Google shares plunge in after hours trading
#11
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You guys capping on Google tend to forget information also ads value. Money and worth are made from pure ideas and information all the time, not just from what can be appraised and sold.
Sam
Sam
#12
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Philly
Posts: 2,129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Christople,Jan 31 2006, 11:02 PM
Please tell me again how Google shares going down relates to GM/Ford as a company and is in the car talk forum?
So Google's market cap > Ford and GM market caps combined. Therefore, Ford and GM = poop. But then Google = poop now too since they had lower than expected profits last quarter. Therefore Ford and GM = super poopy.
And if we continue with that "logic", Google's market cap is still more than double that of Honda Motor Corp. Honda announced blowout earnings just 2 days ago. But Honda's market cap is still much lower than Google's. And as we previously presuposed, Google now = poop. Therefore Honda must = worse than poop too.
Toyota Motor Corp has a market cap that is slightly higher than Google. But Google = poop now. Therefore Toyota = slightly better than poop.
So there you have it: All automakers are worth less than poop - Except for Toyota, who is worth marginally more than poop is worth.
Andrew
#13
Originally Posted by slicksilver,Jan 31 2006, 08:48 PM
If you don't understand you shouldn't comment
Nice try though, slick.
#15
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: new york
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by QUIKAG,Feb 1 2006, 11:22 AM
The only thing I realize is YOU don't understand what MARKET CAPITALIZATION really means.
Nice try though, slick.
Nice try though, slick.
#16
Originally Posted by steve c,Jan 31 2006, 10:33 PM
GM has an amazing large cash reserve.
In this case, having a large cash reserve may not be a good thing for the long haul.
#18
Registered User
Originally Posted by The Hoth,Feb 1 2006, 12:11 PM
That means GM doesn't know how or has no immediate plan to invest its cash(eg. capital spending) to generate future revenues. Oh yeah, I almost forgot due to sliding market shares, GM has to reduce its capacity.
In this case, having a large cash reserve may not be a good thing for the long haul.
In this case, having a large cash reserve may not be a good thing for the long haul.
The minute they do that, is the minute they really do go bankrupt.
GM is smarter to keep borrowing than to be using their own money (not to mention the less money you have in the bank, the less you can borrow), even though it reduces the value of their company to investors.
#19
Administrator
Originally Posted by BPUKiller,Feb 1 2006, 12:53 AM
You guys capping on Google tend to forget information also ads value. Money and worth are made from pure ideas and information all the time, not just from what can be appraised and sold.
Sam
Sam
You forget that Google doesn't actually own [hardly] any of the information is serves. Google is almost purely a service company. They provide a search service. They provide a news aggregation service. They provide a map viewing and navigation service. The provide (and earn almost all of their revenue from) an advertising brokerage service. Googles value is in doing those things extremely well and in their brand.
Another provider could offer all of the things Google does (many do: MSN, Yahoo, etc.) but none of them do it anywhere nearly as well. Investors are buying the Google brand and the current success it's had delivering their message to the consumer.
A manufacturing company is an entirely different ball of wax.
#20
Originally Posted by The Hoth,Feb 1 2006, 12:11 PM
That means GM doesn't know how or has no immediate plan to invest its cash(eg. capital spending) to generate future revenues. Oh yeah, I almost forgot due to sliding market shares, GM has to reduce its capacity.
In this case, having a large cash reserve may not be a good thing for the long haul.
In this case, having a large cash reserve may not be a good thing for the long haul.
The union contracts make it very difficult for them to reduce production, and production costs so that will happen slowly. The years of misguided expansion have left then with a brand mix that needs revision and that will take time and cost a lot. The years of pushing product that in some areas has been inferior have left them with a legacy that will take time and money to correct.
I think that many on this board underestimate how hard it is to steer a huge corporation (GM is larger than Toyota in every respect other than profits), especially one that is hampered by so many factors that cannot be quickly changed.
For the good of the US economy and consumer I do hope that GM pulls through.. and then the market cap will be more realistic (and IMO the Google cap is not).