Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Go Go MPS

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-14-2009, 05:26 PM
  #11  

 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Pawtucket, RI
Posts: 6,863
Received 124 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Pretty sad days when a 3100 lb.(!) fwd econobox (albeit with decent power) is considered a "sports car".

Bring me back small/lightweight rear-drive sports cars of yore!

Hyundai really missed the mark by aiming at the G35. Shoulda targeted the S13 240SX!

Oh well...
Old 09-14-2009, 07:26 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
mingster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 10,134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZDan,Sep 14 2009, 09:26 PM
Pretty sad days when a 3100 lb.(!) fwd econobox (albeit with decent power) is considered a "sports car".

Bring me back small/lightweight rear-drive sports cars of yore!

Hyundai really missed the mark by aiming at the G35. Shoulda targeted the S13 240SX!

Oh well...
looking at the last years of 240SX sales, i would say the business decision to go after G35/G37 was well executed. don't forget we're mostly enthusiasts here, and hyundai is here to sell as many cars and make as much margins as it can. appealing to a small group of people like us usually doesn't make a whole lot of sense if there were no mass appeal.
Old 09-14-2009, 10:45 PM
  #13  

 
TheDonEffect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 8,033
Received 493 Likes on 376 Posts
Default

^ yup. Also, it's positioned right there against the accord coupe and now deceased solara coupe and will entice folks who like the idea of a 3 series coupe/g35 coupe but don't want to fork over that kind of dough.
Not surprising though that the MS3 won out, it's a fantastic performer with a well sorted chassis. However I'd still take the gen coupe.
Old 09-15-2009, 02:17 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
Abdizzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Bunch of elitist bastards. As if it being FWD has any baring what so ever given their target audience. They are aiming it at people who want utility with a bit of a sporty edge, not "Sports Car" elites like yourselves who think anything FWD (Everything in Honda's lineup) is a disgrace.

I'm more than willing to bet that MS3 would offer plenty competition against an S2000 around a track. But that's not the point, the point is most of you don't even track your cars to warrant the advantages of owning a RWD car + most of you need to come back down to earth.
Old 09-15-2009, 02:27 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
foxy_s2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Brit in Athens, Greece
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

All of a sudden, I don't want the Genesis. Ever.

[QUOTE]
Much of the handling story on these cars simply can't be told by the numbers
Old 09-15-2009, 03:10 AM
  #16  

 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Pawtucket, RI
Posts: 6,863
Received 124 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mingster,Sep 14 2009, 07:26 PM
looking at the last years of 240SX sales, i would say the business decision to go after G35/G37 was well executed. don't forget we're mostly enthusiasts here, and hyundai is here to sell as many cars and make as much margins as it can. appealing to a small group of people like us usually doesn't make a whole lot of sense if there were no mass appeal.
However, 240SX popularity skyrocketed AFTER its demise, and NO automaker has taken advantage of that niche.

I still think Hyundai made a MISTAKE targeting the G for these reasons:
1. They not only have to compete against the more-powerful G37, they also have to compete against used G35's (which I'd rather have than either the Genesis coupe or G37)
2. They're moving too far upmarket at the very point in history when U.S. tastes in automobiles are moving downmarket (regardless of talk of economic "recovery", we should not, CANnot go back to spending more than we make)
3. They wind up being yet another oversized/overweight coupe, in a market that has plenty of them (new and used) that are better.
4. The small/lightweight/cheap rwd 2+2 coupe market is currently being served by NO one, and the pent-up demand is pretty significant. Had Hyundai gone smaller/lighter/cheaper, they'd have had the market to themselves.

They made a conservative decision, and they won't sell as many cars or make as much money because of it.
Old 09-15-2009, 04:39 AM
  #17  
Registered User
 
zachismisitok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,678
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Abdizzle,Sep 15 2009, 02:17 AM
Bunch of elitist bastards. As if it being FWD has any baring what so ever given their target audience. They are aiming it at people who want utility with a bit of a sporty edge, not "Sports Car" elites like yourselves who think anything FWD (Everything in Honda's lineup) is a disgrace.

I'm more than willing to bet that MS3 would offer plenty competition against an S2000 around a track. But that's not the point, the point is most of you don't even track your cars to warrant the advantages of owning a RWD car + most of you need to come back down to earth.
If it helps, I own both a regular mazda 3 and an s2000... I also track the s2k. I know the ms3 can perform well on the track (in fact an instructor here drives one). I won't take away from it. BUT, I still prefer RWD. I simply disagree with the comparo, and believe I have the experience to justify it. I don't really care who the car is aimed at. If they are going to market it as mazdaSPEED, I think it is fair for us "elitist" to aim at it. I think FWD starts to hit a wall when you get past the level of the ms3. Why do you think most race cars are not fwd.
Old 09-15-2009, 05:30 AM
  #18  

 
JonBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 19,698
Received 225 Likes on 159 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Abdizzle,Sep 15 2009, 04:17 AM
I'm more than willing to bet that MS3 would offer plenty competition against an S2000 around a track. But that's not the point, the point is most of you don't even track your cars to warrant the advantages of owning a RWD car + most of you need to come back down to earth.
+1

A local guy here in Texas tracks his MS3. He embarrasses a lot of S2000s in that car and we have a lot of really good drivers here.

FWD or not, it's a very quick and capable car on the street and on the track.
Old 09-15-2009, 06:17 AM
  #19  
Registered User
 
Malloric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=ZDan,Sep 15 2009, 03:10 AM] However, 240SX popularity skyrocketed AFTER its demise, and NO automaker has taken advantage of that niche.

I still think Hyundai made a MISTAKE targeting the G for these reasons:
1.
Old 09-15-2009, 04:44 PM
  #20  

 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Pawtucket, RI
Posts: 6,863
Received 124 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Malloric,Sep 15 2009, 06:17 AM
And auto makers car that their used cars are popular among some miniscule niche market who is too poor to buy new cars because?
The niche market expanded quite a bit AFTER the 240SX died. I believe that there is more of a market for that car now than there was while it was around.

My judgment remains that *I* think it would have been smarter for Hyundai to "aim lower" than the G35/G37 and hit a segment where there is pent-up demand and no competition.

In any case, it certainly would have been more INTERESTING if they'd done that, rather than give us another G35.

Even for most enthusiasts cars are an appliance first and a toy second. Why do you care so much about a 2+2?
2-seater would be fine, but as far as I'm concerned, for a street car, a 2+2 hatch makes a lot of sense.

There are plenty of RWD 2 seaters, and even a few that qualify as light. Run out and get yourself an Lotus Elise/Exige or Corvette.
Corvette is not "light" in my book. Just about everything else is just heavy! Suffice it to say I won't be spending $50k on a new car anytime soon...

It's not like anyone who isn't a midget with no legs wants to sit in the back of a 2+2. I mean, try putting an adult in the back of a 911. Unless they're remarkably flexible and curl into a ball with their knees behind their ears it's not going to happen. So what do you really lose when going to a Cayman/Boxter, S2000, Elise, etc?
You can put STUFF back there. The additional space comes in quite handy.
As far as that goes, I'd be all for a small/lightweight 2-seater coupe/hatch as well...

But anyway my point was that it woulda been nice if Hyundai had, instead of giving us yet another 3400 lb. coupe, if they'd gone smaller/cheaper/lighter, less lux and (if it saves a few $$$ and weight) less power. Say 2800 lb. with an n/a and the turbo 4. Minimal luxo features. No stability control. 16" base and 17" option wheels (do we really need 18 and 19"?! NO) Maybe it would have been a sales disaster, but they'd have sold at least one!


Quick Reply: Go Go MPS



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:30 PM.