a new Taurus..


Report back.....
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 09:33 AM
  #19  
JonBoy's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 19,734
Likes: 247
Default

And then compare MSRP. The Taurus gets pretty expensive loaded up like that SHO! You get a lot but you pay a lot as well.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 09:58 AM
  #20  
shyong's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
From: Plano
Default

My folks had a Taurus wagon which was bought new in 1988...car lasted all of 3 years before the tranny went bad, among numerous other problems. That was enough of a bad taste to never purchase another Ford, let alone another Taurus.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:43 PM.