GM Comments...
They got themselves into this mess. The first step towards our country's future is to quit spending money we don't have. Don't look to the government to bail you out because they don't have the money either! At this rate the Chinese will own everything in this country. Sorry GM, you messed up, you gotta pay the price. Reflect on the decision making you did in years past, especially concerning the continuing development of fuel sucking vehicles when you should have been focused on efficiency.
Originally Posted by cdelena,Nov 6 2008, 10:51 AM
As much as they would like to declare bankruptcy and restructure their way out of some long term contracts the fact is few would buy a new car from a company with an unknown future. Sales would go to near zero.
But in my case, if they were entering a bankruptcy proceding that would shield them from creditors and emerge after getting rid of some serious liabilities (bad UAW contracts) then my faith about their prospects would be much better in them than if we just pour cash into a company with an unreal UAW burden.
I guess the short version of what I am trying to say is that the bankrutcy option would give me more faith in them than giving them cash, (unless it is obscene amounts of free cash) but who knows, I am probably the exception to the rule.
The feds will never let gm go under simply because they employ over 200,000 people. By I make them exhaust ALL options on the table first.
I expect something will come out of the government since we are talking about impacting 3 to 5 million jobs.
While the big three have done a miserable job in some respects, the government has hurt them more than the importers... some say Washington could help greatly...
"It would simply have to allow auto makers to meet the fuel economy standards with any mix of autos made in domestic or overseas factories."
'How dumb is the two-fleet rule? Nissan, in a petition for its removal, points out foreign brands may actually minimize the domestic content in their U.S. cars so they can continue to count as "nondomestic."'
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122584326266699163.html
While the big three have done a miserable job in some respects, the government has hurt them more than the importers... some say Washington could help greatly...
"It would simply have to allow auto makers to meet the fuel economy standards with any mix of autos made in domestic or overseas factories."
'How dumb is the two-fleet rule? Nissan, in a petition for its removal, points out foreign brands may actually minimize the domestic content in their U.S. cars so they can continue to count as "nondomestic."'
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122584326266699163.html
Originally Posted by cdelena,Nov 6 2008, 09:51 AM
The loans approved by Congress in September are tied up in the bureaucracy with projections that money might not reach to companies for 18 months... too late in today's environment.
As much as they would like to declare bankruptcy and restructure their way out of some long term contracts the fact is few would buy a new car from a company with an unknown future. Sales would go to near zero.
On top of that there is a fear that any substantial interruption in payments to suppliers would start a chain of bankruptcies that would effectively end major US auto production.
The 100 day comment was made by Troy Clarke, president of GM North America, who has a reputation as a straight shooter. It is not believed to be a bluff in any way.
As much as they would like to declare bankruptcy and restructure their way out of some long term contracts the fact is few would buy a new car from a company with an unknown future. Sales would go to near zero.
On top of that there is a fear that any substantial interruption in payments to suppliers would start a chain of bankruptcies that would effectively end major US auto production.
The 100 day comment was made by Troy Clarke, president of GM North America, who has a reputation as a straight shooter. It is not believed to be a bluff in any way.
Building cars isn't that complicated. The hard assets will continue to exist and they fall into the hands of people that will use them. The collective knowledge of the employees will reorganize under different banners with better business models.
A bankruptcy of the entire U.S. auto industry would lead to more innovation and better cars 10 years down the line. Or we can continue to muddle through for 10 years.
Accept a couple years of pain for long-term gain. Give Americans the chance to start new car companies that tackle today's transportation problems in new ways.
Why continue to support failed institutions?
EDIT: you know what? I'm wrong, forget all this mumbo jumbo.
http://www.autoblog.com/2008/11/05/gm-perf...inricy-retires/
John Heinricy, the GM performance guru, is retiring.
One more coffin nail
John Heinricy, the GM performance guru, is retiring.
One more coffin nail
Originally Posted by cdelena,Nov 6 2008, 03:06 PM
While the big three have done a miserable job in some respects, the government has hurt them more than the importers... some say Washington could help greatly...
Thats thing got a Hemi? And while there are stations in my area selling gas now for sub $2, there are a bunch of people out there who owned or still own guzzlers and have adopted the montra of "fool me once".








